HANSARD
SITTING CALENDAR
SEARCH
LIVE BROADCAST
Hansard Dynamic Member Index
Legislative Council - Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)
2021-02-03 Daily Xml
Contents
Pdf Xml

Medical Facilities

The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (15:10): I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Health and Wellbeing regarding medical facilities.

Leave granted.

The Hon. K.J. MAHER: In November last year, InDaily reported statements from the Premier regarding the use of the old Wakefield Hospital as a dedicated facility for those with COVID-19. The article reported the Premier as saying that the government wanted to immediately relocate positive coronavirus into the new facility—to immediately relocate. The article went on to say, and I quote the Premier from the article:

At that old Wakefield Hospital there is a large capacity there, which can be flexed up to deal with surges…

My questions to the minister are:

1. Was it based purely on health advice that the Wakefield Hospital was not selected, as initially suggested, as a dedicated facility?

2. How much taxpayer money was spent on matters related to the old Wakefield Hospital as a dedicated quarantine facility before those plans were scrapped?

The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (15:12): I would make three points in relation to this. The old Wakefield Hospital was not secured as a possible COVID-positive facility in November last year. My understanding is that it was really quite early, I suspect it was March or April, that the old Wakefield Hospital was secured and it is still under contract, available to the South Australian government.

The second element is in relation to the point I have already made in response to a previous answer. The Premier said late last year that the government would immediately establish a dedicated facility for COVID-positive people. That is exactly what happened. There's a dedicated facility to this day at the Pullman hotel.

In terms of the question that I think the honourable member asked: was the decision not to use the old Wakefield based on health advice? Yes, it was. What I can say is that the Wakefield Hospital was one of the sites assessed. My recollection is that the team involved in the assessment of what facility would be appropriate as a COVID-positive dedicated standalone facility assessed over 100 facilities, obviously some at a deeper level than others, but a very thorough scan was made in Adelaide. It is hardly surprising that a number of facilities were not seen as appropriate and old Wakefield was one of them.

PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS
MEMBERS
GET INVOLVED
ABOUT PARLIAMENT
VISIT
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY
CONTACT