HANSARD
SITTING CALENDAR
SEARCH
LIVE BROADCAST
Hansard Dynamic Subject Index
House of Assembly - Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)
2013-02-21 Daily Xml
Contents
Pdf Xml

CRIMINAL LAW CONSOLIDATION (AGGRAVATED OFFENCES) AMENDMENT BILL

Second Reading

Adjourned debate on second reading.

(Continued from 29 November 2012.)

The Hon. R.B. SUCH (Fisher) (11:14): I will make a brief contribution. The member for Waite through this bill expresses his concern and seeks action in relation to helping to protect in particular healthcare workers, practitioners, ambulance officers and so on. I find it disgusting and disgraceful that anyone would want to attack health professionals. Some years ago when I was in the Royal Adelaide for my famous operation, I was astounded to see that there was a requirement for security guards—basically, bodyguards—in wards. I think that is an indication of the low point we have reached in our society, when we need security guards in wards as well as nurses, doctors and other health professionals.

I understand the rationale of the member for Waite, but I doubt whether the sort of people who are likely to attack a doctor, nurse or any other health professional would be considering in their mind, at that time, that there would be an increased penalty if they attacked that person. The same would apply in relation to attacking a police officer: I do not think the sort of person who would attack a police officer or a doctor would think rationally, 'Gee, if I attack this person I'm going to get a heavier penalty than if I attack someone else.'

Nevertheless, I think it is good to have a wider range of options so that if someone does the low act of assault or similar on a health professional, the court has a stronger remedy in terms of expressing the abhorrence and disgust of the community at that sort of behaviour. I am not convinced that the potential offender would weigh up in their mind that they would cop a heavier penalty if they attacked a nurse or doctor than anyone else. If it does deter someone that is great, but I think the benefit would be that the court would have the capacity to have a much heavier penalty imposed on the offender.

I support the intention of the member for Waite. I think he is directing things in the right way, but I am a little apprehensive as to whether it will bring about a fundamental change in the behaviour of the lowlifes who attack medical professionals.

Debate adjourned on motion of Mrs Geraghty.

PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS
MEMBERS
GET INVOLVED
ABOUT PARLIAMENT
VISIT
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY
CONTACT