HANSARD
SITTING CALENDAR
SEARCH
LIVE BROADCAST
Hansard Dynamic Subject Index
House of Assembly - Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)
2017-11-01 Daily Xml
Contents
Pdf Xml

Public Works Committee: City Tram Extension Project AdeLINK

Ms VLAHOS (Taylor) (11:27): On behalf of the member for Elder, I move:

That the 574th report of the committee, entitled City Tram Extension Project AdeLINK, be noted.

This project, which is already underway, is for the expansion of the tram network along North Terrace to the East End and along King William Road to the Adelaide Festival Centre precinct. It is the first stage in both the CityLINK and EastLINK tram extensions that will see the tram network expand to incorporate a city loop and a tramline to the eastern suburbs. The tramline along North Terrace will have three tram stops:

one near the Gawler Place intersection to service Rundle Mall to the north and the cultural precinct to the south;

another near the Pulteney Street intersection to service the university precinct and the east end of Rundle Mall and Rundle Street; and

the final stop will be outside the old Royal Adelaide Hospital to service the east end of the city, the Botanic Garden and the new CBD high school, which will be located on Frome Road.

The other tramline will extend down King William Road to the Adelaide Festival Centre precinct, with a tram stop near the Adelaide Festival Centre. This will service the well-known area of Elder Park and provide easier access to the River Torrens. The delivery of this project has been determined in consultation with local businesses, educational institutions, the City of Adelaide and other key stakeholders in the area. There has been strong support from stakeholders for intense construction periods of 24/7 operations to reduce the length of construction interruption to all of Adelaide.

As members have probably noticed, work has already commenced on the project, with the first stage of intensive works on North Terrace being undertaken during the last school holiday period, and another weekend of intense works along King William Road. There will be a further major intense construction period in early January 2018 to upgrade the King William Street-North Terrace intersection, again taking advantage of reduced traffic due to summer holidays and school holidays. Consultation is ongoing throughout the project with all the stakeholders, particularly Tourism SA, to avoid any tram works affecting the Tour Down Under cycling routes and projects that are often undertaken over the summer.

The intent is to have the tramline completed by the end of January 2018. The project is a key component of the South Australian Integrated Transport and Land Use Plan and the Adelaide light rail network. It will provide new, more reliable transport services along the city's cultural and educational boulevard and support economic activity and enhance connectivity to the East End of Adelaide. In addition, it will provide much-needed public transport to major events such as the Clipsal 500 and the Adelaide Fringe.

I wish to thank the current and former members of Public Works Committee for their consideration of this important project. Given this, and pursuant to section 12C of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1991, the Public Works Committee reports to parliament that it recommends the proposed public work.

Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (11:30): I rise to also speak regarding the tram extension along North Terrace as the local member. Firstly, I will say on the record that, as the local member, the residents of the East End, the business owners in particular, were very much in favour of this project. As their member, I have supported this project along North Terrace.

There were great fears, and still are, that with the closing of the Royal Adelaide Hospital and the lack of activation of that site, albeit that the new hospital was announced around 10 years ago, we still do not have a master plan for that site, and we still do not have new tenants in there. The transition is taking a lot longer than was anticipated, and the traders in the East End have been already severely affected by the loss of trade. They saw the tram as a glimmer of hope to getting more people to the East End, so I have been supportive of this tram project.

However, one of the reasons that I decided to stand for parliament was as a result of the tram extension along North Terrace towards West Terrace. My office was in the Qantas building across the road from Parliament House. I had been there for around five years at the time and I had enjoyed the location. However, when the tram was put in, my personal business was affected. We lost all the loading zones in front of our business, and we lost all the trees along North Terrace in front of our office, so people could no longer drop in or pick up. In a modelling agency, you have uniforms, people used to be paid by cheque and parents would drop off children and load. Basically, we lost all that access.

Even worse, we lost all right-hand turns anywhere in the city. Coming from the north, as I did from Prospect, I used to be able to turn right at North Terrace from King William Street and get to my office. That was taken away. I requested hook turns, as they have in Melbourne. That was rejected, so I thought I could go around the back of the Festival Centre because that was the other way that you could get through. They then put in a new set of lights there because of the tram and you could not turn left between 7am and 7pm. Actually, you could not turn right; you could turn left.

However, because they built the tram with a raised median strip, I could not then turn left and then right into my car park, which was Woodson's Lane, or the Stamford Plaza car park, which also required the same manoeuvre—a left and then a right—so I could not get across. I worked out a way, where I could go up Kintore Avenue and around and then get into my car park. However, getting home, I could come out from Woodson's Lane to the new intersection.

Now you cannot turn right and go behind the Festival Centre, so the only way you could get out of there, besides going around the whole city, would be to do a U-turn, which was illegal at the time. I note that a lot of people do a U-turn there now because the Festival Centre road has been closed. They had police on the intersection straight after the tram was put in, and at least 20 of us were spoken to about doing a U-turn there, which meant there was practically no way for me to get access to my business or car park.

Because of the raised median strip, it meant that people coming to my office from Port Road could not get across, from West Terrace they could not get across and from the north they could not turn right. Basically, I tried to move out of the city as soon as possible because the tram had made doing business near impossible for me. I moved all my after-school and after-work courses to a Saturday in the hope that people would catch a tram, a bus or find some other way in, because the city traffic in the evening, the no right-hand turns and the inaccessibility, made business impossible the way I had done it for the previous 10 years or so.

I then looked for an office on Melbourne Street, where there was better parking availability, but I had to survive through the 10 months or year remaining on my lease hardly making any money. I moved my business out of the city because of the tram. Whilst I was positive about the tram, and I knew that the East End traders wanted a tram, I made it very clear to everyone I spoke to, including the Adelaide city council and the Public Works Committee, that if they were going to put a tram in it needed to be with the same formulation we currently have from Victoria Square to South Terrace.

They should not repeat the mistakes of the North Terrace to West Terrace tram, which took away two lanes of traffic. It took away a lot of parking, it took away loading zones and it took away trees and added in traffic lights. It had a raised median strip, which meant there was no accessibility anywhere. The tram is a good idea if you have it as it is on the other side of Victoria Square, where you can drive on the tramline, you can turn right where the tramline is and it does not take up all the space.

However, what I found out was that, no, exactly the same problems and all the mistakes that were made with the original tramline along North Terrace would be repeated. Where there were up to five lanes of traffic—two right-turning lanes, two straight-ahead lanes and one left-turn lane—there will now be only two lanes of traffic in both directions. The traffic jams that we have been experiencing along North Terrace from King William Street to West Terrace will now be repeated to the other end of town—for what, I ask, when we could have done it the right way and made it a lot easier.

The only good thing is that, because it is a cultural boulevard, there are not as many commercial businesses that rely on people pulling up along North Terrace. That begs the question: why would you try to discourage people from walking when you have just spent millions of dollars on a boulevard, the idea of which is to promenade along and enjoy? We have removed all the traffic lanes. I think there is only one right-hand turn affected. However, we now have a tram that does not turn right.

If you are coming from Glenelg and would like to go to the East End, say when the Festival is on and there is lots going on in the East End, or you would just like to go to a restaurant on a Friday or Saturday night, you have to get off the tram either at Rundle Mall and walk through to Gawler Place to the next tram stop or go around the corner, get off at the Railway Station and then wait another 10 to 15 minutes for a tram in the other direction to take you towards the East End. To my mind, that means you might as well just walk, so what was the point of $6 million per 100 metres to extend three tram stops?

The government, apparently, is not redoing this intersection properly so that it can go in all directions, as it used to when there was a tram there previously, because it was too expensive. Apparently, that would have cost $20 million extra. That is a lot of money, I agree. However, this government found $10 million extra to speed up this project so that it could make sure that it would be ready in time for the next election. When it has a political imperative, this government can find money from wherever, but when it is practical and sensible why would you spend $10 million when you could have spent the $20 million and have a proper intersection at North Terrace and King William Street?

If you have a planned future of trams, it is ridiculous to do it in such a hotchpotch way that we are going to have to go through this again and dig up North Terrace and King William, definitely the busiest intersection in my electorate and possibly one of the busiest in the state. Why not do it properly? Why not do it once? Why not do it this time? Whilst I hope that the tram will take more people to the East End, I think it might be quicker to walk there, given that at this point the tram does not turn right. It is a shame that the government is not spending the right amount of money to do the job properly and to do it once.

Motion carried.

PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS
MEMBERS
GET INVOLVED
ABOUT PARLIAMENT
VISIT
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY
CONTACT