HANSARD
SITTING CALENDAR
SEARCH
LIVE BROADCAST
Hansard Dynamic Subject Index
Legislative Council - Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)
2018-05-30 Daily Xml
Contents
Pdf Xml

Fund My Neighbourhood

The Hon. E.S. BOURKE (15:04): I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Treasurer a question.

Leave granted.

The Hon. E.S. BOURKE: The following is an extract from an email that was recently brought to my attention. The message was signed off by the acting executive director for government communications and engagement:

Fund My Neighbourhood will not continue in 2018. Fund My Neighbourhood funding will be allocated to support commitments made by the new State Government that will improve South Australian communities.

My question to the Treasurer is: does this statement correctly reflect the government's decision to cut round 2 of the fully funded Fund My Neighbourhood Program? If so, was it the Premier's decision or the Treasurer's decision to cut round 2 of this funding?

The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:04): The member's characterisation of the decision is entirely accurate, to use a phrase that I used earlier. This was a Labor program, one which we were not committed to. We made no commitment prior to the election to continue the $20 million stage 2 of Fund My Neighbourhood and, indeed, when asked, explicitly refused to do so. This was an example of the sort of programs and the waste that the former government sadly engaged in in a desperate but unfailing attempt to get re-elected prior to the last election. There was so much money being sloshed around the community by the former government—

Members interjecting:

The PRESIDENT: Order! Let the minister respond in silence.

The Hon. R.I. LUCAS: —whether it was money being thrown at companies who, when they received the $10 million, said they were coming to South Australia even if they didn't get the $10 million; whether it was the $2.7 million personal slush fund of the former Treasurer so that every Greek community, church or organisation in a marginal Labor seat or a seat that the Labor Party wanted to win could get a grant prior to the last election; or whether it was programs like Fund My Neighbourhood, where the Labor Party or the former Labor government threw $20 million at the community. They just threw $20 million at the community and said, 'Go on, pick whatever project you like. Whatever you want you can have, and the taxpayers of South Australia will pay for it.'

Members interjecting:

The PRESIDENT: Order!

The Hon. R.I. LUCAS: 'There is $20 million in the first round, if you want another $20 million in the second round...' It only happened in the period leading up to the state election, of course. This wasn't good policy; this was a desperate, failed attempt by the former Labor government at trying to get re-elected. It was a poor program, it was a poor use of resources and, when asked prior to the election, we unashamedly refused to give a commitment to wasting another $20 million on this particular program. Yes, it was stopped; it was a decision of the former Liberal Party opposition and now of the Marshall Liberal government. It was one made as Treasurer, that together, arm in arm and in lock step with the Premier and with my ministers, we are happy to defend and to support.

PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS
MEMBERS
GET INVOLVED
ABOUT PARLIAMENT
VISIT
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY
CONTACT