HANSARD
SITTING CALENDAR
SEARCH
LIVE BROADCAST
Hansard Dynamic Member Index
House of Assembly - Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)
2009-07-16 Daily Xml
Contents
Pdf Xml

SUMMARY OFFENCES (PIERCING AND SCARIFICATION) AMENDMENT BILL

Second Reading

Adjourned debate on second reading.

(Continued from 5 March 2009. Page 1868.)

Mr GOLDSWORTHY (Kavel) (11:08): I sought leave to continue my remarks on 5 March, and my comments this morning are a continuation of that contribution. I was talking about the report of the Select Committee on the Tattooing and Body Piercing Industries, tabled in the parliament. I want to speak to the house about the report, which was comprehensive; it comprised 50-odd pages and made 15 recommendations. I want to quote a couple of paragraphs relevant to this bill regarding body piercing. Under the heading of Body Piercing, the report states:

The problem of regulating body piercing is more complex than regulating tattooing because of the enormous range of piercing available and the lack of skills and qualifications held by those operators performing these procedures.

The only relatively simple aspect of this subject is traditional ear piercing. This is so entrenched in sections of our society, and with some small risk of complication, that it should continue to be permitted to be performed on any minor with parental consent, provided that the equipment, the person performing the procedure and technique are approved by the licensing authorities.

It seems clear that the comments about regulation and licensing, in the context of tattooing, should have similar application to body piercing establishments. Under the heading 'Summary of Evidence as it relates to the Terms of Reference' it reads:

(c) the effectiveness of enforcement under the Summary Offences Act 1953 and other legislation;

Currently there is no provision under the Summary Offences Act 1953 for prohibiting body piercing in minors. Given the lack of powers accorded to the police to investigate suspected incidents of underage tattooing, and the inability of the fine to function as an adequate deterrent, it is clear that penalties and the police powers should be reviewed.

I think that is important information in the context of debating this legislation, in terms of the fact that it has been difficult to monitor and police these activities. However, as I said, the report tabled by the select committee contained 15 recommendations and very interesting information. The opposition supports the bill.

Debate adjourned on motion of Mrs Geraghty.

PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS
MEMBERS
GET INVOLVED
ABOUT PARLIAMENT
VISIT
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY
CONTACT