HANSARD
SITTING CALENDAR
SEARCH
LIVE BROADCAST
Hansard Dynamic Member Index
House of Assembly - Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)
2020-11-10 Daily Xml
Contents
Pdf Xml

Statutes Amendment (National Energy Laws) (Omnibus) Bill

Second Reading

Adjourned debate on second reading.

(Continued from 15 October 2020.)

The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens) (12:35): Mr Deputy Speaker, it is good to have you back in the chair again for another energy bill. I know how you enjoy them so much.

The DEPUTY SPEAKER: We all enjoy them, member for West Torrens.

The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS: Yes, we all do, sir. The government is proposing, on behalf of what used to be known as the COAG Energy Council, an omnibus bill to make various amendments—

The DEPUTY SPEAKER: Member for West Torrens, sorry to interrupt—

The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS: I am the lead speaker.

The DEPUTY SPEAKER: Thank you.

The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS: I should point out that the opposition have had a longstanding policy of supporting COAG-agreed national legislation as the state is a lead legislator. I will also point out to the house that, through an arrangement with the minister, the opposition will be formulating its position on this bill between the houses. However, I can say that there is a long tradition of the opposition—no matter who the opposition is at any time—supporting this, given South Australia's important national role as the lead legislator.

From the information given to me by the government—I was briefed on the bill last night, which was the first opportunity that I had to arrange a briefing; the government offered the briefing earlier, so there is no criticism of the government—the omnibus bill makes a series of cleaning-up measures, as it were, of the national energy laws, it amends the National Electricity Law, the National Gas Law, the National Energy Retail Law and the Australian Energy Market Commission Establishment Act 2005.

The council—that is, the COAG Energy Council, or whatever its new term is now—has agreed that there be a legislative package to reduce some administrative burdens and clean up the act. Broadly, this seems to me to be a very simple and commonsense piece of legislation that the government is bringing on behalf of the Energy Council. I am advised that the omnibus bill clarifies the meaning of a participating jurisdiction to address an ambiguity in the context of participation of non-interconnected jurisdictions to the National Electricity Market. That includes the Northern Territory, which is a member of the NEM, and Western Australia, which is not a member of the NEM but a state, nevertheless, that participates in the Energy Council.

Of course, the bill also amends the meaning of 'minister', for consistency. I am not quite sure what the disparity was in the representative acts, but I am sure it makes complete sense. It removes, of course, a redundant reference to the limited merits review regime. You might remember, Mr Deputy Speaker, that former energy minister and current Treasurer, the Hon. Josh Frydenberg, committed to removing the ability of a limited merits review from regulated assets. He believed, as I think many people believe, that the process was flawed and that it enabled regulated assets to be able to inflate their return and they were gaming the process.

The commonwealth government acted unilaterally, without the consent of the COAG Energy Council, in my opinion in the national interest, and removed the limited merits review, and this now recognises that change. It is probably not the best process to act unilaterally, as they had, but nevertheless the outcome was good—a more political process than a negotiated process, if memory serves me correctly.

It also removes the current limitations on the National Gas Law, which will enable any party to be able to propose rule changes. Currently, I am advised only the Victorian minister, and I assume the commonwealth minister, can propose rule changes for the Victorian gas market. Given this is truly a national market, the amendments will allow all jurisdictions, I am advised, to request rule changes of the Australian Energy Market Commission.

A controversial move by the Energy Council, I think, is to halt the process of allowing advertising or requiring advertising in newspapers. I am sure that is news to the ears of media outlets across South Australia, but I think it reflects what the council believes is a more efficient and timely way of getting information out to community.

I am not quite sure that this is necessary. I am sure the bureaucracy of each department around the country thinks this is a good idea, a way to save money but, in truth, this advertising money is crucial to many papers and crucial to many regional publications that rely on this advertising. It might be redundant in the minds of many bureaucrats, but I suspect it is just another blow to the viability of mainstream media. Given it is a national reform, the opposition will be supporting it, but I am not quite sure it is necessary.

The government was also very kind to refer me to the 'COAG Energy Council, Senior Committee of Officials, Omnibus legislative amendments, Explanatory note for stakeholder consultation', which goes through the package in detail, talking about which act is amended and what the amendments do. I am informed that submissions were requested to be provided by May this year. I have not seen the outcome of what the stakeholders have advised, but I assume the council has done its due diligence and negotiated and discussed the changes with stakeholders, but it is a very thorough package.

I think the most interesting one for me, which was not included in the briefing note but I think the house should have some view on—and the minister may have detailed it in his second reading contribution, which I have not had the opportunity to read as yet—is the commercial arbitration provisions. The briefing paper I am quoting from the 'COAG Energy Council, Senior Committee of Officials, Omnibus legislative amendments, Explanatory note for stakeholder consultation' states:

Under the national electricity rules (the Rules), certain disputes between parties in relation to matters arising under the Rules may be determined by a 'dispute resolution panel'. For each jurisdiction applying the NEL, the NEL provides that the 'Commercial Arbitration Act' of that jurisdiction…

So every state has its own arbitration measures and the current National Energy Law requires you to use those. I understand that is being amended to give these requirements, and both make reference to certain provisions of the Commercial Arbitration Act of this jurisdiction. I think that means that there would be one set of rules across the entire jurisdiction for commercial arbitration. If I am wrong, I am sure the minister will correct me.

The other reforms do not seem to be that controversial, which is why, I imagine, the passage of this legislation will be swift through the House of Assembly and hopefully pass the upper house before the new year so the government can inform the council that it indeed has fulfilled its requirements as part of being the national lead legislator. Stakeholders, I understand, are broadly supportive, although I have not seen anything that would contradict that.

The last part that I wish to discuss is, 'Limitation of Duty on Commonwealth Officers or Bodies amendments'. Apparently, the commonwealth government has requested that the states implement legislation in the governing national statute, and I quote from this document again:

The amendments in the Omnibus Bill complement the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 and address constitutional issues raised in R v Hughes…These amendments are modelled on section 6AAC of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989.

The bill removes inconsistencies in the constitutional reading down provisions in the NEL, the National Gas Law, the National Energy Retail Law and the schedules so as to avoid commonwealth officers being subject to state legislation. I assume that is what it means. Again, the opposition takes the government on face value that this is an important amendment.

I thank the minister for arranging the briefing that he did yesterday and his understanding, in that the opposition has not yet formed a position but will allow the speedy passage of this bill. Given that I am the only speaker on this bill, I do not propose any amendments; therefore, the opposition is not seeking to go into committee to ask any questions. I commend the bill to the house. The opposition will be stating its position in the other place.

The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart—Minister for Energy and Mining) (12:47): I acknowledge the comments and the contribution from the shadow minister. This is a pretty straightforward bill. It is an amalgamation of a lot of small pieces, each one being fairly separate, so it is not trying to be anything more complicated than exactly what is on the paper in front of us. Of course, some of these pieces are very important, and I might just step through a few of them again—not to redo the second reading contribution but just to address a couple of things the shadow minister has commented on.

With regard to newspaper advertising, it is important to point out that this is not a prohibition on newspaper advertising but is actually the removal of an obligation for newspaper advertising, and that is really just so that the system can keep up with modern times. The member for West Torrens says—and I will not get the words just right—that this is essentially another blow to mainstream media, or thereabouts is what he said.

I do not agree with that because our state government over the last 2½ years has similarly removed some obligations upon ourselves with regard to advertising, and particularly with regard to public notices and things like that, in newspapers, including regional newspapers around South Australia, and yet we have increased our spend in regional newspapers around Australia.

So we have removed the obligation to spend, made it voluntary and deliberately—actively, with our eyes wide open—increased the total spend because we still believed that that was the effective way to get messages out to people. I do not think there is any reason to believe that keeping up with the times, as is suggested in this bill for national electricity, gas and other energy matters, is necessarily going to be harmful to any newspaper baron anywhere in the country.

The shadow minister also asked about the commercial arbitration provisions. Essentially, that is about removing the situation we have at the moment, which is that, whenever there is a dispute, it is the commercial arbitration act of the particular jurisdiction in which the dispute is raised that oversees the dispute resolution. While there is no implied or explicit criticism of any of those acts or those jurisdictions, we are trying to get as much consistency as possible around the nation with regard to how we deal with these matters.

At its simplest, this is about saying that regardless of where a dispute is raised and the jurisdiction the dispute is raised in, we will try to deal with it with one set of dispute resolution guidelines. That one set will be provided through the regulations attached to this bill. As a person who was in opposition and even in government, I understand that it is not ideal to be asking anybody to agree to a bill that has important regulations attached to it without being able to see the regulations.

For Liberal or Labor, it does not matter what the issue is, it is something that all of us at one point in time have found frustrating for one reason or another because, naturally, we all want more information. Even if there is only a small amount of information left to be shared from the development of the regulations, of course we would all still like to have that extra bit of information. Let it just be very clear that there is not intended to be anything untoward or any difficulty here whatsoever.

The National Electricity Law and the National Gas Law will be amended to allow that reference to commercial arbitration act provisions to be prescribed by the relevant regulations. This will ensure that references can easily be amended in future as required, and the National Electricity (South Australia) (Commercial Arbitration Acts) Variation Regulations 2020 and the National Gas (South Australia) (Commercial Arbitration Acts) Variation Regulations 2020 include changes to procedural provisions of the relevant commercial arbitration act of the jurisdiction.

As the member for West Torrens said, this is something that has come through COAG Energy Council; I believe it was agreed to on 19 August 2019, so it has taken a while to make its way to this place. The relevant energy ministers from each of these jurisdictions, no doubt on behalf of their other cabinet colleagues, who are even more involved in dispute resolution and their relevant obligations in their states, all agree that they are comfortable with this direction. This is something that has broad support.

Essentially, we are just trying to tidy things up. The words the member for West Torrens used with regard to the NEM and the sentiment he put forward I agree with entirely. We know that we are way beyond states operating on their own in energy, whether that be electricity, gas or other forms of energy. We know that that cannot operate anymore. If we did that, it would be to our detriment to try to just have supply and demand contained within our borders.

Of course we do not do that anymore but, as we progress further and further down that pathway, we need to make sure that legislation and regulation keep up with us. Even in some of these things that may seem to be hardly the most consequential matters with regard to making sure we reduce prices, improve reliability and continue to improve with regard to emissions reductions, they are still nonetheless very important.

I believe we all expect that it is highly unlikely there will be an interconnector built between South Australia and Western Australia anytime soon or an interconnector built between Western Australia and the Northern Territory anytime soon or any of the other things that, in an ideal world, might make this the complete utopian National Electricity Market.

Nonetheless, we have to do the very best we can with what we have, and we already have Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania interconnected. There are moves afoot among all those states to try to further enhance that interconnection. They are very important and very significant pieces of work, and every member in this house would certainly know the government's position with regard to the proposed interconnector between South Australia and New South Wales.

We are trying to the best of our ability to get synchronisation in energy between as many states as possible around the nation. That comes at the top tier of interconnection and sharing of very significant generation assets and very significant demand loads between states. It also applies at what might seem to be far less consequential but still very important areas: removing obligations on market bodies to advertise or provide information in specific ways.

They still must do it effectively, they still must do it expediently, they still must do it so that those who require the information would get it, but it is removing obligations on how they do it, removing limitations on the National Gas Law by enabling any party to propose a rule change request and, of course, dealing with the declared Victorian wholesale gas market, as the member suggested.

The government is fully supportive of this bill. The government hopes that it gets through the other house. We appreciate the support in this chamber of the opposition. As the shadow minister says, there is a longstanding convention, and not just out of habit but out of a strong sense of practicality, that the former opposition and the current opposition have supported the legislation of the government of the day when it comes here on behalf of the COAG Energy Council.

I acknowledge that the member opposite has said that the opposition has not come to a formal position yet on this bill, but I am very hopeful and very optimistic that when the opposition deal with this in the other place very shortly they will come to a position of supporting this bill as is, unamended, because that is what is good for South Australia and that is what is good for the nation.

Bill read a second time.

Third Reading

The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart—Minister for Energy and Mining) (12:58): I move:

That this bill be now read a third time.

Bill read a third time and passed.

Sitting suspended from 12:58 to 14:00.

PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS
MEMBERS
GET INVOLVED
ABOUT PARLIAMENT
VISIT
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY
CONTACT