-
A
- Aback, Mr K.
-
Aboriginal Affairs
-
2015-11-19
- 2016-04-12
- 2017-06-01
-
-
Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation Agency
- Aboriginal Art and Culture
-
Aboriginal Artefacts
-
2016-03-24
- 2016-09-20
-
-
Aboriginal Constitutional Recognition
-
2016-05-25
-
2017-02-16
-
Question Time (9)
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
-
-
- Aboriginal Domestic Violence
-
Aboriginal Economic Development
-
2015-06-18
- 2016-06-21
- 2016-09-20
-
-
Aboriginal Employment Industry Clusters Program
-
2016-03-23
- 2016-05-26
- 2017-04-12
-
-
Aboriginal Employment Targets
-
Aboriginal Health
- 2015-05-13
-
2015-06-18
- 2015-10-28
- 2016-04-13
-
Aboriginal Heritage (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Aboriginal Heritage Act
- 2015-03-17
- 2016-03-23
- 2016-05-18
-
2016-06-23
-
2016-07-05
-
Answers to Questions (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
-
2016-07-26
- 2017-02-15
- 2017-06-21
- Aboriginal Land Rights
-
Aboriginal Lands Parliamentary Standing Committee
-
Aboriginal Lands Parliamentary Standing Committee: Annual Report 2014-15
-
Aboriginal Lands Parliamentary Standing Committee: Annual Report 2015-16
- Aboriginal Lands Parliamentary Standing Committee: Annual Report 201617
-
Aboriginal Language Interpreters and Translators
- Aboriginal Leadership
-
Aboriginal Music Studies
-
Aboriginal Power Cup
- 2015-06-17
- 2015-07-29
-
2016-05-24
- 2016-12-01
- Aboriginal Reconciliation
- Aboriginal Reference Group
-
Aboriginal Regional Authorities
- Aboriginal Regional Authority Policy
- Aboriginal Regional Communities
- Aboriginal Sports Training Academy
-
Aboriginal Tourism
-
2015-12-09
-
2016-11-02
-
-
Aboriginals Benefit Account
- Abortion
- Access Cabs
-
Address in Reply
- Adelaide Airport
- Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources and Management Board
- Adelaide Architecture
-
Adelaide Beer and BBQ Festival
- Adelaide Botanic High School
-
Adelaide City Skate Park
- Adelaide Crows AFL Women's Team
-
Adelaide Desalination Plant
- Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary
- Adelaide Fashion Festival
- Adelaide Festival of Arts
-
Adelaide Fringe
- Adelaide Gaol
-
Adelaide Gig City Program
- Adelaide Hilton Case
-
Adelaide International Bird Sanctuary
- Adelaide Lightning Women's Basketball Team
-
Adelaide Parklands
- 2015-06-03
- 2016-08-04
- 2016-11-16
-
2016-11-17
- 2016-11-30
- 2017-05-09
- Adelaide Pre-Release Centre
- Adelaide to Zero Carbon Challenge
-
Adelaide United Football Club
-
Adelaide Women's Prison
-
Adelaide Women's Prison, Firearms Delivery
-
2017-07-06
-
-
Adoption (Review) Amendment Bill
- Adult Community Education
- Adult Learners' Week
- Aerospace Alliance
-
AFL National Women's League
- Aged Care
- Aged Driver Self-Assessment
- Aged-Care Housing Developments
-
Agius, Auntie Josie
- Agricultural Landscape World Heritage Bid
-
Air Quality Standards
-
Alinta Energy
- Alliance for Research in Exercise Nutrition and Activity
-
Allwater Joint Venture
- Almond Industry
- Amazing Ambassador Campaign
- Amy Gillett Foundation
-
Anaesthetist Services
-
2017-11-29
-
-
Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights (Suspension of Executive Board) Amendment Bill
- Anglicare Foster Care
- Animal Welfare
-
Animal Welfare (Companion Animals) Amendment Bill
-
Animal Welfare (Greyhound Training) Amendment Bill
- Animal Welfare (Jumps Racing) Amendment Bill
-
Animal Welfare (Live Baiting) Amendment Bill
- Animal Welfare (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- Animals Australia
-
Annual Leave
-
2015-05-05
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2015-09-22
- 2015-12-09
-
- Annual Leave Liability
-
Answers Tabled
- 2015-03-17
- 2015-03-24
- 2015-03-25
- 2015-05-05
- 2015-05-06
- 2015-05-07
- 2015-05-14
- 2015-06-02
- 2015-06-16
- 2015-07-29
- 2015-07-30
- 2015-09-08
- 2015-09-10
- 2015-09-22
- 2015-09-23
- 2015-10-13
- 2015-10-14
- 2015-10-27
- 2015-11-17
- 2015-11-18
- 2015-12-01
- 2015-12-02
- 2015-12-08
- 2015-12-09
- 2016-03-08
- 2016-03-22
- 2016-03-24
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-04-13
- 2016-04-14
- 2016-05-17
- 2016-05-18
- 2016-05-24
- 2016-05-26
- 2016-06-08
- 2016-06-21
- 2016-06-22
- 2016-07-05
- 2016-07-06
- 2016-07-26
- 2016-07-27
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-09-21
- 2016-09-27
- 2016-10-18
- 2016-10-19
- 2016-11-01
- 2016-11-02
- 2016-11-15
- 2016-11-17
- 2016-11-29
- 2016-11-30
- 2016-12-01
- 2017-02-14
- 2017-02-15
- 2017-02-16
- 2017-02-28
- 2017-03-28
- 2017-03-30
- 2017-04-11
- 2017-05-09
- 2017-05-11
- 2017-05-18
- 2017-05-30
- 2017-06-01
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-06-21
- 2017-06-22
- 2017-07-06
- 2017-08-02
- 2017-08-03
- 2017-09-26
- 2017-10-17
- 2017-10-31
-
Answers to Questions
- Antibiotics Research and Development
-
ANZAC Day Commemoration (Veterans' Advisory Council) Amendment Bill
-
ANZAC Highway Bus Lanes
- Apiary Industry Fund
-
Apprentices and Trainees
- 2015-02-11
- 2015-07-30
-
2015-10-28
-
2015-10-29
- 2015-12-08
- 2016-05-26
-
Appropriation Bill 2015
- 2015-07-01
- 2015-09-08
- 2015-09-10
- 2015-09-22
-
2015-09-24
- 2015-10-13
-
Appropriation Bill 2016
-
Appropriation Bill 2017
- APY Artists
-
APY Elections
-
2015-06-17
- 2016-03-22
-
-
APY Executive
- 2015-05-05
-
2015-05-06
-
2015-12-10
- 2016-06-08
- 2016-11-01
-
2016-11-02
-
2017-06-22
-
2017-11-14
-
APY Lands
-
2015-02-11
- 2015-03-24
-
2015-09-09
- 2015-10-29
- 2015-12-08
-
2016-02-09
-
2016-04-13
-
2016-07-07
-
2016-10-19
-
2017-05-18
-
-
APY Lands Special General Meeting
- APY Lands, Bike SA Program
-
APY Lands, Child Ear Health
- APY Lands, Child Protection
-
APY Lands, Child Safety
-
2015-05-14
-
2015-10-29
- 2016-07-05
-
-
APY Lands, Consumer Rights DVD
-
APY Lands, Drivers' Licences
- 2015-05-05
-
2015-12-08
- APY Lands, Food Security
-
APY Lands, Governance
- 2015-02-10
- 2015-02-11
- 2015-02-12
-
2015-02-24
- 2015-02-25
-
2015-03-25
-
2015-05-07
- 2015-09-08
- 2016-03-22
-
2016-09-21
- 2017-11-29
-
APY Lands, Mental Health
-
APY Lands, Policing
-
2017-07-05
-
-
APY Lands, Regional Partnership Agreement
-
2016-09-20
- 2017-02-15
-
-
APY Lands, Renal Dialysis Units
-
APY Lands, Road Infrastructure
- APY Lands, Sport
- APY Lands, Street Naming
- APY Lands, Traineeships
- APY Lands, Watarru Community
-
APY Tjukurpa Law and Culture Council of Elders
-
2015-03-18
-
- Aquaculture Industry
- Arkaroola Protection Area
- Army Aboriginal Community Assistance Program
-
Arrium
-
2016-02-23
- 2016-03-09
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-05-17
- 2016-09-20
-
2016-09-22
-
2017-05-30
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (2)
-
- 2017-06-01
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-07-05
- 2017-08-02
-
- Artificial Reefs
-
Arts Funding
- 2015-07-29
- 2015-12-02
- 2016-03-23
-
2016-05-18
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (3)
-
- 2016-07-06
- 2016-12-07
- 2017-04-11
- Arts, Education and Lifestyle Choices
- Asbestos Containing Materials
-
Asbestos Waste Disposal
- 2016-02-10
-
2017-11-01
-
ASER (Restructure) (Facilitation of Riverbank Development) Amendment Bill
- Asia in SA
- Asia Pacific Whiskies and Spirits Conference
- Asian Cup
- Aspire Program Launch
- Asset Recycling Fund
- Assets Privatisation
-
Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act Review
-
Asylum Seekers
- Atkinson, Hon. M.J.
-
Auditor-General's Report
- Auditor-General's Report: Concessions Review
-
Auditor-General's Supplementary Reports
-
AusBiotech Conference
-
2017-10-31
-
-
Auslan Training
-
2015-03-19
-
-
Australia China Friendship Society
- Australia Day Honours
- Australia Japan Association of South Australia
- Australia-China Joint Economic Report
-
Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics
-
2016-06-23
- 2016-09-21
-
-
Australian Chinese Medical Association South Australia
- Australian Christian Churches Welfare Programs
- Australian Consensus Centre
- Australian Defence Force
-
Australian Energy Market Commission Establishment (Governance) Amendment Bill
- Australian Energy Market Operator Final Report
- Australian Energy Market Operator Report
- Australian Energy Market Operator Report Update
- Australian Football League Assaults
- Australian Information Industries Association Awards
-
Australian Labor Party Advertising
-
2017-05-10
-
- Australian Referendum, 1967
- Australian Services Union
- Australian Water Quality Centre
-
Automotive Industry
-
2015-02-10
- 2015-02-11
- 2015-02-12
-
2015-05-14
-
2015-06-30
- 2015-09-10
- 2015-10-15
- 2016-11-29
-
2017-03-28
-
2017-05-10
- 2017-08-10
- 2017-10-18
- 2017-10-19
- 2017-11-02
-
-
Automotive Supplier Diversification Program
- 2015-09-08
- 2015-09-09
- 2015-09-22
-
2015-09-24
- 2015-12-08
-
2016-02-11
- 2016-03-22
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-04-14
- 2016-05-24
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-11-01
- 2017-05-18
-
2017-10-17
- 2017-11-30
-
Automotive Transformation
- 2015-10-15
-
2015-11-18
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-05-26
- 2016-11-17
- 2017-02-15
-
2017-05-09
-
Automotive Transformation Scheme
-
Automotive Workers Communications Campaign
-
Automotive Workers in Transition Program
- 2015-06-17
- 2015-07-01
- 2015-07-02
- 2015-12-08
- 2016-03-24
- 2016-06-09
-
2016-09-20
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-10-18
-
2016-11-03
-
Question Time (13)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
-
- 2016-12-01
- 2017-02-16
- 2017-03-28
- 2017-04-11
-
2017-05-11
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2017-05-17
- 2017-05-30
-
AVL Technology
-
B
- Babcock Australia
- Bagot, Mr S. and Ms J.
-
Bail (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-08-03
- 2017-08-08
- 2017-08-10
-
2017-09-26
- Bail Accommodation Support Program
- Band of SA Police
- BankSA State Monitor
- Bannon, Hon. Dr J.C.
- Barossa Country Cabinet
-
Barossa Valley
- Barossa Valley Water Infrastructure
- Base64
- Battery Storage Initiative
- Battle of Pozières
- Bhutanese Australian Association of South Australia
- Bicameral Representation
- Bickford's Renmark Redevelopment
-
Biological Control (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- Bird Lake
-
Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration (Change of Name) Amendment Bill
-
Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration (Gender Identity) Amendment Bill
- Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration (Recognition of Same Sex Marital Status) Amendment Bill
- Bishop, Mrs L.
- Black April
- Black, Dr Q.
-
Blackout Emergency Procedures
- Blue Light
- Bob Such Memorial Scholarships
-
Body Image Campaign
-
2015-02-26
-
2015-03-18
-
2015-05-07
-
2015-07-29
-
Answers to Questions (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2016-02-23
- 2016-05-17
-
- Body Supplements
-
Boeing
- Boer War
- Bolster, Ms M.c.
- Bolton, Ms E.
- Booth, Mr D.g.
- Boral Linwood Quarry
-
Borderline Personality Disorder
- 2015-02-10
- 2015-07-29
- 2015-10-14
- 2015-12-09
-
2016-10-19
-
2017-09-28
-
Bordertown Community Early Flood Warning System
-
2016-09-20
- 2016-11-15
-
- Botanic Gardens of South Australia
- Bowering Hill Dam
-
BPW Adelaide Suffragette Dinner
-
2015-07-02
-
- Breastfeeding
- Brice, Corporal C.A.
- Bridges
-
Briggs, Prof. Freda
- Broadway, Ms R.a.
-
Broken Hill Water Supply
-
2016-06-21
-
- Brown
-
Brown Hill Keswick Creek Stormwater Project
- Brown, Mr V.J.
- Brumley Songwriting Exchange
- Buckland Park Development
-
Budget and Finance Committee
-
2015-02-10
-
Parliamentary Committees (2)
-
- 2015-07-29
- 2015-09-08
- 2015-09-09
- 2015-11-18
- 2016-07-06
- 2016-11-01
- 2016-11-30
- 2017-02-28
- 2017-08-09
- 2017-10-31
- 2017-11-29
- 2017-11-30
-
-
Budget and Finance Committee: Annual Report 2014-15
- Budget and Finance Committee: Annual Report 2015-16
- Budget and Finance Committee: Interim Report 2016-17
-
Budget Measures Bill 2017
- Budget Papers
- Buffel Grass
- Building and Construction Industry
-
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment (Review) Amendment Bill
- Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act Review
-
Building Family Opportunities
-
Building Upgrade Finance
-
Burke, Mr R.
- Burns Review
- Burra and Moonta Mines
-
Bushfire Action Week
-
2016-11-01
- 2017-03-28
-
-
Bushfire Preparedness
- 2015-11-17
- 2016-10-18
- 2016-11-15
-
2016-12-06
-
Bushfire Prevention
-
2016-10-20
-
- Business and Consumer Confidence
- Business Closures
- Business Confidence
- Business Entrepreneurs
-
Business Grants
-
2016-02-11
- 2016-11-17
-
- Business Migration
- Business Signage
-
Business Transformation Voucher Program
- 2015-02-12
- 2015-11-19
-
2015-12-09
-
2016-06-23
- 2016-07-05
- 2016-07-27
-
2016-10-19
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2017-03-29
-
C
-
C.S. Hare Centre
-
2016-02-23
-
2016-05-25
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
- Cabinet Documents
-
Cabinet Meetings
- Cadell Training Centre
- Californian Water Delegation
-
Campania Sports and Social Club
- Cannabis Arrests
-
Carbon Neutral Adelaide
- 2015-06-18
-
2015-12-02
- 2016-11-15
-
2016-12-01
-
2016-12-06
- 2016-12-07
- 2017-02-15
-
Carbon Neutral Cabinet
-
2015-02-10
- 2016-09-20
-
- Carbon Pricing
-
Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Review
-
Career and Workforce Development Centre
-
2015-03-24
-
2017-02-15
-
Question Time (9)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
-
-
2017-02-28
-
2017-04-11
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2017-05-16
- 2017-07-06
-
- Carers Week
-
Carnevale Italian Festival
- Caroma Workers
- Cashless Debit Card Trial, Ceduna
- Catalyst Research Grants
- Catchment to Coast Project
-
CCTV Cameras
- Ceduna
- Ceduna Aboriginal Support Services
-
Ceduna Waters
-
2015-02-11
- 2015-12-02
- 2016-07-27
-
- Central Eyre Peninsula Fire Management Plan
- Centre for Business Growth
-
Centre for Disability Health
-
Centrelink Debt Recovery System
-
Chamber Broadcasting
- Chamber Photography
- Character Preservation Acts
- Charities
-
Chemotherapy Treatment Error
- 2016-02-09
- 2016-02-24
- 2016-03-23
- 2016-06-07
- 2017-05-11
-
2017-11-15
-
Question Time (10)
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. J.S. LEE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. J.S. LEE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
-
-
2017-11-16
-
Chief Psychiatrist
-
2017-10-18
-
2017-11-30
-
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service
-
Child Development and Wellbeing Bill
-
Child Discipline
-
Child Protection
-
2015-05-05
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (3)
-
- 2015-06-03
- 2015-06-17
- 2016-06-07
-
2016-06-22
-
-
Child Protection Department
- Child Protection Screening
-
Child Protection Systems Royal Commission
- 2016-09-20
-
2016-11-29
-
Ministerial Statement (2)
-
- 2017-02-14
-
Child Safety (Prohibited Persons) Bill
- 2016-09-27
- 2016-10-18
- 2016-10-20
- 2016-11-01
-
2016-11-02
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2016-11-15
-
Children and Young People (Oversight and Advocacy Bodies) Bill
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-09-27
-
2016-10-18
- 2016-10-19
- 2016-11-01
-
Children and Young People (Safety) Bill
- Children in State Care
- Children with Disabilities
-
Children's Protection (Implementation of Coroner's Recommendations) Amendment Bill
-
Children's Protection Law Reform (Transitional Arrangements and Related Amendments) Bill
-
China Trade
- 2015-05-13
-
2015-06-02
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2015-06-18
- 2015-09-10
- 2015-11-18
- 2016-03-09
- China Trade and AFL Mission
- China Trade Mission
- China-Australia Free Trade Agreement
- Chinese Aged-Care Mission
-
Chinese Lunar New Year
-
Chinese Welfare Services of South Australia Inc.
- Chowilla Flood Plain
-
Circular Economy
- Citizen's Right of Reply
- City of Adelaide Clipper
- Civil Liability (Trespass) Amendment Bill
-
Clamping and Impounding Laws
-
Clare's Law
-
2015-12-01
-
-
Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Climate Change
-
2015-02-10
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
-
2015-02-12
- 2015-03-25
-
2015-05-05
- 2015-05-06
- 2015-07-29
- 2015-09-08
-
2015-09-23
- 2015-10-14
- 2015-12-01
- 2015-12-02
-
2016-03-23
-
2016-04-13
- 2016-07-26
- 2017-05-16
- 2017-06-22
- 2017-10-19
- 2017-11-01
-
- Climate Change Council
- Climate Change Strategy
- Clipsal 500
-
Clipsal 500 Tickets for Volunteers
-
2016-02-25
- 2016-04-14
-
- Close the Gap
- Clovercrest Baptist Church
- Co-Hab Tonsley
- Co-Management Workshop
- Coal Gasification
-
Cobbler Creek
-
Cobdogla Irrigation and Steam Museum
-
2015-02-10
-
-
Coca-Cola Amatil
-
2017-02-28
-
- Colonoscopy Services
-
Commencement
- 2015-02-10
- 2015-02-11
- 2015-02-12
- 2015-02-24
- 2015-02-25
- 2015-02-26
- 2015-03-17
- 2015-03-18
- 2015-03-19
- 2015-03-24
- 2015-03-25
- 2015-03-26
- 2015-05-05
- 2015-05-06
- 2015-05-07
- 2015-05-12
- 2015-05-13
- 2015-05-14
- 2015-06-02
- 2015-06-03
- 2015-06-04
- 2015-06-16
- 2015-06-17
- 2015-06-18
- 2015-06-30
- 2015-07-01
- 2015-07-02
- 2015-07-29
- 2015-07-30
- 2015-09-08
- 2015-09-09
- 2015-09-10
- 2015-09-22
- 2015-09-23
- 2015-09-24
- 2015-10-13
- 2015-10-14
- 2015-10-15
- 2015-10-27
- 2015-10-28
- 2015-10-29
- 2015-11-17
- 2015-11-18
- 2015-11-19
- 2015-12-01
- 2015-12-02
- 2015-12-03
- 2015-12-08
- 2015-12-09
- 2015-12-10
- 2016-02-09
- 2016-02-10
- 2016-02-11
- 2016-02-23
- 2016-02-24
- 2016-02-25
- 2016-03-08
- 2016-03-09
- 2016-03-10
- 2016-03-22
- 2016-03-23
- 2016-03-24
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-04-13
- 2016-04-14
- 2016-05-17
- 2016-05-18
- 2016-05-19
- 2016-05-24
- 2016-05-25
- 2016-05-26
- 2016-06-07
- 2016-06-08
- 2016-06-09
- 2016-06-21
- 2016-06-22
- 2016-06-23
- 2016-07-05
- 2016-07-06
- 2016-07-07
- 2016-07-26
- 2016-07-27
- 2016-08-04
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-09-21
- 2016-09-22
- 2016-09-27
- 2016-09-28
- 2016-09-29
- 2016-10-18
- 2016-10-19
- 2016-10-20
- 2016-11-01
- 2016-11-02
- 2016-11-03
- 2016-11-15
- 2016-11-16
- 2016-11-17
- 2016-11-29
- 2016-11-30
- 2016-12-01
- 2016-12-06
- 2016-12-07
- 2017-02-14
- 2017-02-15
- 2017-02-16
- 2017-02-28
- 2017-03-01
- 2017-03-02
- 2017-03-28
- 2017-03-29
- 2017-03-30
- 2017-04-11
- 2017-04-12
- 2017-04-13
- 2017-05-09
- 2017-05-10
- 2017-05-11
- 2017-05-16
- 2017-05-17
- 2017-05-18
- 2017-05-30
- 2017-05-31
- 2017-06-01
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-06-21
- 2017-06-22
- 2017-07-04
- 2017-07-05
- 2017-07-06
- 2017-08-02
- 2017-08-03
- 2017-08-08
- 2017-08-09
- 2017-08-10
- 2017-09-26
- 2017-09-27
- 2017-09-28
- 2017-10-17
- 2017-10-18
- 2017-10-19
- 2017-10-31
- 2017-11-01
- 2017-11-02
- 2017-11-14
- 2017-11-15
- 2017-11-16
- 2017-11-28
- 2017-11-29
- 2017-11-30
-
Commission of Inquiry on Water Pricing Bill
-
Commissioner for Children and Young People
-
Commissioner of Police
- 2015-03-19
- 2015-05-06
- 2015-07-01
- 2016-03-22
- 2016-07-05
-
2016-07-06
-
2016-11-15
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
2016-11-16
-
Commissioners for Aboriginal Engagement
-
2015-10-27
-
- Communities and Social Inclusion Department
- Communities and Social Inclusion Department Screening Unit
-
Community Based Sentences (Interstate Transfer) Bill
-
Community Engagement
-
2015-09-24
-
- Community Organisations
- Community Road Safety Fund
-
Compulsory Property Acquisitions
-
Compulsory Third Party Insurance Regulation Bill
- 2015-09-22
- 2015-09-23
- 2015-10-27
- 2015-10-29
- 2015-11-17
- 2016-04-12
-
2016-04-14
-
Bills (3)
-
- 2016-05-17
- Compulsory Third-Party Insurance
-
Concordia Development
- Conma Industries
-
Connecting Residents with Nature
-
2016-10-19
- 2017-02-14
-
- Conservation and Hunting Alliance
-
Constitution (Appropriation and Supply) Amendment Bill
-
Constitution (Council Member Contesting Election) Amendment Bill
-
Constitution (Deadlocks) Amendment Bill
-
Constitution (Demise of the Crown) Amendment Bill
-
Constitution (Electoral Redistribution) (Appeals) Amendment Bill
-
Constitution (Governor's Salary) Amendment Bill
-
Constitution (One Vote One Value) Amendment Bill
- 2017-09-28
-
2017-11-14
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2017-11-30
-
Constitutional Recognition
-
2015-07-01
-
-
Consultants and Contractors
-
2015-05-05
- 2015-06-02
- 2015-06-16
-
2015-09-08
- 2015-09-22
- 2015-10-14
-
-
Consumer and Business Services
- 2015-05-14
-
2015-10-29
-
Question Time (2)
-
- Consumer Education
-
Consumer Protection
-
Container Deposit Scheme
- Controlled Substances (Mandatory Treatment Orders) Amendment Bill
-
Controlled Substances (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Controlled Substances (Poppy Cultivation) Amendment Bill
-
Controlled Substances (Simple Possession Offences) Amendment Bill
- 2015-10-13
-
2015-10-29
- 2015-11-17
- 2015-12-01
-
Cooperative Research Centres
- Copper Mining
- Copper Mining Strategy
-
Corcoran, Mr M.
-
Coronial Inquest
- Coronial Report
-
Corporations (Commonwealth Powers) (Termination Day) Amendment Bill
-
Correctional Services (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Correctional Services (Parole) Amendment Bill
- Correctional Services Awards
-
Correctional Services Department
-
2016-11-01
-
2017-03-01
-
-
Correctional Services Industrial Dispute
-
Correctional Services Officers
-
Correctional Services, Forensic Patients
- Correctional Services, Reoffending Reduction
-
Correctional Services, Veterans
-
Cost of Living
-
Cost of Living Concession
- Council of Australian Governments
-
Council Rate Concessions
-
2015-03-19
- 2015-05-13
- 2015-09-23
-
-
Country Cabinet
-
Country Fire Service
- 2016-02-09
-
2016-02-10
- 2016-02-24
-
2016-03-23
-
Question Time (2)
-
- 2016-04-14
-
2016-06-07
-
2016-06-08
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-09-20
-
2016-11-02
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- Country Football
-
Country Health
-
2015-07-01
-
2017-11-15
-
- Country Press SA Awards
- Country Shows
-
Country Shows Funding
- Country to Canberra
-
Country Women's Association
-
2015-06-30
- 2015-09-08
- 2017-08-09
-
-
Cowdrey, Mr Matthew
- Cowper, Mr B.
- Cox, Ms H.J. MP
- Craft Guilds
-
Crime and Public Integrity Policy Committee
-
Crime and Public Integrity Policy Committee: Annual Review
- Crime and Public Integrity Policy Committee: Inquiry into the Serious and Organised Crime (Unexplained Wealth) Act 2009
-
Crime Statistics
- 2016-03-24
- 2016-06-08
-
2017-05-11
-
Criminal Assets Confiscation (Prescribed Drug Offenders) Amendment Bill
- 2015-02-26
- 2015-03-17
- 2015-03-24
- 2015-03-26
- 2015-09-08
- 2015-09-10
- 2016-02-23
- 2016-05-19
-
2016-06-22
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2016-06-23
- 2016-07-05
- 2016-07-06
- 2016-07-07
-
2016-07-27
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2016-08-04
- 2016-09-20
-
Criminal Law (Extended Supervision Orders) Bill
-
Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) (Blood Testing for Diseases) Amendment Bill
- Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) (Emergency Services Providers) Amendment Bill
-
Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Bill
-
Criminal Law (Sentencing) (Mandatory Imprisonment for Serious Domestic Violence Offenders) Amendment Bill
-
Criminal Law Consolidation (Assaults Causing Death) Amendment Bill
-
Criminal Law Consolidation (Children and Vulnerable Adults) Amendment Bill
-
Criminal Law Consolidation (Criminal Organisations) Amendment Bill
-
Criminal Law Consolidation (Defences - Domestic Abuse Context) Amendment Bill
-
Criminal Law Consolidation (Mental Impairment) Amendment Bill
- Criminal Law Consolidation (Protection for Assistance Animals) Amendment Bill
-
Criminal Law Consolidation (Provocation) Amendment Bill
- Criminal Law Consolidation (Supervision Requirements) Amendment Bill
- Criminal Organisations Legislation
-
Crown Land Management (Life Lease Sites) Amendment Bill
-
Crown Solicitor's Office
-
2017-05-17
-
- Cryptoparties
- Crystal Methamphetamine Task Force
- Cubesat
- Cummings, Mr Bart
- Cycling Citizens' Jury
-
Cycling Laws
-
2016-02-09
-
-
Cycling Regulations
- 2015-10-14
-
2015-10-28
-
Motions (3)
-
Question Time (1)
-
-
2016-02-24
- 2016-04-14
-
2016-05-17
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-11-30
-
Cycling Safety
-
2017-03-30
-
2017-08-02
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
-
Cycling Sector
-
2017-04-13
-
Question Time (7)
- The Hon. G.E. GAGO, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. M.C. PARNELL, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
-
-
-
Cycling Strategy
- Cyclone Relief Assistance
-
-
D
-
Dailler, Ms G.
-
Dairy Industry
- Dam Construction
-
Dardanelles Cenotaph
- Datacom
- Davenport Community Council
-
Davis, Mr Steve
-
Daw Park Site
- Day, Mr David John 'daisy'
- Daylight Saving
-
Decriminalisation of Sex Work
- 2017-07-06
-
2017-08-09
- Deer Industry Fund
-
Defence Industry
- Defence Industry Workforce Strategy
-
Defence Reserves Support Council (SA)
- Defence SA Chief Executive Appointment
-
Defence Shipbuilding
- 2015-02-10
- 2015-02-24
- 2015-06-03
- 2015-06-17
-
2015-07-02
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2016-03-23
-
2016-04-14
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2016-05-17
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2016-05-19
- Defence White Paper
- Dementia Care Facilities
-
Dental Services
-
Departmental Staff
- Deputy Police Commissioner
- Determined2
- Development Act
- Diabetes
-
Diamond House Clubhouse
-
Digital Roadmap
-
2017-11-02
-
- Direct Action Plan
-
Disability Accessibility
-
Disability and Education
- Disability Awareness
-
Disability Equipment
- Disability Equipment Service
- Disability Funding
-
Disability Housing
-
Disability Inclusion Bill
- Disability Reform Council
-
Disability SA
-
Disability Sector Employment
- Disability-Specific Toilet Facilities
-
Disabled Drivers
- 2017-05-11
-
2017-05-18
-
Question Time (2)
-
- Disaster Waste Management
- Diversity
- Dob in a Dodgy Tradie Day
-
Dob in a Litterer App
-
Dog and Cat Management
-
2015-03-26
- 2015-10-14
-
- Dog and Cat Management (Dog Attacks) Amendment Bill
-
Dog and Cat Management (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- 2015-11-18
- 2016-03-09
- 2016-03-10
- 2016-03-22
- 2016-03-23
- 2016-05-24
- 2016-05-26
- 2016-06-07
-
2016-07-05
-
Bills (2)
-
-
2016-07-06
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2016-07-26
-
Dog Fence (Payments and Rates) Amendment Bill
- Dolphin and Bird Sanctuaries
-
Domestic Violence
- 2015-02-11
- 2015-03-18
- 2015-05-06
- 2015-07-30
- 2016-05-18
-
2016-06-08
-
2016-06-09
-
Question Time (6)
-
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-11-02
- 2016-11-15
-
Domestic Violence Court Assistance Service
-
2015-06-30
-
-
Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme
- Domestic Violence Home Security
-
Domestic Violence Serial Offender Database
- 2015-03-18
-
2016-06-08
-
Dozynki Harvest Festival
- Driver, Archbishop J.W.
-
Drought Response
-
Drug and Alcohol Testing
-
Drug Detection Dogs
-
Drug Driving
- 2016-09-27
-
2016-11-02
-
2016-11-16
-
2017-08-03
-
Question Time (13)
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. M.C. PARNELL, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
-
- 2017-10-31
- Drug Offender Sentencing
- Drug Rehabilitation Centres
-
Drug-Related Crime
- 2017-07-05
-
2017-08-09
-
Drug-Related Sentencing
-
2017-02-14
- 2017-06-01
-
- Drugs in Prisons
-
Duck Hunting Season
- Dutch Community
-
-
E
-
Early Commercialisation Fund
-
Eating Disorders Association of South Australia
- 2016-02-25
- 2016-05-17
-
2017-03-28
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- Economic Plan
- Ediacara Conservation Park
-
Education and Children's Services Bill
-
Eggs (Display for Retail Sale) Bill
-
Elder Abuse
- Elder Electorate
-
Elective Surgery
-
2017-09-28
-
2017-10-18
-
2017-11-14
-
-
Electoral (Candidate Declarations) Amendment Bill
-
Electoral (Funding, Expenditure and Disclosure) Amendment Bill
-
Electoral (Legislative Council Voting and Other Measures) Amendment Bill
- Electoral (Legislative Council Voting Thresholds) Amendment Bill
-
Electoral (Legislative Council Voting) (Voter Choice) Amendment Bill
- Electoral (Legislative Council) (Optional Preferential Voting) Amendment Bill
-
Electoral (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Electoral Commissioner
- Electricity (Feed-In Pricing) Amendment Bill
-
Electricity Prices
- Electronic Crime
- Electronic Monitoring Enhancements
-
Electronic Transactions (Legal Proceedings) Amendment Bill
-
Emergency Departments
- Emergency Management
-
Emergency Management (Australian Sign Language Interpreter) Amendment Bill
-
Emergency Management (Electricity Supply Emergencies) Amendment Bill
-
Emergency Management (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Emergency Services
-
2015-02-11
-
Motions (2)
-
-
2015-02-25
- 2016-05-18
-
2016-05-19
- 2016-06-23
- 2016-09-20
-
2016-09-21
- 2016-11-30
-
2017-05-31
-
-
Emergency Services Disaster Planning
-
2015-03-17
-
-
Emergency Services Levy
- 2016-03-10
-
2016-09-21
- 2016-11-17
-
2017-03-28
- 2017-03-30
-
Emergency Services Volunteer Recruitment
- Emergency Services, Kingdom of Tonga
- Emergency Warning
- Emissions Reduction Targets
-
Employment Figures
-
2015-02-12
- 2015-03-26
- 2015-06-30
-
2015-12-08
- 2016-02-23
- 2016-03-22
- 2016-03-24
- 2016-06-09
- 2017-11-16
-
- Employment Growth Forecasts
-
Employment Participation Rate
-
2017-06-22
-
- Employment, Higher Education and Skills Minister
-
Endometriosis
- Energy Legislation
-
Energy Market
-
Energy Prices
- 2015-03-26
- 2015-07-02
-
2015-12-09
- Energy Security
- Energy Security Target
-
Entertainment Centre and Convention Centre Boards
- Entrepreneurial Education Initiatives
-
Entrepreneurs Week
- 2015-02-10
- 2016-06-07
-
2017-07-05
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
-
Environment Protection (Waste Reform) Amendment Bill
-
Environment Protection Authority
- 2015-09-08
- 2016-03-10
-
2016-06-22
- Environment Protection Authority (Air Quality) Policy
-
Environment Protection Authority Air Quality Policy
-
2016-02-24
-
Question Time (7)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. M.C. PARNELL, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
-
-
- Environment Protection Bilateral Agreement
-
Environment, Resources and Development Committee
-
Environment, Resources and Development Committee: Biodiversity
-
Environment, Resources and Development Committee: Report 2016-17
-
Environment, Water and Natural Resources Department
-
Environment, Water and Natural Resources Department Chief Executive
- 2015-03-25
-
2015-03-26
- 2015-07-29
- Environment, Water and Natural Resources Department Contractors
-
Environment, Water and Natural Resources Department Fire Management
- 2015-09-09
-
2015-10-28
-
2016-02-09
- 2016-03-24
-
Environmental Degradation
-
2015-07-30
-
-
Environmental Liabilities
-
2016-09-20
-
- Environmental Sensitivities
-
Environmental Volunteers
-
2015-05-14
-
2015-06-17
-
- Environmental Water Allocations
- Epilepsy
- Epilepsy Centre
-
Equal Opportunity Commission
-
2017-05-09
- 2017-10-31
-
-
Ethan Automotive
-
2015-06-18
-
- Europe Defence Mission
-
Eurovision Song Contest
-
Evidence (Journalists) Amendment Bill
-
Evidence (Records and Documents) Amendment Bill
-
Extreme Weather Conditions
-
2016-09-27
-
2016-09-29
-
Ministerial Statement (4)
-
Question Time (9)
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. J.M. GAZZOLA, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
-
- 2016-10-18
-
2017-05-31
- 2017-08-03
- 2017-09-28
-
- Eyre Peninsula Grain Growers Rail Fund
- Eyre Peninsula Water Supply
-
Eyre Western Crime Statistics
-
2017-06-01
-
-
-
F
- Faecal Microbiota Transplant Service
- Fair Trading Act
-
Fair Work (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Family Relationships (Parentage Presumptions) Amendment Bill
-
Family Relationships (Surrogacy) Amendment Bill
- Family Tax Benefits
- Far West Mojo
- Farm Debt Mediation
-
Farm Debt Mediation Bill
- Farm Finance Package
-
Federal Budget
-
2015-05-13
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
- 2015-07-01
-
2017-05-10
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2017-06-21
- 2017-06-22
-
-
Federal Election
-
Federal Funding
- 2015-05-06
-
2017-05-18
- Federated Gas Employees Industrial Union
- Female Entrepreneurship
-
Female Genital Mutilation
- 2015-10-14
- 2015-12-09
-
2017-02-28
- 2017-04-12
-
2017-05-30
- Festa
-
Festival Plaza Redevelopment
- Festivals Adelaide Report
-
Filipino Settlement Coordinating Council of South Australia
- Financial Technology
-
Fines Enforcement and Debt Recovery Bill
- 2017-09-27
- 2017-09-28
- 2017-11-14
- 2017-11-16
-
2017-11-30
-
Fire and Emergency Services (Volunteer Charters) Amendment Bill
- Fire Danger Ratings
-
Fire Management Plans
-
2015-11-17
-
2015-12-02
-
2016-04-12
-
2016-04-13
- 2016-04-14
-
2016-07-06
- 2016-09-20
-
-
Firearms Amnesty
-
Firearms Bill
- Firearms Legislation
-
Firearms Licences
- Firearms Reform
-
Firing Range Safety
-
2017-07-06
-
2017-08-08
- 2017-11-15
-
- Fishcare Australia
- Fisheries Management (Fish Processors) Amendment Bill
- Flexibility for the Future Program
-
Flinders Medical Centre
- 2017-08-08
-
2017-11-29
-
Flinders Medical Centre Hydrotherapy Services
-
Flinders University
-
Flood Relief Operations
- Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
- Foodbank SA
- Forced Marriage
-
Forensic Mental Health
-
Forensic Services Review
- 2017-05-11
-
2017-05-18
-
Forestry Industry
-
2016-06-09
- 2016-09-20
-
2017-06-22
-
- ForestrySA
- Forrest Review
-
Fort Largs
-
2016-06-08
- 2016-09-20
-
-
Fraser, Hon. J.M.
-
Free Trade Agreements
-
Free-Range Eggs
-
2015-02-10
- 2015-03-18
- 2015-05-07
- 2015-05-12
- 2015-09-08
-
2016-02-23
- 2016-03-10
-
- Freebairn, Mr J.S.
-
Freedom of Information (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- French Defence Visit
- Fresh 92.7
- Friends of Parks Inc.
- FrogWatch SA
-
Frome Street Bikeway
-
Fruit Fly
- FRUSIC
- Fukushima Nuclear Disaster
- Fund Our Future
-
Fur Seals
- 2015-06-02
-
2015-07-30
-
2015-10-27
- 2016-02-10
- 2016-04-12
- Future Industries Institute
-
G
- Gambling Review
-
Gaming Machines (Prohibition of EFTPOS Facilities) Amendment Bill
-
Gawler Business Development
-
2017-03-28
-
-
Gawler River Flooding
- Gender Pay Equality
-
Gender Policy
-
2015-09-24
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
-
Gene Technology (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
General Motors Holden
-
Genetically Modified Crops Management Regulations (Postponement of Expiry) Bill
-
George's Corner
-
2016-05-25
-
- German Club
- Gift Cards
-
Gig City Network
-
Gillman Land Sale
-
Global Gig City Network
-
Global Warming
- GM Holden
- GM Holden Site
-
GM Holden Workers
-
2017-10-19
- 2017-11-02
-
-
Goods and Services Tax
- 2015-05-12
-
2015-12-10
-
2016-02-09
-
2016-02-10
- Government Appointments
- Government Campaign Spending
-
Government Consultants
-
2016-03-22
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-03-23
- 2016-04-12
-
-
Government House Precinct Land Dedication Bill
- 2015-12-01
- 2016-02-10
-
2016-02-25
- 2016-03-08
- Government Invoices and Accounts
- Government Land
- Government Procurement
-
Government Radio Network
-
2016-02-09
- 2016-05-17
-
2016-09-29
- 2016-11-16
-
-
Governor's Speech
- Goyder Institute Climate Projections
- Grain Harvest
-
Granite Island
- Granite Island Penguin Colony
- Great Australian Bight
- Green Car Transformation Scheme
- Green Industries SA
-
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Targets
- Greens' Solar Energy Policy
- Greenwood, Dr J.
-
Greyhound Racing
-
2015-02-24
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
-
2015-09-22
- 2015-10-28
-
2015-10-29
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-07-07
- 2016-07-27
- 2016-09-21
- 2016-11-17
-
-
Greyhounds, Export
-
2017-05-30
-
Question Time (8)
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
-
-
-
Greywater Compliance
-
2015-06-17
-
Question Time (2)
-
- 2015-12-02
-
- Griffin, Hon. K.T.
- Groovin the Moo
- Groundwater Contamination
-
H
-
Hallett Cove Pipeline
-
Hampstead Rehabilitation Centre
-
2017-11-15
-
- Hanson Bay
- Hanson, Hon. J.E.
- Haydon, Mr M.R.
- Headstone Project
-
Health and Community Services Complaints (Budget Report) Amendment Bill
-
Health and Community Services Complaints (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- Health and Hospital Care
-
Health Budget
-
2015-07-02
-
-
Health Care (Administration) Amendment Bill
-
Health Care (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- Health Care (Privacy and Confidentiality) Amendment Bill
- Health Care (Private Day Procedure Centres) Amendment Bill
-
Health Portfolios
-
2017-09-27
-
-
Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (South Australia) (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (South Australia) (Remote Area Attendance) Amendment Bill
- 2017-10-18
- 2017-10-19
-
2017-11-28
-
Health Review
-
2015-02-25
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Motions (1)
-
-
-
Henley Beach Police Station
- Hewitt, Mr Lleyton
-
High Risk Foot
-
Higher Education
-
Highgate Park
-
Highgate Park Disability Services
-
Hills Limited
- Hillside Mine
- Hindley Street Incident
-
Historic Shipwrecks (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
HIV
-
2015-05-06
- 2016-11-02
- 2016-11-30
-
2016-12-01
- 2017-03-30
-
-
Hive 12-Twenty Five
- Holden Exhibition
-
Home Detention
-
2016-05-17
-
2016-05-19
-
2016-11-01
-
Question Time (6)
-
- 2016-11-02
-
2016-12-07
- 2017-02-15
- 2017-02-16
- 2017-03-28
-
- Home Invasions
- Homeless Funding Arrangements
-
Homeless Women
- HomeStart Finance
-
Homosexual Convictions Apology
-
Hong Kong-Australia Business Association
- Horticulture Industry
- Hospital Management Investigation
-
Hospitality Group Training
-
House Fires
-
2017-05-31
- 2017-08-03
-
- House of Songs Project
-
Housing Affordability
-
2017-05-31
-
- Housing and Homelessness Funding
-
Housing Improvement Bill
- 2016-03-08
- 2016-03-10
- 2016-05-17
- 2016-05-19
- 2016-07-07
- 2016-07-26
-
2016-07-27
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2016-09-20
- Housing SA
-
Housing Trust
-
2015-12-08
-
-
Human Organs Trafficking
-
Hungarian Club of SA
-
Hurn, Mr B.
- Hutt St Centre
-
Hydrotherapy Services
-
2017-10-17
-
2017-11-16
-
-
-
I
- Iap2 Core Values Awards
-
Ice Addiction
- 2015-09-23
-
2016-07-07
- 2016-10-20
-
2016-11-02
-
Ice Taskforce
-
ID Scanners
-
Iga Warta
-
2016-07-07
- 2016-09-20
-
-
Ikara-Flinders Ranges National Park
-
Illicit Drugs
- 2015-03-25
- 2015-11-18
-
2015-12-02
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2015-12-08
- 2016-07-06
- 2016-08-04
- 2016-09-28
- 2016-12-07
- 2017-05-10
-
Illicit Substance Abuse
- Immigration Detention
- Income Inequality
- Independent Commissioner Against Corruption
-
Independent Commissioner Against Corruption (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Independent Commissioner Against Corruption (Serious Or Systemic Misconduct Or Maladministration) Amendment Bill
- Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Annual Report 2014-15
- Independent Gambling Authority
- India Business Mission
- India Trade
-
Indian Australian Association of South Australia
- Indigenous Advancement Strategy
-
Indigenous Incarceration
- Indigenous Land Use Agreement
- Indigenous Referendum Council
- Indigenous STEM Education
- Indigenous Tourism
-
Indigenous Tourism Strategies
-
2016-10-20
-
-
Indigenous Women, Incarceration
-
2016-10-19
-
- Indigenous Youth Incarceration
- Indonesian Justice System
-
Indulkana Community Policing
-
2016-09-22
- 2017-02-14
-
-
Industrial Hemp
- 2015-07-01
-
2017-03-01
-
2017-09-27
- 2017-11-15
-
Industrial Hemp Bill
-
Industry Advocate Bill
-
Industry Leaders Groups
-
2015-05-13
- 2015-09-09
-
-
Infant Formula Sales
- Information and Communications Technology
- Infrastructure Spending
- Ingkatji, Mr K.
-
Inkerman Landfill Facility
-
2017-10-19
-
-
Inner City Street Crew
-
Innes National Park
-
2015-05-14
-
- Innovation in South Australia
-
Innovation Voucher Program
- 2015-06-03
-
2017-04-11
- 2017-05-10
- 2017-05-11
-
2017-05-30
- 2017-08-02
- Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing
- Integration of Carbon and Energy Policy
-
Intensive Home Based Support Service
-
2015-10-15
-
-
International Astronautical Congress
- International Centre for Financial Services
- International Centre of Excellence in Water Resources Management
-
International Christian Faith Persecution
- International Day of People with Disability
-
International Education
- International Education Ministerial Advisory Council
- International Research Grant Program
-
International Students
- International Women's Day
- International Workers' Memorial Day
-
International Year of Pulses
-
Intervention Orders (Prevention of Abuse) (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Intervention Orders (Prevention of Abuse) (Recognition of National Domestic Violence Orders) Amendment Bill
-
Invasive Image Distribution
-
2015-06-30
-
- Investment Attraction Agency
-
Inviting the World to Walk Through Our Door
- Ionic Industries
-
J
- Jackson, Aunty Elsie
- James Morrison Academy of Music
- Jamie Larcombe Centre
-
Job Creation
-
2015-03-17
-
2015-10-14
- 2015-10-15
-
2015-11-18
- 2015-12-08
-
- JOBEX
- Jobs and Export Program
-
Joint Committee on Findings of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission
-
Joint Committee on Matters Relating to Elder Abuse
- 2017-05-10
- 2017-05-17
-
2017-10-31
-
Parliamentary Committees (2)
-
-
2017-11-01
-
Motions (1)
-
Parliamentary Committees (2)
-
-
Joint Committee on the Operation of the Transplantation and Anatomy Act 1983
-
Joint Parliamentary Service Committee
-
Judicial Administration (Auxiliary Appointments and Powers) (Qualification for Appointment) Amendment Bill
-
Judicial Conduct Commissioner (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Judicial Conduct Commissioner Bill
- 2015-06-02
- 2015-06-18
- 2015-06-30
- 2015-07-30
-
2015-09-08
-
Bills (2)
-
-
2015-11-17
-
Jumps Racing
- 2015-05-12
-
2015-05-14
-
Personal Explanation (1)
-
Resolutions (1)
-
- Juries (Auslan Interpreters) Amendment Bill
-
Juries (Prejudicial Publicity) Amendment Bill
-
Justices of the Peace (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- Juvenile Fire Lighters Intervention Program
-
K
- Kangaroo Creek Dam Upgrade
-
Kangaroo Island
- Kangaroo Island Airport
- Kangaroo Island Middle River Catchment
- Kangaroo Island Natural Resources
-
Kangaroo Island Wilderness Trail
-
2015-03-19
-
2016-10-20
- 2017-02-14
-
- KESAB Sustainable Communities Awards
- Khapra Beetle
-
Kingston SE Boat Ramp
-
2017-11-02
-
2017-11-15
-
- Kirner, Hon. J.E.
- Kokoda Commemoration Service
- Krix Speaker Systems
-
L
- Labor Government
-
Labor Members of Parliament
-
Labor Party
-
Labour Hire Licensing Bill
- Labour Hire Practices
- Labour Hire Practices, D'vineripe
- Labour Hire Workers
-
Lake Albert-Coorong Connector
-
2015-07-30
-
- Lake Bonney
-
Land Acquisition
-
2015-02-11
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2015-05-14
-
-
Land Agents (Registration of Property Managers and Other Matters) Amendment Bill
-
Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) (Beneficial Interest) Amendment Bill
- Land Services SA
- Land Tax
-
Lands Titles Office
-
Late Night Trading Code of Practice
- Latex Allergy
- Latvian Business Delegation
- LaunchME
-
Le Cornu Site
- Leaders' Retreat
-
Legacy
-
Legal Aid
- Legal Assistance Sector
-
Legal Practitioners (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Legal Services Commission (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Legislative Council Vacancy
-
Legislative Review Committee
- 2015-02-11
- 2015-02-25
- 2015-03-18
- 2015-03-25
- 2015-05-06
- 2015-05-13
- 2015-06-03
- 2015-06-17
- 2015-07-01
- 2015-07-29
- 2015-09-09
- 2015-09-23
- 2015-10-14
- 2015-10-28
- 2015-12-02
- 2016-02-10
- 2016-02-24
- 2016-03-08
- 2016-03-09
- 2016-03-23
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-04-13
- 2016-05-18
- 2016-05-25
- 2016-06-08
- 2016-06-22
-
2016-07-05
-
Parliamentary Committees (2)
-
- 2016-07-06
- 2016-07-27
- 2016-09-21
- 2016-09-28
- 2016-10-18
- 2016-10-19
- 2016-11-16
- 2017-02-15
- 2017-02-28
- 2017-03-01
- 2017-03-29
- 2017-04-12
- 2017-05-10
- 2017-05-17
- 2017-05-31
- 2017-06-21
- 2017-07-04
- 2017-07-05
- 2017-08-02
- 2017-08-09
- 2017-09-26
- 2017-09-27
- 2017-10-17
- 2017-10-31
- 2017-11-01
- 2017-11-29
- Legislative Review Committee: Amendment to the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Regulations 2011 to Enable the Recognition of De Facto Relationships on the Register Recording the Death of a Person (Death Certificate)
- Legislative Review Committee: Annual Report 2015
- Legislative Review Committee: Annual Report 2016
-
Legislative Review Committee: Graffiti Control (Miscellaneous) Amendment Act
-
Legislative Review Committee: Partial Defence of Provocation
- Legislative Review Committee: Review of the Report into the Partial Defence of Provocation
- Legislative Review Committee: Sexual Reassignment Repeal Bill
-
Leigh Creek
-
2015-09-08
- 2015-10-13
- 2015-10-15
- 2015-11-17
- 2015-11-18
-
2016-02-11
- 2016-06-07
-
2016-06-09
- 2016-10-19
- 2016-11-01
-
- Lend Lease
- Lensink, Hon. J.M.A.
- Lester, Mr Yami
- Levitzke, Mr V.
- Lewis, Hon. I.P.
-
LGBTIQ Community
-
2016-06-22
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Motions (1)
-
- 2016-07-06
-
- LGBTIQ Law Reform
- Library Committee
-
Limestone Coast
-
2015-12-01
-
-
Limitation of Actions (Child Sexual Abuse) Amendment Bill
-
Linear Parks (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Liquor Licensing
-
2015-05-05
- 2017-03-01
- 2017-05-11
-
-
Liquor Licensing (Entertainment on Licensed Premises) Amendment Bill
- Liquor Licensing (Entertainment) Amendment Bill
-
Liquor Licensing (Liquor Review) Amendment Bill
-
Liquor Licensing (Prohibition of Certain Liquor) Amendment Bill
- Liquor Licensing (Small Venue Licence) Amendment Bill
- Literacy and Numeracy
- Live Music Industry
- Livestock Theft
-
Lobbyists Bill
-
Local Government
-
Local Government (Accountability and Governance) Amendment Bill
-
Local Government (Boundary Adjustment) Amendment Bill
-
Local Government (Building Upgrade Agreements) Amendment Bill
- Local Government (Elections) (Disclosure of Political Affiliation) Amendment Bill
-
Local Government (Fixed Charges) Amendment Bill
-
Local Government (Gawler Park Lands) Amendment Bill
-
Local Government (Mobile Food Vendors) Amendment Bill
- Local Government (Rate Increases) Amendment Bill
-
Local Government (Stormwater Management Agreement) Amendment Bill
-
Local Nuisance and Litter Control (Illegal Dumping on Construction Sites) Amendment Bill
-
Local Nuisance and Litter Control Bill
- Lone Pine
-
Long Service Leave
-
Long Service Leave (Calculation of Average Weekly Earnings) Amendment Bill
- Long Service Leave Liability
-
Low Carbon Economy Experts Panel
-
2015-12-02
-
- Low Carbon Economy Strategy
- Low Carbon Investment Plan
-
Low Emission Vehicle Strategy
-
Low-Flow Bypass Systems
- 2016-12-07
- 2017-02-14
-
2017-03-02
-
2017-11-28
-
Lower Limestone Coast Water Allocation Plan
-
2015-03-26
- 2015-09-10
-
2015-09-22
-
2015-10-15
-
2016-05-17
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-05-26
-
- Loy Yang Power Station
-
LR&M Constructions
-
Lucas, Hon. R.I.
-
Lyell McEwin Hospital
-
M
- Mack, Private Miller
-
Macular Degeneration
-
2015-02-11
- 2015-05-07
-
- Mad March Late Night Public Transport
-
Magistrates Court (Monetary Limits) Amendment Bill
- Malaysian-Chinese School Delegation
- Malinauskas, Hon. P
- Malinauskas, Hon. Peter
-
Mallee Prescribed Wells Area
-
2016-05-26
-
-
Manufacturing Industries
-
Manufacturing Sector
-
2015-03-18
- 2015-06-04
- 2016-10-20
-
2017-07-04
-
- Manufacturing Technology
- Manufacturing Technology Centre
-
Manufacturing Works
- 2015-11-17
-
2015-12-08
- 2016-09-20
-
2017-06-01
-
Manufacturing Works Review
-
2017-05-30
- 2017-06-21
-
2017-07-05
-
- Mapland
- Maralinga Tjarutja Lands
-
Marine Park Sanctuary Zones
-
Marine Parks
- 2015-06-18
-
2015-09-09
- 2015-09-23
-
2017-04-12
-
2017-07-04
- 2017-08-08
-
Marriage Equality
- 2015-06-03
- 2015-06-17
- 2015-10-28
- 2015-11-18
- 2016-06-08
-
2017-02-15
-
Marryatville High School Library
-
Martindale Hall
-
MassChallenge
- MATES in Construction
- Matter of Privilege
- Mclafferty, Mr J.
- McLaren Districts Lions Club
- McLaren Vale and Districts War Memorial Hospital
- McLaren Vale Police Station
- Meat and Livestock Australia Advertisement
- Media Chamber Access
- Media Standards
-
Medical Cannabis
- 2015-05-05
- 2015-05-07
- 2015-06-17
-
2015-10-14
-
Motions (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2015-10-28
- 2016-05-18
-
2017-03-01
-
2017-03-28
-
2017-03-29
-
2017-05-10
- 2017-05-17
- 2017-10-18
- Medical Device Industry
-
Medical Records
-
2016-03-10
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
- Medical Research
-
Medical Students
-
Medical Technologies Program
-
Medical Treatment Consent
-
Medicinal Cannabis Symposium
-
2017-04-13
-
- Member for Elder
- Member for Mawson
-
Member for Mount Gambier
-
2017-09-28
-
Question Time (3)
-
-
- Member for Waite
-
Member, Swearing in
-
Member's Leave
- Member's Remarks
- Members Pairing
- Members' Behaviour
-
Members' Conduct
- 2015-02-24
-
2015-07-30
-
Question Time (2)
-
- Members' Remarks
-
Memories of Lemnos
-
Mental Health
-
Mental Health (Review) Amendment Bill
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-05-19
- 2016-06-09
- 2016-06-21
- 2016-06-23
-
2016-07-05
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2016-07-26
-
Mental Health Audit
-
Mental Health Commission
- Mental Health Commissioner
- Mental Health Funding Cuts
-
Mental Health Plan
-
Mental Health Services
-
2017-11-16
-
Question Time (6)
-
- 2017-11-29
-
-
Methamphetamine Harm Reduction
-
Metropolitan Fire Service
-
2016-06-07
-
2016-07-07
- 2016-11-01
-
2017-06-01
- 2017-07-04
- 2017-08-03
-
-
Metropolitan Parks
-
Micro Finance Fund
- 2015-03-24
- 2015-05-13
- 2015-05-14
-
2015-07-01
-
2015-07-02
- 2015-10-13
- 2015-12-08
- 2015-12-09
-
2015-12-10
-
2016-02-11
- 2016-03-08
- 2016-05-26
- 2016-09-20
-
Micro-X
-
2017-03-30
-
2017-08-03
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
- Mid-Year Budget Review
- Middle River Reservoir
- Millhouse, Hon. R.R.
- Minecraft Competition
- Mineral and Energy Resources
-
Mining Employment
-
2015-06-17
-
2015-09-10
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-02-10
-
- Minister for Investment and Trade
-
Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation
-
2016-11-29
-
Question Time (8)
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.S. LEE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
-
-
2016-11-30
-
-
Minister's Remarks
-
Ministerial Code of Conduct
-
2015-10-15
-
2016-11-29
-
- Ministerial Liaison Officers
-
Ministerial Staff
-
2015-05-07
- 2016-03-24
- 2016-09-20
-
2017-11-29
-
-
Ministerial Travel
-
2015-05-05
-
2015-07-29
-
Matters of Interest (2)
-
-
2015-09-08
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
2015-09-09
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Question Time (3)
-
- 2015-10-13
-
2015-10-29
- 2015-11-18
- 2016-11-01
-
- Mintabie Township
-
Mobile Black Spot Program
-
2016-04-13
-
2016-06-21
- 2016-12-01
-
2016-12-06
-
Question Time (7)
-
-
2016-12-07
- 2017-05-16
-
-
Mobilong Prison
-
Modbury Hospital
-
Modbury Hospital Cardiology Services
-
Molinara Social and Sports Club
-
Monarto Transport Hub
-
2017-05-16
-
- Moomba Gas Supply Hub
- Moonta Police Station
-
Morrison, Mr W.
- Moss Rocks
-
Motivation Australia
-
Motor Accident Commission
-
Motor Vehicle Accident Injury Schemes
- Motor Vehicles (Demerit Points for Disability Parking Area Offence) Amendment Bill
- Motor Vehicles (Suitability to Hold Licence) Amendment Bill
-
Motor Vehicles (Trials of Automotive Technologies) Amendment Bill
-
Motor Vehicles Act
-
2016-03-09
-
Motions (2)
-
-
-
Motorcycle Lane Filtering
-
2017-03-29
- 2017-08-02
-
- Mount Compass Area School
- Mount Compass Lions Club
-
Mount Gambier Prison
-
2016-02-11
-
- Mount Gambier Ultrafast Internet
- Mount Lofty Botanic Garden Poppy Blitz
-
Mount Serle Station
- Multi-Agency Protection Service
- Multicultural Youth SA Film Event
- Multicultural Youth SA Incorporated
-
Municipal and Essential Services Program
- 2015-03-19
-
2016-05-25
- 2016-10-18
-
2016-12-07
- 2017-03-30
- Murder Investigation
- Murray
- Murray Bridge Employment Opportunities
-
Murray River
-
Murray-Darling Basin
-
Murray-Darling Basin Plan
-
2015-02-10
-
2015-05-07
- 2015-09-22
-
2015-11-18
- 2016-11-29
-
2016-12-01
- 2017-03-02
- 2017-06-21
-
2017-08-02
-
Matter of Urgency (1)
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
- 2017-08-08
- 2017-08-10
- 2017-09-27
- 2017-11-02
- 2017-11-16
-
-
Murray-Darling Basin Regional Economic Diversification Program
-
2015-03-18
-
- Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission
-
Music Development Office
-
Music Industry
- Music Royalties
-
N
-
NAIDOC Week
- 2016-07-05
- 2016-07-07
- 2017-07-05
-
2017-07-06
-
National Apology Anniversary Breakfast
- National Carp Control Plan
- National Day of Action Against Nuclear Waste Dumps
-
National Disability Awards
-
National Disability Insurance Scheme
-
National Electricity (South Australia) (Australian Energy Regulator - Wholesale Market Monitoring) Amendment Bill
-
National Emergency Access Target
-
National Gas (South Australia) (Pipelines Access-Arbitration) Amendment Bill
- National Housing and Homelessness Agreement
- National Ice Action Strategy Funding
-
National Parks
-
2015-03-17
- 2015-05-06
- 2015-11-17
- 2015-12-02
-
2016-11-03
-
2016-11-17
- 2017-03-02
- 2017-04-11
-
-
National Parks and Wildlife
-
National Parks and Wildlife (Co-Managed Parks) Amendment Bill
-
National Parks and Wildlife (Life Lease Sites) Amendment Bill
- National Parks Online Booking System
- National Partnership Agreement on Remote Housing
-
National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform
-
2015-06-02
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2015-06-03
- 2015-06-04
-
- National Police Remembrance Day
- National Reconciliation Week
- National Road Safety Week
-
National School Chaplaincy Program
- National Science Week
- National Servicemen's Association of Australia
- National Volunteer Week
-
National Water Initiative
-
2016-02-23
-
2016-02-25
- 2016-03-09
-
- National Women's Soccer Team
-
Native Vegetation
- Native Vegetation Act
- Natural Disaster Recovery Assistance
-
Natural Gas Authority (Notice of Works) Amendment Bill
-
Natural Resources Committee
- Natural Resources Committee: Alinytjara Wilurara Regional Fact-Finding Trip
- Natural Resources Committee: Annual Report 2014-15
- Natural Resources Committee: Annual Report 2015-16
- Natural Resources Committee: Annual Report 2016-17
-
Natural Resources Committee: Fleurieu and Kangaroo Island Regional Fact Finding Visit
- Natural Resources Committee: Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Region
- Natural Resources Committee: Levy Proposals 2015-16
- Natural Resources Committee: Levy Proposals 2017-18
- Natural Resources Committee: Marine Scalefish Fishery, Summary of Evidence 2014-2017
-
Natural Resources Committee: Natural Resources South Australia Business Plans and Regional Levies 2016-17
- Natural Resources Committee: Northern and Yorke Regional Fact Finding Visit
- Natural Resources Committee: Pinery Fire Fact-Finding Trip
- Natural Resources Committee: Regional Report, March 2014-April 2016
-
Natural Resources Committee: Sustainable Prawns Fisheries Management
-
Natural Resources Committee: Unconventional Gas (Fracking)
-
Natural Resources Management (Regional NRM Levy) Amendment Bill
-
2016-11-16
-
- Natural Resources Management (Transparency of Ministers Directions) Amendment
- Natural Resources Management Act 2004
- Natural Resources Management Boards
-
Natural Resources Management Levy
- 2015-10-27
-
2016-03-08
-
2016-05-18
-
Question Time (9)
- The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
-
-
2016-05-26
- 2016-07-05
-
2016-11-01
- Natural Resources Management Staff
- Nature Play SA
-
Nature-Based Tourism
-
2016-02-23
- 2016-09-20
-
2017-08-03
- 2017-10-17
-
- Neighbourhood Watch
- Neil Sachse Foundation
- Nepal Delegation
- Neudeck, Dr Rupert
-
Newstart Allowance
- Ngarkat Conservation Park
- No Dump Alliance
- No Strings Attached Theatre of Disability
-
Noarlunga Hospital
-
Noarlunga TAFE
-
2015-02-12
-
2015-02-26
-
-
Nobel Prize Winners
- North-East Water Supply
-
Northern Adelaide Food Park
-
2015-07-01
-
2015-10-29
-
2016-02-09
- 2016-03-22
-
2016-05-24
-
2016-07-27
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-11-02
- 2017-03-28
-
2017-05-17
-
2017-06-20
- 2017-07-04
-
2017-10-17
-
-
Northern Adelaide Irrigation Scheme
-
2015-11-19
- 2016-04-12
-
2017-04-11
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2017-06-01
-
2017-07-06
-
-
Northern Connector
- 2015-07-01
- 2015-09-22
- 2015-10-13
-
2016-11-17
-
Northern Economic Plan
- 2015-02-26
- 2015-06-30
-
2015-09-23
-
2015-10-15
-
2016-02-09
-
Question Time (7)
-
-
2016-02-10
-
2016-02-23
-
Question Time (9)
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. T.T. NGO, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.A. DARLEY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
-
-
2016-02-24
-
2016-02-25
-
2016-03-08
-
2016-03-09
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2016-03-10
-
2016-03-23
- 2016-04-12
-
2016-05-19
- 2016-05-26
-
2016-06-07
-
2016-06-08
-
2016-06-21
- 2016-07-06
- 2016-07-26
- 2016-07-27
-
2016-11-03
- 2016-11-17
- 2017-03-01
- 2017-03-30
-
2017-05-10
-
2017-05-17
-
2017-06-01
- Northern Entrepreneur Growth Program
-
Northern Entrepreneur Growth Scheme
-
2017-05-10
-
2017-05-30
-
-
Northern Sound System
-
Notaries Public Bill
-
Nu-Rock Technology
-
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Citizens' Jury
-
2016-10-19
-
2017-03-28
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
-
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission
-
Nuclear Industry
-
2015-02-10
-
2015-02-11
-
-
Nuclear Safety
-
Nuclear Waste
-
2015-02-10
- 2015-11-18
- 2015-11-19
- 2015-12-09
- 2016-02-24
- 2016-03-08
- 2016-03-10
-
2016-04-13
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
2016-05-17
- 2016-05-18
- 2016-07-26
- 2016-09-27
- 2016-10-19
- 2016-10-20
- 2016-11-03
-
2016-11-15
-
Question Time (8)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. M.C. PARNELL, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. M.C. PARNELL, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
-
-
2016-11-16
-
Question Time (8)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
-
-
2016-11-17
-
Question Time (7)
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. M.C. PARNELL, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
-
- 2017-03-28
-
-
Nuclear Waste Dump
- 2015-12-10
-
2016-09-20
- Nuclear Waste Storage Facility (Prohibition) (Public Money) Amendment (2017) Bill
-
Nuclear Waste Storage Facility (Prohibition) (Public Money) Amendment Bill
- Nurses Health and Safety Service
-
-
O
-
O-Bahn
-
O-Bahn Tunnel
- Oak Valley Aboriginal Community Water Supply
-
Oakden Mental Health Facility
- 2017-03-28
- 2017-05-09
- 2017-05-16
-
2017-05-17
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Motions (1)
-
Question Time (5)
-
- 2017-05-18
- 2017-05-30
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-08-09
- 2017-11-15
- 2017-11-29
-
Oaklands Estate Groundwater Contamination
-
Occupational Licensing National Law (South Australia) Repeal Bill
-
Office of the Training Advocate
-
2015-10-27
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
- Office Upgrade, Department of the Premier and Cabinet
- Offshore Patrol Vessels
- Oil Exploration
-
Older Persons Mental Health Service
-
2017-10-19
-
- Older Women and Poverty
-
On-Farm Irrigation Efficiency Program
-
Onkaparinga SES
- Online Betting Tax
-
Open State
- Operation Flinders
- Our Energy Plan
-
Our Jobs Plan
- Our Lady of the River School
-
Overseas Chinese Association of South Australia
- Overseas Goods Exports
-
-
P
- Paddy, Mrs Kunmanara
- Pages Flat Road
- Paint the Parks and Gardens Read Program
-
Palestine
- Palliative Care Services
-
Papers
- 2015-02-10
- 2015-02-11
- 2015-02-12
- 2015-02-24
- 2015-02-25
- 2015-02-26
- 2015-03-17
- 2015-03-19
- 2015-03-24
- 2015-03-25
- 2015-03-26
- 2015-05-05
- 2015-05-06
- 2015-05-07
- 2015-05-12
- 2015-05-13
- 2015-05-14
- 2015-06-02
- 2015-06-04
- 2015-06-16
- 2015-06-18
- 2015-06-30
- 2015-07-01
- 2015-07-02
- 2015-07-29
- 2015-07-30
- 2015-09-08
- 2015-09-09
- 2015-09-22
- 2015-09-23
- 2015-09-24
- 2015-10-13
- 2015-10-14
- 2015-10-15
- 2015-10-27
- 2015-10-28
- 2015-10-29
- 2015-11-17
- 2015-11-18
- 2015-11-19
- 2015-12-01
- 2015-12-02
- 2015-12-03
- 2015-12-10
- 2016-02-09
- 2016-02-10
- 2016-02-11
- 2016-02-23
- 2016-02-24
- 2016-02-25
- 2016-03-08
- 2016-03-22
- 2016-03-24
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-04-14
- 2016-05-17
- 2016-05-19
- 2016-05-24
- 2016-05-25
- 2016-05-26
- 2016-06-07
- 2016-06-09
- 2016-06-21
- 2016-06-23
- 2016-07-05
- 2016-07-07
- 2016-07-26
- 2016-07-27
- 2016-08-04
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-09-21
- 2016-09-27
- 2016-09-29
- 2016-10-18
- 2016-10-19
- 2016-10-20
- 2016-11-01
- 2016-11-02
- 2016-11-03
- 2016-11-15
- 2016-11-16
- 2016-11-17
- 2016-11-29
- 2016-11-30
- 2016-12-01
- 2016-12-06
- 2017-02-14
- 2017-02-16
- 2017-02-28
- 2017-03-01
- 2017-03-02
- 2017-03-28
- 2017-03-30
- 2017-04-11
- 2017-04-13
- 2017-05-09
- 2017-05-11
- 2017-05-16
- 2017-05-18
- 2017-05-30
- 2017-06-01
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-06-21
- 2017-06-22
- 2017-07-04
- 2017-07-06
- 2017-08-02
- 2017-08-03
- 2017-08-08
- 2017-08-10
- 2017-09-26
- 2017-09-27
- 2017-09-28
- 2017-10-17
- 2017-10-18
- 2017-10-19
- 2017-10-31
- 2017-11-02
- 2017-11-14
- 2017-11-15
- 2017-11-16
- 2017-11-28
- 2017-11-29
- 2017-11-30
-
Para Wirra Conservation Park
-
Para Wirra Recreation Park
-
Paris Climate Change Agreement
- 2016-11-03
-
2017-03-28
-
Paris Climate Change Conference
- Paris Terrorist Attacks
- Park Lands Zone Development Plan Amendment
- Parks Week
-
Parliament (Joint Services) (Staffing) Amendment Bill
- Parliamentary Budget Advisory Service
-
Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation
- Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: 67 is the New 40
-
Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Annual Report 2014-15
- Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Annual Report 2015-16
- Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Annual Report 2016-17
- Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Barossa Valley Visit
- Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Hillgrove Resource Group Mine and Kanmantoo Quarry
- Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Home Care of South Australians with a Disability and Elderly South Australians
-
Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Return to Work Act and Scheme
-
Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Riverland Visit
- Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Work Health and Safety (Industrial Manslaughter) Amendment Bill
- Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Work Related Mental Disorders and Suicide Prevention
- Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Work, Health and Safety (Industrial Manslaughter) Amendment Bill
- Parliamentary Committee on Occupational Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation: Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation (SACFS Firefighters) Amendment Bill
- Parliamentary Committees (Electoral Laws and Practices Committee) Amendment Bill
-
Parliamentary Committees (Public Assets Committee) Amendment Bill
- Parliamentary Procedure
-
Parliamentary Reform
-
2015-02-11
-
-
Parliamentary Remuneration (Determination of Remuneration) Amendment Bill
- Passenger Transport (Expiry of Point to Point Transport Service Transaction Levy) Amendment Bill
-
Passenger Transport (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- Passengers in History
-
Pastoral Board
- Pastoralists Stewardship Program
- Patient Records
- Payne, Hon. R.G.
- Payroll Tax
- Pelican Point Upgrade
- Penalty Rates
- Perfection Fresh
-
Petroleum and Geothermal Energy (Underground Coal Gasification) Amendment Bill
- Pfizer
-
Photonics
-
Pinery Bushfires
-
2015-12-01
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
-
2015-12-10
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2016-02-10
- 2016-03-22
- 2016-05-18
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-11-17
-
2016-11-29
- 2017-03-28
-
-
Pinery Bushfires, Council Fees
- Place, Ms Beverley
- Planning and Development Process
-
Planning Reform
- 2015-03-25
-
2015-09-08
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
Planning, Development and Infrastructure (Promoting Use of Vacant Land) Amendment Bill
-
Planning, Development and Infrastructure (Regulated Trees) Amendment Bill
-
Planning, Development and Infrastructure (State Planning Commission) Amendment Bill
-
Planning, Development and Infrastructure (State Planning Policy) (Biodiversity) Amendment Bill
-
Planning, Development and Infrastructure Bill
- 2015-11-18
-
2015-12-01
- 2015-12-02
-
2015-12-03
-
2015-12-08
-
2015-12-09
-
2015-12-10
- 2016-02-09
-
2016-02-11
- 2016-02-23
- 2016-02-24
-
2016-02-25
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2016-03-08
-
2016-03-09
- 2016-03-22
-
2016-03-23
- 2016-03-24
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-05-17
- Plastic Free July
- Plastics Granulating Services
- Poker Machine Documentary
- Polaris Centre
-
Police (Drug Testing) Amendment Bill
-
Police (Return to Work) Amendment Bill
- 2015-10-14
-
2015-11-18
-
Bills (3)
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD, The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. J.A. DARLEY, The Hon. T.T. NGO, The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE
-
-
Police Aerial Operations
-
2017-08-10
-
- Police Boards
-
Police Cadet Graduation
-
2016-02-11
- 2016-04-14
-
-
Police Cadets
-
Police Civilianisation
-
Police Complaints and Discipline Bill
- 2016-09-27
- 2016-10-18
- 2016-11-17
-
2016-12-01
- 2017-02-16
-
Police Corporate Programs
-
2017-02-14
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
- Police Dog Operations Unit
- Police Foundation Day
-
Police Holding Facilities
-
2017-03-30
-
-
Police Officer of the Year Award
-
2017-05-30
- 2017-08-02
-
-
Police Ombudsman
-
Police Recruitment
-
2016-07-27
-
2016-11-16
-
2016-11-17
-
Question Time (7)
- The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
-
-
2017-02-15
-
-
Police Response Times
-
2016-03-22
-
-
Police Search and Arrest Powers
-
Police Staffing
- 2015-05-07
-
2016-03-08
-
Question Time (9)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
-
-
2016-03-10
-
2016-03-22
-
2017-05-31
- Police Staffing, Riverland
-
Police Stations
- 2016-03-08
-
2016-03-22
-
2016-05-25
-
2016-11-15
-
2017-03-30
-
2017-05-17
- 2017-08-02
-
Police Technology Upgrades
- Police Traffic Targets
-
Police Workers Compensation
-
2017-05-09
-
2017-05-10
-
-
Police Workplace Injury Claims
- Police, Licensing Enforcement Branch
-
Police, Sexual Harassment
-
2017-08-08
- 2017-08-09
-
- Political Advertising
- Pollock, Mr J.
-
Population Growth
-
2017-06-01
-
- Port Augusta
-
Port Augusta Country Cabinet
-
Port Augusta Fly Ash
-
Port Augusta Prison
-
Port Augusta Solar Thermal Storage
- Port Elliot Show
-
Port Gawler Conservation Park
-
Port Pirie Racecourse Site Amendment Bill
- Port Pirie Regional Council
- Port River and Barker Inlet
- Portfolio Responsibilities
-
Positive Life SA
- Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Centre for Excellence
- Poverty in Australia
- Powdered Alcohol
-
Power Infrastructure
-
2016-11-03
-
-
Power Outages
-
2016-09-29
- 2016-10-18
- 2016-10-19
- 2016-10-20
-
2016-11-16
- 2016-12-01
- 2017-09-27
-
-
Power Outages, SA Water
-
Power Outages, Telecommunications
-
2016-09-29
-
Question Time (7)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
-
- 2017-02-15
-
- Power Plant Purchase
-
Power Supply
- Power Supply, Fossil Fuel
- Pre-Poll Votes
- Premier's Council for Women
-
Premier's Research and Industry Fund
-
Prescribed Burns
-
2017-10-19
-
- Prescribed Scale of Costs
- President's Ruling
- Prevention and Early Intervention for the Development and Wellbeing of Children and Young People Bill
- Principal Community Visitor
-
Printing Committee
-
Prison Administration
- 2016-11-02
- 2016-11-30
-
2017-03-02
-
2017-04-13
- 2017-07-04
- 2017-08-02
-
Prison Facilities
-
2017-05-09
-
2017-05-16
-
- Prison Industries
-
Prison Violence
- Prisoner Art Exhibition
- Prisoner Drug Rehabilitation
-
Prisoner Mail Screening
-
2016-11-02
-
2017-02-14
-
-
Prisoner Numbers
-
2016-09-27
-
Question Time (7)
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
-
-
2016-09-28
- 2016-11-30
-
2017-02-16
-
-
Prisoner Rehabilitation
- 2017-02-16
-
2017-05-31
-
2017-08-03
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
Prisoner Reoffending
-
Prisoner Support and Treatment
-
2016-04-13
-
2016-05-19
-
2016-05-25
-
2016-05-26
-
2016-06-23
-
2016-07-06
-
2016-08-04
-
2016-09-27
- 2016-09-28
-
2016-10-19
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2016-11-01
- 2016-11-02
-
2016-11-15
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
2016-11-30
- 2017-02-14
- 2017-03-28
- 2017-10-31
-
-
Prisoner Transfers
-
2016-09-28
- 2016-11-30
- 2017-03-30
-
-
Prisons
-
Private Hospital Admissions
-
2016-06-09
-
2016-10-18
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
- Private Training Providers
-
Privatisation
-
2017-10-18
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
-
-
Probate Fees
-
Proclamation of South Australia Anniversary
- Product Safety
- Productivity Commission Report
- Prorogation
-
Prospect Ambulance Station
-
Prospect Development Plan
-
Proton Beam Therapy Unit
-
Public Finance and Audit (Treasurer's Instructions) Amendment Bill
- Public Integrity
-
Public Interest Disclosure Bill
- 2016-09-27
- 2016-10-18
- 2016-11-17
- 2017-02-15
- 2017-03-29
- 2017-05-09
- 2017-05-11
-
2017-05-30
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2017-05-31
-
2017-06-01
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-06-21
- 2017-06-22
- 2017-07-04
- 2017-07-05
- 2017-07-06
- 2017-08-02
- 2017-08-03
-
2017-08-08
- 2017-08-09
- 2017-08-10
- 2017-09-26
- 2017-09-27
- 2017-09-28
- 2017-10-17
- 2017-10-18
- 2017-10-19
- 2017-10-31
-
Public Intoxication (Review Recommendations) Amendment Bill
-
Public Sector (Data Sharing) Bill
- 2016-09-21
- 2016-09-22
- 2016-10-20
- 2016-11-15
-
2016-12-01
-
Bills (3)
-
- 2017-02-16
-
Public Sector (Functions and Resources Audit) Amendment Bill
-
Public Sector Employment
- 2015-03-19
- 2015-07-01
- 2015-07-29
-
2015-09-23
-
2016-11-17
-
Question Time (2)
-
- 2017-02-16
-
Public Sector Entitlements
-
Public Sector Executive Officers
-
Public Sector Executive Salaries
- 2015-10-27
-
2015-12-09
- 2015-12-10
- Public Sector Recruitment
- Public Service
- Public Service Appointments
-
Public Service Employees
-
2015-05-05
- 2015-09-22
- 2015-09-24
- 2015-11-17
- 2015-12-01
- 2016-11-17
-
- Public Service Leave
-
Public Service Performance
-
2016-09-20
- 2016-09-22
- 2017-02-14
-
-
Public Service Short-Term Contracts, Trainees and Graduates
-
2015-09-08
-
Answers to Questions (14)
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
-
-
-
Public Transport Concessions
- Purchase Card Expenditure
-
Pyle, Ms Jillian
-
2015-11-18
-
2015-12-03
-
-
Q
-
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
- 2015-03-25
- 2016-02-24
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-04-14
- 2016-09-27
- 2016-11-03
-
2017-09-28
-
2017-11-14
-
2017-11-16
-
2017-11-28
- Queen Elizabeth Ii
-
Queen's Birthday Honours
- Queensland Cyclone Recovery Assistance
-
-
R
-
Racism
- Radio Adelaide
-
Rail Safety National Law (South Australia) (Miscellaneous No 2) Amendment Bill
-
Rail Safety National Law (South Australia) (Miscellaneous No 3) Amendment Bill
-
Rail Safety National Law (South Australia) (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Rainbow Flag
-
2015-10-27
-
- Rajasthan Sister-State Relationship
- Rape Culture
- Raw Milk
- Raymond, Ms J.
-
Real Property (Electronic Conveyancing) Amendment Bill
-
Real Property (Priority Notices and Other Measures) Amendment Bill
-
Reclink Australia
- Record Store Day
-
Recreational Fishing
-
2016-06-21
-
2016-11-01
- 2017-08-08
- 2017-09-27
-
- Red Balloon Day
-
Red-Light Cameras
-
Referendum (Appropriation and Supply) Bill
-
Referendum (Deadlocks) Bill
-
Referendum (One Vote One Value) Bill
- Refugee Week
- Regional 3r Forum
- Regional Business Innovation
- Regional Capability Community Fund
- Regional Care That Matters
- Regional Climate Change Adaptation Plans
-
Regional Development Fund
-
2015-10-28
- 2016-05-19
-
-
Regional Employment
- Regional Science Education
- Regional South Australia
-
Relationships Register (No 1) Bill
- Religious Discrimination
-
Remote Aboriginal Communities, Electricity Infrastructure
-
Renewable Energy
- Renewable Energy and Clean Technology
-
Renewable Energy Initiatives
- Renewable Energy Summit
- Renewable Energy Target
-
Repatriation General Hospital
-
2015-09-10
- 2015-11-18
- 2015-11-19
-
2016-05-26
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-11-01
-
2017-09-27
-
2017-10-18
- 2017-11-29
-
- Research and Development Corporations
- Research Fellowships
-
Research, Development and Innovation Bill
-
Reservoir Management
-
2016-09-21
-
2016-09-28
-
- Reservoir Recreational Fishing
-
Reservoirs
- Residential Parks (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- Residential Tenancies (Databases) Amendment Bill
-
Residential Tenancies (Domestic Violence Protections) Amendment Bill
-
Residential Tenancies (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
Resource Operations Ombudsman Bill
- Resource Recovery
-
Retail and Commercial Leases (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
- Retail and Commercial Leases (Rent Threshold for Application of Act) Amendment Bill
- Retirement Villages
-
Retirement Villages Bill
-
Return to Work (Weekly Payments Under Transitional Provisions) Amendment Bill
-
Return to Work Act
-
Return to Work Corporation of South Australia (Crown Claims Management) Amendment Bill
- Return to Work Scheme
- Returned and Services League Programs
-
ReturnToWorkSA
- Ride2work Day
- Right on Crime
- Right to Farm
-
Right to Farm Bill
-
Rigney, Dr Alice
-
Rigney, Mr R.G.
-
2016-07-26
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (7)
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
-
- 2016-09-21
- 2016-11-01
- 2017-02-15
-
-
Rio Olympic and Paralympic Games
- Rio Paralympics
-
River Torrens
- Riverbank Precinct
-
Riverine Recovery Project
-
2017-11-15
-
- Riverland Career Development Centre
- Riverland Domestic Violence Services
- Riverland Education and Employment
- Riverland Storm Damage
- Road Awareness Program
-
Road Maintenance
-
2016-12-06
-
2017-08-03
-
-
Road Safety
- 2016-03-23
-
2016-06-08
- 2016-07-26
- 2016-07-27
-
2016-11-02
- 2016-11-17
-
Road Safety Education
-
Road Safety Petition
- Road Traffic (Helmets) Amendment Bill
-
Road Traffic (Issue of Free Tickets by Parking Ticket-Vending Machines) Amendment Bill
-
Road Traffic (Roadworks) Amendment Bill
-
Road Traffic Act
-
2016-03-09
-
- Robert Stigwood Fellowship Program
-
Rossi Boots
-
2017-05-11
-
- Rotary Club of Burnside
- Rotary District 9500
-
Royal Adelaide Beer and Cider Awards
-
2016-07-27
-
2016-10-19
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
-
Royal Adelaide Hospital
- 2015-07-30
- 2016-02-25
- 2016-03-22
- 2016-06-07
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-09-28
- 2016-11-16
- 2017-05-09
- 2017-05-10
- 2017-09-26
- 2017-09-27
-
2017-10-18
- 2017-10-19
-
2017-11-01
- Royal Adelaide Hospital Construction Site Incident
- Royal Adelaide Hospital Construction Site Incidents
-
Royal Adelaide Hospital Gynaecological Services
-
Royal Adelaide Hospital Outpatient Medical Imaging
-
2017-10-17
-
- Royal Adelaide Hospital Pain Management Unit
- Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment
- Royal Air Force Bomber Command
-
Russell, Dr D.
-
-
S
- S. Kidman & Co.
- SA Dairy Awards
- SA Health Facilities, Accessibility
- SA Health Staff
-
SA Pathology
- SA Tourism Awards
-
SA Water
- 2015-02-10
- 2015-02-11
-
2015-05-06
-
2015-11-18
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2015-11-19
-
2016-03-09
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2016-03-10
-
2016-04-14
-
Answers to Questions (1)
-
Question Time (3)
-
-
2016-05-17
-
Answers to Questions (1)
-
Question Time (12)
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.S. LEE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
-
- 2016-05-18
- 2016-05-19
-
2016-05-24
-
Question Time (10)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.A. DARLEY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.A. DARLEY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
-
- 2016-05-26
-
2016-06-07
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2016-06-22
-
2016-07-06
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-09-22
- 2016-12-06
- 2017-02-16
-
2017-02-28
- 2017-03-28
- 2017-04-11
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-06-21
-
2017-10-17
- 2017-11-02
-
SA Water Charges
-
2015-02-25
-
-
SA Water Customer Satisfaction Research
-
SA Water Infrastructure
-
2016-03-09
-
2016-03-22
-
2016-05-17
-
2016-09-21
-
2016-09-22
- 2016-10-20
- 2016-12-06
- 2017-03-01
- 2017-04-11
- 2017-05-11
- 2017-05-18
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-08-10
-
-
SA Water Reconciliation Action Plan
- SA Water, New Technologies and Systems
- SA/NT First Ministers' Forum
- Safe Haven Legislation
-
Safe Schools Program
- SAFECOM Staffing Levels
- SafeWork SA
-
SafeWork SA, Workplace Fatalities
-
SAGASCO
- SAGE Automation
-
Salisbury Police Station
-
2016-03-10
- 2016-03-24
-
2016-06-23
-
-
Sampson Flat and Tantanoola Bushfires
- 2015-02-10
-
2015-02-11
- 2015-02-12
- 2015-02-25
- 2015-05-06
- 2015-05-13
- 2015-09-24
-
Sampson Flat Bushfire
- 2015-09-10
-
2016-02-23
- 2016-04-14
-
Sand Carting
-
Sandmining
-
2016-04-12
-
- Saragarhi Remembrance Day
- Sarawak Rainforest
-
Save the River Murray Fund
-
2015-02-11
-
2016-05-18
-
-
Save the River Murray Levy
- School Natural Resources Management Action Grants
- School Transport Policy
- Schools Code of Conduct
- Science
- Science Alive
-
Science Research and Innovation
-
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics
- Seal Bay Conservation Park
- Seal Bay Visitor Centre
-
Seatbelt Buckle Guards
-
Seaweed Harvesting
- 2015-03-24
- 2015-07-29
-
2015-09-24
-
Select Committee on Access to the South Australian Education System for Students with Disabilities
-
Select Committee on Administration of South Australia's Prisons
- Select Committee on Administration of South Australia’s Prisons
-
Select Committee on Chemotherapy Dosing Errors
-
Select Committee on Compulsory Acquisition of Properties for North-South Corridor Upgrade
-
Select Committee on Electoral Matters in South Australia
-
Select Committee on Emergency Services Reform
-
Select Committee on Sale of State Government Owned Land at Gillman
-
2015-02-10
-
Parliamentary Committees (2)
-
- 2015-07-29
- 2015-11-18
- 2016-07-06
- 2016-11-30
- 2017-02-28
- 2017-08-09
- 2017-11-29
-
-
Select Committee on Skills for All Program
-
Select Committee on State Government's O-Bahn Access Project
- Select Committee on State-Wide Electricity Blackout and Subsequent Power Outages
-
Select Committee on Statewide Electricity Blackout and Subsequent Power Outages
-
Select Committee on Statutes Amendment (Decriminalisation of Sex Work) Bill
-
Select Committee on Statutory Child Protection and Care in South Australia
-
Select Committee on Transforming Health
- 2015-11-18
- 2015-12-01
- 2015-12-02
- 2015-12-08
- 2016-02-25
- 2016-05-25
- 2016-06-08
- 2016-07-06
- 2016-11-15
-
2016-11-30
-
Parliamentary Committees (2)
-
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-06-21
- 2017-08-09
- 2017-09-27
- 2017-10-17
- 2017-11-28
- 2017-11-29
- Self-Managed Superannuation Fund Retirement Course
-
Senate Vacancy
- 2015-09-10
-
2017-11-01
- Members
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Senator, Election
- Seniors Housing Grant
-
Sentencing Bill
- 2017-03-01
- 2017-03-02
- 2017-05-16
- 2017-05-18
- 2017-06-01
- 2017-06-20
- 2017-06-22
-
2017-07-06
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2017-08-02
- Sessional Committees
-
Sex Industry Reform
-
2015-07-29
-
- Sex Work Laws
- Sexism and Rape Culture
-
Sexual Orientation Discrimination
-
Shack Sites
- 2015-03-24
- 2015-05-13
-
2015-09-08
-
2015-09-10
- Shandong-South Australia Action Plan
- Shared Services
-
Shark Cage Diving
-
2015-05-05
- 2015-09-08
-
2015-09-23
- 2016-04-14
-
-
Shop Distributive and Allied Employees' Association
- Sia Furler Institute for Contemporary Music and Media
-
Significant Trees
- Simulation Hub
-
SinoSA House
-
Site Contamination, Beverley
-
2015-06-16
-
-
Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park
-
2015-02-24
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (3)
-
-
- Site Contamination, Thebarton
-
Sittings and Business
-
2015-07-30
-
Parliamentary Procedure (2)
-
- 2015-09-22
- 2015-09-23
- 2015-12-01
- 2015-12-02
- 2015-12-03
- 2015-12-08
- 2015-12-09
-
2015-12-10
-
Parliamentary Procedure (2)
-
- 2016-02-10
- 2016-02-11
- 2016-02-25
- 2016-03-09
- 2016-03-10
- 2016-03-23
- 2016-03-24
- 2016-07-27
- 2016-09-28
-
2016-10-20
- 2016-11-03
- 2016-11-30
- 2016-12-01
- 2016-12-06
-
2016-12-07
-
Parliamentary Procedure (2)
-
- 2017-02-15
-
2017-03-01
-
Motions (1)
-
Parliamentary Procedure (1)
-
- 2017-03-02
- 2017-05-09
- 2017-05-31
- 2017-06-01
- 2017-06-22
- 2017-07-05
-
2017-07-06
-
Parliamentary Procedure (2)
-
- 2017-10-18
- 2017-10-19
- 2017-11-01
- 2017-11-14
- 2017-11-15
- 2017-11-16
- 2017-11-28
- 2017-11-29
-
2017-11-30
-
Parliamentary Procedure (2)
-
-
-
Skill Shortages
-
Skilled Migrants
-
2017-04-12
-
2017-08-02
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
- Skills and Employment Websites
-
Skills for All
- 2015-02-24
-
2015-02-25
-
2015-02-26
-
2015-03-24
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
2015-05-05
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2015-05-13
-
Motions (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
-
2015-06-03
- 2015-07-29
- 2015-09-10
-
2015-10-13
-
Question Time (12)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
-
-
2015-12-02
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
Skills for Jobs in Regions
-
2015-07-29
-
- Sleep Clinic
- Small Business Commissioner
-
Small Business Development Fund
-
2016-04-13
-
2016-05-17
-
2016-05-18
- 2016-09-21
- 2017-03-30
-
-
Small Business Roundtable
- Small Business Statement
-
Social Development Committee
-
Social Development Committee: Comorbidity
-
Social Development Committee: Domestic and Family Violence
- Social Development Committee: Inquiry into Regional Health Services
- Social Development Committee: Regional Health Services
- Social Media
-
Society of Saint Hilarion
- Solar Citizens
- Solar Energy
- Solar Thermal Electricity Generation
-
Solid Waste Levy
-
2016-07-05
- 2016-07-06
-
-
South Australia Police
- 2015-11-18
-
2016-02-10
-
2016-02-11
-
2016-02-24
- 2016-03-22
-
2016-03-24
-
2016-04-12
- 2016-04-14
-
2016-05-24
-
2016-05-26
- 2016-06-21
-
2016-07-05
-
2016-07-07
- 2016-07-26
-
2016-07-27
-
Question Time (7)
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
-
-
2016-08-04
- 2016-09-20
-
2016-11-01
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-11-02
- 2016-11-03
-
2016-11-15
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
- 2016-11-16
- 2016-12-01
- 2017-02-15
-
South Australia Police 801 Group
- 2017-03-29
-
2017-11-01
-
South Australia Police Corporate Programs
- South Australia-South East Asia Engagement Strategy
- South Australia's Women's Economic Empowerment Blueprint
- South Australian Amputee Limb Scheme
- South Australian Certificate of Education Board
-
South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
- South Australian Cooperatives
-
South Australian Country Press Awards
- South Australian Early Commercialisation Fund
-
South Australian Economy
- 2015-11-18
-
2016-12-07
-
South Australian Employment Tribunal (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill
-
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
- South Australian Integrated Land Information System
- South Australian Music Awards
- South Australian Music Industry
- South Australian National Football League
-
South Australian Public Health (Immunisation and Early Childhood Services) Amendment Bill
- South Australian Research and Development Institute
-
South Australian Strategic Plan Audit Committee
- South Australian Time Zone
- South Australian Tourism Commission
-
South Australian Training Awards
-
South East Drainage Network Community Panel
- South East Forestry Partnerships Program
- South East Natural Resources Management Board
- South Eastern Freeway
- South Eastern Water Conservation and Drainage Board
-
South Para Reservoir Public Access
- South Road Tram Overpass
- South Sudanese Community
- South-East Asia Trade Mission
-
South-East Drainage System
- 2015-03-17
-
2015-03-19
- 2015-03-26
- South-East Forest Water Licensing Program
- South-East Roads
- South-East Wastewater Disposal
-
South-East Water Allocation Plan
-
2015-11-17
-
-
Southern Adelaide Local Health Network
-
2017-10-17
-
2017-10-31
-
- Southern Hairy-Nosed Wombat
- Southern Redbacks
-
Southern State Superannuation (Parental Leave) Amendment Bill
- Southern Vales Christian College
- Space Industries
- Space Industry Forum
-
Spark Resource Centre
-
Species Loss
-
2015-07-29
-
- Speech Pathology
-
Speed Safety Cameras
- Speeding Fines
-
Spencer Gulf
- 2015-06-18
-
2016-05-26
-
Answers to Questions (2)
-
-
Spinal Cord Injury Service
- Spirit Festival
- Srebrenica Genocide
- St John Ambulance SA
- Staff Misconduct
-
Stamp Duties (Foreign Ownership Surcharge) Amendment Bill
- 2017-11-16
-
2017-11-28
-
Stamp Duties (Off-The-Plan Apartments) Amendment Bill
- Stamp Duty
- Stanbury, Mr D.
-
Standard Time (Alteration of Standard Time) Amendment Bill
- Standing Orders Committee
-
Standing Orders Suspension
- 2015-02-10
- 2015-06-18
- 2016-11-30
-
2017-02-28
-
Parliamentary Procedure (3)
-
- State Administration Centre
- State Budget
-
State Debt
-
State Early Commercialisation Fund
-
2017-05-18
-
2017-05-30
- 2017-05-31
-
-
State Economy
- 2015-10-28
-
2017-07-04
-
State Energy Plan
- 2017-03-28
-
2017-03-29
-
2017-04-11
- 2017-04-12
- State Export Figures
-
State Government Concessions
- State Government Employment
- State Government Expenditure
-
State Ice Taskforce
- State Library of South Australia
-
State Major Bank Levy
-
2017-07-04
-
Question Time (9)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. K.J. MAHER
-
-
2017-07-05
-
- State of the States Report
-
Statement of Principles for Members of Parliament
- Statewide Gambling Therapy Service
- Statutes Amendment (Animal Welfare Reforms) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Attorney-General's Portfolio No 3) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Attorney-General's Portfolio) (No 2) Bill
- 2017-09-27
- 2017-09-28
- 2017-10-19
-
2017-10-31
-
Statutes Amendment (Attorney-General's Portfolio) Bill
- 2016-05-17
- 2016-05-18
- 2016-05-24
- 2016-05-26
- 2016-06-07
- 2016-06-09
-
2016-06-21
-
Statutes Amendment (Boards and Committees - Abolition and Reform) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Budget 2016) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Bullying) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Child Exploitation and Encrypted Material) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Commonwealth Registered Entities) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Court Fees) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Courts and Justice Measures) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Decriminalisation of Sex Work) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Drink and Drug Driving) Bill
- Statutes Amendment (Drug Driving Penalties) Bill
- Statutes Amendment (Drug Offenders) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Electricity and Gas) Bill
- 2016-06-22
- 2016-06-23
- 2016-09-22
- 2017-03-02
-
2017-06-01
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2017-06-20
-
Statutes Amendment (Explosives) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Extremist Material) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Firearms Offences) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Gambling Measures) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Gaming Area Prohibitions and Barring Orders) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Gaming Prohibitions) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Gender Identity and Equity) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Heavy Vehicles Registration Fees) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Home Detention) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Industrial Relations Consultative Council) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Intensity of Development) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Judicial Registrars) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Leading Practice in Mining) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (National Electricity and Gas Laws - Information Collection and Publication) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (National Policing Information Systems and Services) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Planning, Development and Infrastructure) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Possession of Firearms and Prohibited Weapons) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Public Sector Audit) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Recidivist and Repeat Offenders) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Registered Relationships) Bill
- Statutes Amendment (Rights of Foster Parents and Guardians) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Rights of Foster Parents, Guardians and Kinship Carers) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (SACAT No 2) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (SACAT) Amendment Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Sentencing) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (South Australian Employment Tribunal) Bill
- 2016-09-21
- 2016-09-22
- 2016-11-03
- 2016-11-15
- 2016-11-29
-
2016-11-30
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2016-12-01
- 2017-02-16
-
Statutes Amendment (Superannuation) Bill
- 2015-07-29
-
2015-07-30
- 2015-09-08
-
Statutes Amendment (Surrogacy Eligibility) Bill
- 2016-11-17
- 2016-11-29
- 2016-11-30
- 2016-12-01
- 2016-12-06
-
2016-12-07
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2017-02-15
- 2017-02-28
- 2017-03-28
-
Statutes Amendment (Terror Suspect Detention) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Terrorism) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Transport Online Transactions and Other Matters) Bill
- Statutes Amendment (Transport Portfolio) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Universities) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Vehicle Inspections and South Eastern Freeway Offences) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Vulnerable Witnesses) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Youth Court) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment (Youths Sentenced As Adults) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment and Repeal (Budget 2015) Bill
- 2015-09-10
- 2015-09-23
- 2015-10-13
- 2015-10-27
- 2015-10-28
- 2015-11-17
-
2015-11-19
-
Bills (2)
-
- 2015-12-01
- Statutes Amendment and Repeal (Simplify No 2) Bill
-
Statutes Amendment and Repeal (Simplify) Bill
- 2016-12-01
- 2016-12-06
- 2017-02-28
- 2017-03-01
-
2017-03-02
-
Bills (2)
-
-
2017-03-28
-
Statutory Authorities Review Committee
- 2015-02-11
- 2015-11-18
- 2015-12-01
-
2016-02-09
-
Parliamentary Committees (2)
-
- 2016-02-23
- 2016-05-25
- 2016-07-05
- 2016-11-29
- 2017-02-28
- 2017-03-28
- 2017-08-08
- 2017-10-17
- 2017-11-28
-
Statutory Authorities Review Committee: Annual Report 2013-14
- Statutory Authorities Review Committee: Annual Report 2014-15
-
Statutory Authorities Review Committee: Inquiry into the State Procurement Board of South Australia
- Statutory Authorities Review Committee: Motor Accident Commission
- Statutory Authorities Review Committee: Site Contamination at Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park
- Statutory Authorities Review Committee: TAFE SA
-
Statutory Officers Committee
- Steel Industry
-
Steel Industry Protection Bill
-
STEM Australia Website
-
2015-07-02
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
-
STEM Education
-
STEM Skills
-
Stolen Generations Compensation
- 2015-05-12
-
2015-05-14
-
2015-06-03
- 2015-09-10
- 2015-10-15
- 2015-12-08
-
Stolen Generations Reparations Scheme
-
2015-11-19
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (3)
-
-
2016-06-23
- 2016-10-18
- 2017-03-02
-
2017-09-26
-
Question Time (3)
-
-
-
Stormwater Management
-
2016-09-20
- 2016-09-28
-
2017-02-28
-
- Strategic Employment Fund
-
Strategic Policy Advisory Panel
-
2016-12-01
-
- Street Lighting
- Stretton Centre
- Stretton, Prof. H.
- Students, Disability
-
Sturt Gorge Recreation Park
-
Suicide Prevention
- 2015-02-12
- 2015-03-26
- 2015-05-06
- 2015-06-03
- 2015-07-01
- 2015-07-02
-
2015-07-29
- 2015-09-10
-
2015-10-14
-
Motions (1)
-
Question Time (2)
-
- 2015-11-18
- 2016-02-10
-
2016-05-17
-
Answers to Questions (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
-
2016-10-20
- 2017-02-15
- 2017-05-10
-
2017-11-30
-
Suicide Prevention Strategy
- Suicide Registry
-
Summary Offences (Biometric Identification) Amendment Bill
-
Summary Offences (Declared Public Precincts) Amendment Bill
- Summary Offences (Disrespectful Conduct in Court Proceedings) Amendment Bill
-
Summary Offences (Filming and Sexting Offences) Amendment Bill
-
Summary Offences (Interviewing Vulnerable Witnesses) Amendment Bill
-
Summary Offences (Liquor Offences) Amendment Bill
-
Summary Procedure (Abolition of Complaints) Amendment Bill
-
Summary Procedure (Indictable Offences) Amendment Bill
-
Summary Procedure (Service) Amendment Bill
- Sunday Penalty Rates
-
Sundrop Farms
- Superannuation
- Supplementary Questions
-
Supply Bill 2015
-
Supply Bill 2016
-
Supply Bill 2017
-
Supply Chain Workers
- Surrogacy
-
Surveillance Devices (Animal Welfare) Amendment Bill
-
Surveillance Devices Bill
- Sustainability, Environment and Conservation Minister
-
Swaffer, Ms K.
- Switched on Schools Summit
- Syrian Humanitarian Crisis
-
T
-
TAFE SA
-
2015-02-26
-
2015-03-17
-
2015-03-18
-
Question Time (8)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
-
-
2015-06-02
-
2015-06-16
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2015-06-17
-
2015-09-23
-
2015-10-14
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2015-11-18
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
2015-12-02
-
2015-12-10
- 2016-02-11
-
2016-05-26
-
- TAFE SA Audit
-
TAFE SA Leases
-
TAFE SA Shearing and Wool Program
-
2015-09-24
- 2015-12-03
-
-
TAFE SA, Director Appointment
- Tallent, Mr Jared
- Targeted Voluntary Separation Packages
-
Tarnanthi Festival of Contemporary Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Art
-
2015-10-14
-
- Tassone
-
Tassone, Mr B.
-
2017-02-28
-
Question Time (7)
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
-
-
2017-03-01
- 2017-03-02
-
-
Tattoo Industry
-
Tattooing Industry Control Bill
- Tauondi Aboriginal College
- Taxation Reform
- Taxes and Charges
-
Taxi and Chauffeur Vehicle Industry Review
-
Taxi Industry
-
Taxi Industry Assistance Package
-
2017-05-31
-
- Taylor, Mr C.
- Teacher Education
- Teachers Registration Board
-
Techport Australia
- Teen Body Image
-
Tennyson Dunes
-
2015-02-12
-
2016-05-25
- 2016-09-21
-
2017-04-12
-
- Terrorism Screening
- Thao Nguyen
- The Boomgate
- The Cedars
- The Internet of Things Innovation Hub
-
The Jam, the Mix, the Gig
-
The National Indigenous Times
-
The Uniting Church in Australia (Membership of Trust) Amendment Bill
- Thoroughbred Racing Industry Awards
- Threatened Species
-
Ticket Scalping
-
Time Zones
-
2015-07-02
- 2015-09-10
- 2015-10-27
-
-
Tobacco Products Regulation (Artistic Performances) Amendment Bill
-
Tobacco Products Regulation (E-Cigarette Regulation) Amendment Bill
-
Tod Reservoir
-
2016-04-12
-
- Tonsley Entrepreneurs
-
Tonsley Innovation District
-
2017-11-14
-
-
Tonsley Park Redevelopment
- Torrens Island Quarantine Station
- Torrens Title System
- Tour Down Under
-
Tourism
- Toxic Waste
- Trade Support Loans
- Trade Unions
- Trade Waste Initiative
- Training Agreements
-
Trans-Pacific Partnership
-
Transforming Health
- 2015-02-10
- 2015-02-11
- 2015-03-17
- 2015-06-03
- 2015-09-23
-
2015-10-14
- 2016-11-17
- 2017-04-12
-
2017-09-27
-
2017-10-18
-
Question Time (7)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
- The Hon. S.G. WADE, The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS
-
-
2017-11-01
-
2017-11-16
-
Transit Police
-
Transport Subsidy Scheme
- Transport Transaction Levy
- Trauma Counselling Services
-
Treaty Commissioner
-
2017-02-28
-
2017-03-01
-
-
Treaty Negotiations
-
2017-03-28
- 2017-03-29
-
2017-04-12
- 2017-06-01
-
2017-11-14
-
- Trichloroethylene Exposure
- Trinity South Coast
-
Tunkalilla Beach
-
2015-03-19
-
- Turnbull, Hon. M.B.
- Two Wells Melodrama Group
- Twu Safe Rates Campaign
- Tyndale Christian School
- Tzu Chi Foundation
-
-
U
- Uluru Statement
- Umbrella: Winter City Sounds
-
Unanswered Questions
-
Underground Coal Gasification
- Understanding Opportunities for Small Business
- Unemployed Migrants
-
Unemployment Figures
- 2015-02-25
-
2015-03-19
- 2015-06-16
-
2015-06-17
-
2015-09-10
- 2016-03-22
- 2016-04-14
-
2016-10-20
-
Question Time (2)
-
- 2017-03-28
-
2017-05-18
- 2017-06-01
- 2017-07-05
-
United Nations Anniversary
- United Nations Association of Australia Peace Bottle Launch
- United Nations Human Rights Council
- Universal Design
- University Enrolment, Males
- University of Adelaide
-
University of South Australia
- University Withdrawal Rates
-
Unley Water Contamination
- Unlicensed Car Dealers
-
Unlocking Capital for Jobs
-
2017-04-11
- 2017-05-16
-
- Uyghur Community
-
V
-
Valedictories
- Valedictory
-
Valuation of Land (Separate Valuations) Amendment Bill
- Valuation Program
- Valuer-General
- Venezuela
-
Venture Capital Fund
- Venture Catalyst Awards
-
Venture Catalyst Program
-
2016-06-08
-
- Venture Dorm Graduation
-
Veterans' Advisory Council
- Veterans' Graves
- Veterans' Mental Health Precinct
-
Victims of Crime (Compensation) Amendment Bill
-
Victims of Crime (Victims Rights) Amendment Bill
-
Victims of Crime Fund
-
Victor Harbor Coast Water Quality
-
2017-08-08
-
- Video Game Industry
- Vietnam Environmental Disaster
- Vietnamese Veterans Association
- Vinnies CEO Sleepout
-
Virginia Irrigation Association
-
2017-06-22
- 2017-07-06
-
- Visitor Visas
-
Visitors
- 2015-02-12
- 2015-02-25
- 2015-03-18
-
2015-03-19
- 2015-03-24
- 2015-03-26
- 2015-06-03
- 2015-07-30
- 2015-09-08
- 2015-09-23
-
2015-09-24
-
2015-10-14
- 2015-10-15
- 2015-10-28
- 2015-11-18
- 2015-11-19
- 2015-12-01
- 2015-12-02
- 2015-12-08
- 2016-02-11
- 2016-03-10
-
2016-03-23
- 2016-04-12
-
2016-04-14
-
2016-05-25
-
2016-06-23
-
2016-08-04
- 2016-09-20
- 2016-09-21
-
2016-09-27
- 2016-09-29
- 2016-11-01
- 2016-11-02
- 2016-11-03
- 2016-11-30
- 2016-12-06
- 2017-03-01
- 2017-03-29
- 2017-03-30
- 2017-05-16
- 2017-05-18
- 2017-05-30
- 2017-06-01
- 2017-06-22
- 2017-07-05
-
2017-07-06
-
2017-08-09
-
2017-08-10
- 2017-09-27
- 2017-10-19
-
2017-11-01
-
2017-11-15
- 2017-11-28
-
2017-11-29
-
Vocational Education and Training
- 2015-02-11
-
2015-02-12
-
2015-03-17
- 2015-03-19
- 2015-05-06
-
2015-06-02
-
2015-06-03
-
2015-06-04
-
Question Time (9)
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. T.A. FRANKS, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. K.L. VINCENT, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. J.A. DARLEY, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
- The Hon. R.I. LUCAS, The Hon. G.E. GAGO
-
-
2015-06-16
-
2015-06-17
-
2015-07-29
-
Answers to Questions (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2015-09-08
- 2015-09-22
- 2015-10-27
- 2015-12-02
-
2015-12-03
- 2015-12-09
- Volunteer Firefighters Memorial
- VTT Cellulose Fibre Chain Value Study
- Vulnerable Witness Interviews
-
-
W
- Walk for a Veteran March
- Walk the Yorke Trail
- Walk Together
-
Waste and Resource Recovery Sector
-
Waste Management
-
Waste Recycling
- Waste SA Conference
-
Wastewater Allocations
-
2016-10-18
-
Question Time (8)
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. J.A. DARLEY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
- The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY, The Hon. I.K. HUNTER
-
- 2016-10-19
- 2016-11-02
- 2016-11-29
-
-
Wastewater Discharge
-
2017-05-09
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
-
Watarru Community
-
2016-08-04
- 2017-02-15
-
- Watchalunga Nature Reserve
-
Water Allocation
- 2016-02-11
-
2016-04-13
- 2016-06-22
-
2016-12-01
-
Water Allocation Plans
-
2015-10-15
-
2015-12-01
- 2016-04-12
- 2016-06-22
-
-
Water and Sewerage Charges
- Water and Sewerage Infrastructure
- Water Billing
- Water Diversion Allocations
- Water for Good
-
Water Industry (Compensation for Loss Or Damage) Amendment Bill
-
Water Industry (Third Party Access) Amendment Bill
- Water Industry Act, Reporting Obligations
- Water Industry Alliance Smart Water Awards
-
Water Levies
-
2015-09-09
- 2015-09-24
- 2015-10-29
-
2015-11-17
- 2015-11-19
-
-
Water Licences
- Water Management
-
Water Meters
- 2015-03-25
-
2015-10-13
-
2016-02-24
- 2016-04-14
- 2016-05-17
- Water Portfolio Reforms
-
Water Pricing
-
2015-05-06
-
2015-05-12
-
2015-05-14
- 2015-09-09
- 2015-09-24
-
2016-02-10
-
Ministerial Statement (2)
-
-
2016-02-24
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
-
Water Quality
-
2016-12-06
- 2017-02-14
-
-
Water Resources Management
-
Water Security
-
2017-10-31
-
-
Water Transportation Scheme
- Waterloo Bay Massacre
-
Waterproofing Eastern Adelaide Project
- Wear Orange Wednesday
-
Webster, Mr S.
-
Weed Control
- Welcome to Australia
-
West Coast Aboriginal Communities
-
2016-06-09
-
-
Western Mount Lofty Ranges Water Allocation Plan
-
2015-09-22
-
Personal Explanation (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
-
- Whale Migration
-
Whale Removal
- Whale Sanctuaries
-
White Ribbon Campaign
-
2016-11-29
-
-
White Ribbon Day
- Whooping Cough Vaccination
- Whyalla Property Values
- Whyalla Social Housing
-
Whyalla Steel Works (Environmental Authorisation) Amendment Bill
-
Whyalla Steelworks
- Whyte, Hon. A.M.
- Wild Dog Management
-
Wild Dog Strategic Plan
-
Wildlife Ethics Committee
-
2016-11-15
-
-
Wind Farm Developments
- Wind Farms
-
Winnovation Awards
-
Winston Churchill Memorial Trust
- Winter Festivals
- WOMADelaide
- Women Hold Up Half the Sky Awards
- Women in Agriculture and Business
- Women in Innovation Awards
-
Women in Parliament
- Women in Policing
-
Women in Sport
-
2015-12-09
-
Question Time (2)
-
-
-
Women in Technology
-
2015-12-08
-
- Women in the Music Industry
-
Women in the Workforce
-
2015-10-15
-
- Women on Boards and Committees
-
Women's Legal Service
- Women's March
-
Women's Sport
-
Women's Sporting Events
-
Women's Suffrage Anniversary
- 2017-05-30
- 2017-05-31
-
2017-07-06
-
Women's Unemployment
-
2015-06-18
-
-
Woodland Birds
-
2017-11-01
-
- Woodsons Lane
-
Work Health and Safety (Industrial Manslaughter) Amendment Bill
-
Work Health and Safety (Prosecutions Under Repealed Act) Amendment Bill
-
Work Health and Safety (Representative Assistance) Amendment Bill
- Work Health and Safety Management Plan
-
Work Related Mental Disorders and Suicide Prevention Inquiry
-
2017-08-10
-
- WorkCover
-
Workers Compensation
-
WorkReady
-
2015-06-02
-
2015-06-04
-
2015-06-30
-
2015-07-01
- 2015-07-02
-
2015-07-30
-
2015-09-08
- 2015-09-22
-
2015-09-23
- 2015-10-27
- 2015-12-09
- 2016-05-26
-
-
World AIDS Day
-
World Environment Day
- World Environment Day Awards
- World Social Work Day
- World Toilet Day
- World Wetlands Day
-
Worrall, Mr L.
-
2015-03-24
-
Answers to Questions (1)
-
Question Time (1)
-
- 2015-05-06
- 2016-05-18
-
- Worrall, Mr. L.
-
Wyndgate Farm
- 2017-03-29
-
2017-08-10
-
Y
- Yalumba Winery Solar Panel Installation
- Yamba Quarantine Station
- Yatala Labour Prison
-
Yatala Labour Prison Incident
-
2016-09-27
-
Ministerial Statement (1)
-
Question Time (6)
-
-
2016-09-28
-
Matters of Interest (1)
-
Question Time (5)
-
-
2016-11-02
-
-
Yatco Lagoon
-
2015-03-25
- 2015-07-29
-
-
Yeend, Mr S.
- Yellow Ribbon Project
-
Yorke Peninsula Country Times
- Yorke Peninsula Environment Policy
- Young Offenders Bill
- Young, Ms Stella
- Youth Jobs Path
-
Youth Justice Administration Bill
- 2015-11-19
- 2015-12-02
- 2016-02-10
- 2016-03-10
-
2016-03-22
-
Youth Mental Health
- Youth Survey 2016
-
Z
Statutes Amendment (Recidivist and Repeat Offenders) Bill
Second Reading
The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (16:21): I move:
That this bill be now read a second time.
I seek leave to have the second reading speech and explanation of clauses inserted in Hansard without my reading it.
Leave granted.
In the criminal justice system in South Australia there are two existing regimes that provide for the extended supervision and the continued detention of offenders beyond their existing sentence. This Bill extends these regimes to enhance community safety.
The Bill also expands the category of offenders for whom there is a presumption against release on bail.
The Statutes Amendment (Recidivist and Repeat Offenders) Bill 2017 builds upon existing provisions in the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988 (the Sentencing Act) concerning both youth and adult repeat offenders.
By force of section 20B(a1) of the Sentencing Act, a person will be taken to be a serious repeat offender (SRO) if they have been convicted of committing, on at least three separate occasions, any of a number of specified serious offences. Section 20B(1) then continues to provide that a person is liable to be declared a SRO if they have been convicted of committing any of a number of other serious offences on at least two or three separate occasions, depending on the offence type.
Once a person is either taken to be, or declared to be, a SRO, the sentencing court is not bound to ensure that the sentence it imposes for the offence is proportional to the offence and any non-parole period fixed in relation to the sentence must be at least four-fifths the length of the sentence.
However, the sentencing court retains a discretion to declare that these provisions do not apply if the offender satisfies the court, by evidence given on oath, that his or her personal circumstances are so exceptional as to outweigh the primary policy of the criminal law of emphasising public safety and it is, in all the circumstances, not appropriate that he or she be sentenced as a serious repeat offender.
Under section 20C of the Sentencing Act, a youth is liable to be declared a recidivist young offender (RYO) if the youth has been convicted of committing, on at least two or three separate occasions (depending on the offence type) any of a number of specified serious offences.
If a youth is declared a RYO, then the sentencing court is not bound to ensure that the sentence it imposes for the offence is proportional to the offence (but, in the case of the Youth Court, the limitations relating to a sentence of detention under section 23 of the Young Offenders Act 1993 apply to the sentence that may be imposed by the Youth Court on the RYO). In addition, any non-parole period fixed in relation to the sentence must be at least four-fifths the length of the sentence.
Under the Bill, new consequences will flow from being a SRO or a RYO under the Sentencing Act, the Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Act 2015 (the HRO Act) and the Bail Act 1985 (SA) (the Bail Act).
Part 2 Division 3 (including section 23, 23A and 24) of the Sentencing Act establishes a regime whereby adults (and youths sentenced as adults) who are convicted of, and/or sentenced for, specific serious sexual offences (we will refer to these offenders as serious repeat sexual offenders) can be the subject of an order to be detained indefinitely, on the basis that they are incapable of controlling, or unwilling to control, his or her sexual instincts. This is referred to as a detention order.
The same regime also provides for a consequent release on licence (with conditions) and for applications to be made for the detention order to be discharged.
Section 23 of the Sentencing Act provides that:
at the time of sentencing the prosecution can apply to the Supreme Court for a detention order against the serious repeat sexual offender;
the Attorney-General may also apply to the Supreme Court for a detention order against a serious repeat sexual offender, whilst they remain in prison;
the paramount consideration of the Supreme Court in determining whether to make an order that the serious repeat sexual offender be detained in custody until further order must be the safety of the community; and
before making the order, the Supreme Court must direct that at least two legally qualified medical practitioners inquire into the mental condition of the serious repeat sexual offender and report to the Court on whether they are incapable of controlling, or unwilling to control, his or her sexual instincts.
Under the Bill, section 23 is expanded to apply to RYOs and SROs (referred to in the Bill as prescribed offenders).
The Bill provides that, before making any order under section 23 concerning a SRO or a RYO, the Supreme Court must direct that at least two legally qualified medical practitioners inquire into the mental condition of the RYO or SRO and report to the Court on whether they are incapable of controlling, or unwilling to control, their sexual instincts or violent impulses.
In addition, section 23 does not currently allow the Supreme Court to make interim orders, so the Bill creates a scheme whereby an interim order can be made detaining the offenders who are the subject of an application under section 23. The Bill also precludes the release of the offender (for example, the release of an adult offender on parole) whilst the section 23 application is being determined.
In all cases, the paramount consideration for the Supreme Court in making an order for an offenders continued detention is, and will continue to be, the safety of the community.
Once an offender is the subject of a detention order made under section 23, sections 23A and 24 of the Sentencing Act allow for a conditional release on licence and also for the detention order to be discharged. The Bill amends these provisions to also apply to RYOs and SROs who are made the subject of a detention order.
The Bill also amends the HRO Act.
The HRO Act provides a regime whereby an application can be made for the extended supervision of high risk offenders (both violent and sexual offenders) beyond the completion of their sentence, and their continued detention if an order is breached.
Under the HRO Act an application can be made to the Supreme Court by the Attorney-General, in the last 12 months of the offenders sentence (whether that is being served in custody or on parole) for an extended supervision order (ESO) which has conditions attached.
Under the HRO Act, before determining whether to make an ESO, the Supreme Court must direct that one or more legally qualified medical practitioners examine the offender and report to the Court on the results of the examination.
For a high risk serious sexual offender the medical practitioner undertakes, and reports on, an assessment of the likelihood of the respondent committing a further serious sexual offence.
For a high risk serious violent offender the medical practitioner undertakes, and reports on, an assessment of the likelihood of the respondent committing a further serious offence of violence.
Under the HRO Act, the Supreme Court can order that the offender be the subject of an ESO if satisfied that:
the respondent is a high risk offender; and
the respondent poses an appreciable risk to the safety of the community if not supervised under the order.
Again, the paramount consideration of the Supreme Court in determining whether to make an ESO must be the safety of the community.
If the offender breaches the conditions of their ESO, the matter is either dealt with by the Parole Board amending their conditions, or the Parole Board can elect to have the person appear before the Supreme Court and an application can be made for a continued detention order (CDO). The Attorney-General then becomes a party to the proceedings.
At the moment the HRO Act does not apply to youths and only applies to a certain category of high risk offender.
Under the Bill it is proposed that the HRO Act be extended to apply to SROs and RYOs, such that SROs and RYOs automatically fall under the definition of high risk offender.
This would allow the Attorney-General, during the last 12 months of the sentence of a RYO or a SRO, to lodge an application for an ESO.
Under the Bill, the Supreme Court must then direct that one or more legally qualified medical practitioners examine the RYO or SRO, and report to the Court on the results of the examination.
For both a RYO and SRO, under the Bill, the medical practitioner undertakes, and reports on, an assessment of the likelihood of the respondent committing a further offence of any kind that resulted in them becoming a SRO or RYO (as the case may be)
This ensures the medical report consider the types of offences that resulted in the offender being either declared a RYO or deemed or declared a SRO in the first place.
Under the Bill, the Supreme Court can order that the RYO or SRO be the subject of an ESO if satisfied that they pose an appreciable risk to the safety of the community if not supervised under the order.
Once a RYO or a SRO is the subject of an ESO, under the existing provisions of the HRO Act if the RYO or SRO breaches the conditions of their ESO, the matter is either dealt with:
in the case of adult, by the Parole Board amending their conditions or electing to have the person appear before the Supreme Court with an application being made for a CDO; or
in the case of a youth, by the Training Centre Review Board amending their conditions, or electing to have the person appear before the Supreme Court with an application being made for a CDO.
The Attorney-General then becomes a party to these proceedings.
Again, in all cases, the paramount consideration of the Supreme Court in determining whether to make an ESO will remain as the safety of the community.
The Bill also proposes an amendment to section 10AA of the Bail Act to introduce a presumption against bail for any RYO or SRO.
Lastly, the Bill amends the Sentencing Act 2017 (SA), which has not yet commenced. These amendments mirror the amendments to the Sentencing Act and ensure the new regime contained in the Bill that applies to RYOs and SROs will continue when the Sentencing Act 2017 (SA) commences.
I commend the Bill to Members.
Explanation of Clauses
Part 1—Preliminary
1—Short title
2—Commencement
3—Amendment provisions
These clauses are formal.
Part 2—Amendment of Bail Act 1985
4—Amendment of section 10A—Presumption against bail in certain cases
This clause amends the Bail Act to provide a presumption against bail for recidivist young offenders and serious repeat offenders.
Part 3—Amendment of Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Act 2015
5—Amendment of section 3—Object of Act
This clause makes a consequential amendment to the objects provision.
6—Amendment of section 4—Interpretation
This clause inserts definitions for the purposes of the measure.
7—Amendment of section 5—Meaning of high risk offender
This clause includes serious repeat offenders who are serving a sentence of imprisonment and recidivist young offenders who are serving a sentence of detention in the definition of 'high risk offenders' for the purposes of applying the Act to them.
8—Amendment of section 6—Application of Act
This clause ensures that the Act applies in relation to a youth who is a recidivist young offender.
9—Insertion of section 6A
This clause prescribes modifications of the Act for the purposes of applying it to youths who are recidivist young offenders and allows the regulations to prescribe further modifications if necessary.
10—Amendment of section 7—Proceedings
This clause makes consequential changes to the requirements relating to proceedings.
11—Transitional provision
This is a transitional provision.
Part 4—Amendment of Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988
12—Amendment of section 21—Application
This clause ensures that the Division can be applied to a recidivist young offender.
13—Amendment of section 23—Orders to protect safety of community
This clause amends the current section allowing orders for ongoing detention of offenders who are incapable of controlling, or are unwilling to control, sexual instincts by extending that section to recidivist young offenders and serious repeat offenders who are incapable of controlling, or are unwilling to control, sexual instincts or violent impulses.
14—Amendment of section 23A—Discharge of detention order under section 23
This clause makes consequential amendments.
15—Amendment of section 24—Release on licence
This clause makes consequential amendments.
16—Amendment of section 25A—Inquiries by medical practitioners
This clause makes consequential amendments.
17—Amendment of section 29—Regulations
This clause makes consequential amendments.
18—Transitional provision
The amendments will apply after commencement regardless of when the relevant offence or the offence that resulted in the person becoming a serious repeat offender or a recidivist young offender was committed or when the person was sentenced for that offence.
Part 5—Amendment of Sentencing Act 2017
19—Amendment of section 56—Application of this Division
This clause ensures that the Division can be applied to a recidivist young offender.
20—Amendment of section 57—Orders to protect safety of community
This clause amends the current section allowing orders for ongoing detention of offenders who are incapable of controlling, or are unwilling to control, sexual instincts by extending that section to recidivist young offenders and serious repeat offenders who are incapable of controlling, or are unwilling to control, sexual instincts or violent impulses.
21—Amendment of section 58—Discharge of detention order under section 57
This clause makes consequential amendments.
22—Amendment of section 59—Release on licence
This clause makes consequential amendments.
23—Amendment of section 62—Inquiries by medical practitioners
This clause makes consequential amendments.
24—Amendment of section 67—Regulations
This clause makes consequential amendments.
25—Transitional provision
The amendments will apply after commencement regardless of when the relevant offence or the offence that resulted in the person becoming a serious repeat offender or a recidivist young offender was committed or when the person was sentenced for that offence.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN (16:22): I rise to speak to the Statutes Amendment (Recidivist and Repeat Offenders) Bill. This bill has been called on urgently and passed through the House of Assembly with little or no debate. The Liberal Party agreed to progress the bill urgently and review it between the chambers. As you are aware, Mr President, it has been called on urgently, and we are advised by the government that they wish the bill to progress through all stages this afternoon. These are exceptional circumstances, and I will outline some of the difficulties the Liberal Party has with this bill. In the committee stage we will be seeking to put certain amendments to the chamber for its approval.
The Liberal Party supports the second reading of the bill. The bill seeks to amend the Bail Act 1985, the Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Act 2015, the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988, and the Sentencing Act 2017. I should add that I am making the assumption, when making my second reading contribution, that the second reading speech the government has tabled is identical to the one incorporated without reading—indeed, that has just been delivered.
The Sentencing Act currently enables indefinite detention of certain serious repeat sexual offenders, adults and youths sentenced as adults. The Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Act currently enables the extended supervision of high-risk offenders, sexual or violent, beyond the completion of their sentence. It is these two acts which we are seeking to amend. Honourable members might note that there is a reference to two sentencing bills—the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988 and the Sentencing Act 2017, which we recently passed but is not yet law. So, this bill seeks to amend not only the existing law but also the law that is yet to come into force. I might touch on that a little later.
The bill seeks to expand the regimes for continued supervision and detention orders to apply to serious repeat offenders and recidivist youth offenders. It also seeks to expand the category of offenders for whom there is a presumption against bail to include serious repeat offenders and recidivist youth offenders. It also adds provisions enabling a court to make interim orders for detention whilst applications for continued detention are under consideration.
I might touch upon the current powers to assist the members of the chamber. Under the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988, a person is taken to be or liable to be declared a serious repeat offender if they are convicted on at least two or three occasions, depending on the offence, of specified serious offences. Once taken to be or declared as a serious repeat offender, the court is not bound to ensure the sentence imposed is proportional to the offending conduct, or any non-parole period must be at least four-fifths the length of the sentence. However, the court has discretion to dispense with these requirements if it is satisfied by the evidence given on oath that the defendant's personal circumstances are so exceptional that it is not appropriate to sentence them as a serious repeat offender.
Section 20C relates to recidivist young offenders and is similar to the above. A youth is liable to be declared a recidivist young offender if they are convicted on at least two or three occasions, depending on the offence, of specified serious offences. Again, the court is not bound to ensure that the sentence imposed for the offence is proportional to the offence, although in the Youth Court the limitations on ordering a sentence of detention under section 23 of the Young Offenders Act apply and any non-parole period must be at least four-fifths the length of the sentence.
In relation to serious repeat sexual offenders—that is, adults and youths sentenced as adults—convicted and sentenced for specific sexual offences, they can be made subject to detention orders. An order can be made that a serious repeat sexual offender be detained indefinitely on the basis that they are incapable or unwilling to control their sexual instincts. The same regime also provides for consequent release on licence with conditions. Applications can also be made for the detention order to be discharged.
The current process for making detention orders is that at the time of sentencing the prosecution can apply to the Supreme Court for a detention order against a serious repeat sexual offender. The Attorney-General also has power to apply to the Supreme Court whilst the individual remains in prison. The paramount consideration for the court is community safety. Before an order is made, two medically qualified practitioners must report to the court on whether the offender is incapable of controlling or unwilling to control their sexual instincts.
The bill proposes to expand the detention order provisions to also apply to recidivist youth offenders and serious repeat offenders. It also provides for interim provisions that allow a court to make interim orders. The bill proposes to enable a court to make detention orders for offenders who are the subject of an application and precludes their release, for example on parole, whilst the application is being determined.
Under the existing Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Act, a court can order extended supervision orders of high-risk offenders beyond the completion of their sentence. Continued detention can also be ordered if an order is breached. This act only applies to high-risk sexual offenders and not youths. So, the current process is that, during the last 12 months of a sentence, the Attorney-General can make an application to the Supreme Court. One or more legally qualified medical practitioners examine the offender and report to the court.
For sexual offenders, they report on the likelihood of the offender committing a further sexual offence and, likewise, a violent offender committing a further offence of violence. The court makes an order if they pose an appreciable risk to the safety of the community if they are left unsupervised. If an offender breaches an order, the Parole Board can then elect to have the person appear before the Supreme Court and apply for a continued detention order.
In that context, the bill seeks to have serious repeat offenders and recidivist youth offenders fall under the definition of a high-risk offender. This would then allow the Attorney-General to apply for a supervision order in the last 12 months of their sentence. The same procedural and evidentiary rules are proposed to apply in relation to the court making such an order, except that the assessment is on the likelihood of the respondent committing a further offence of any kind that resulted in their becoming a serious repeat offender or a recidivist youth offender. Breaches of an order will be dealt with in the same manner, except for youths, who will be dealt with by the Youth Parole Board. I think that is government amendment No. 4.
The bill before us also seeks to make changes to bail provisions. The bill also proposes an amendment to the Bail Act that extends the presumption against bail for a serious repeat offender or a recidivist youth offender. Mirrored amendments are also proposed for the Sentencing Act 2017, which, as I have mentioned, is not yet in operation.
I think it is important for the benefit of the committee stage, which I am imagining is going to come at the conclusion of the second reading, for us to understand the nature of this bill. During my submission, I will be reading into Hansard some submissions by interested parties, which may go over again the operation of the bill.
We have a situation with a bill that is—after we have just debated the Sentencing Act, which came after consultation and a variety of reports for the benefit of the government—seeking to broaden the class of individuals who become high-risk offenders, in particular for youths, and also those who are serious repeat offenders. In essence, the application of that act and for the provisions in relation to serious sexual offences in relation to detention—we are talking about the concepts of detention and supervision—the class is being considerably expanded.
I touched upon, at the beginning of my second reading contribution, that this is urgent. It is, in my view, a complete undermining of the democratic processes in this state to bring a bill involving complicated and serious amendments to the Sentencing Act, which will have far-reaching implications, before this chamber and say that it has to be debated in an afternoon.
Effectively, the government's line is that there is the case of a youth. I will not go into the details of the case because we have not been provided with all the details of the case, and that is rightly so because they are confidential. I do not intend, during the course of my second reading contribution, or during committee, to abuse privilege and speak in any form of depth in relation to this particular case. We are told that the justification for the immediate passage of this bill today, through all of the stages, is that there is one individual, a youth, who they wish to apply the provisions to.
Honourable members need to take into consideration, when deciding their position on this bill, that we have a case, we do not have the details of this case, and we are being asked to take on good faith from the government that these bill provisions need to be made law. At the same time, there are considerably important provisions in here that relate to adults.
This is not a tailored bill for this one particular instance. It is a significant and, some in the community might say, radical step in changing the nature of sentencing. Traditionally, if you are sentenced, if you do your time, you then can go back into the community, potentially on parole, which is a sort of interim period where you have good conduct. In the past, the parliament has wrestled with detention orders for those convicted of serious sexual offences who are unable to change their ways.
The parliament decided in those circumstances that they were sufficiently exceptional, when the individual could not control their sexual feelings, that detention orders may well be appropriate after an application to the Supreme Court. Again, under high-risk offenders, which involves sexual and violent offending, similarly an application to the Supreme Court may be appropriate. But this is pushing it further, this is changing the dynamic. As a consequence, there should be proper community debate before we legislate. There needs to be significant consultation with key stakeholders in the community so that we can make an informed decision.
I have to say, I am deeply suspicious that this is an attempt to ram through a bill without proper community consultation, examination by the Law Society and members being properly informed with a case involving one individual. I am deeply suspicious. Despite that, the Liberal Party has decided that it will support the second reading and put forward amendments that it thinks are reasonable in the circumstances. I will touch on those later in my speech.
It is an unacceptable position to be in where we have to pass this bill today so that it can go to Executive Council during the week to apparently allow an application to be made soon after. It is almost farcical. It begs the great question, 'How did we get ourselves into this position?' but because it relates to a youth and because it probably relates to elements of government accountability in relation to its care of this child, then we are unable to debate the same.
We are muted out of respect for the individual, which I accept, but it is still not satisfactory and the government is refusing to hold itself to account by putting us in this position—no apology, no acceptance, but rather a second reading debate after the second reading explanation of the government has been tabled and no proper parliamentary processes in the ordinary course of placing this bill. I protest it, but again I say the Liberal Party is acting reasonably in seeking to amend the bill rather than simply opposing it.
What I am confident of is that there is a conga line of incompetence that brings us to this point. It dismays me that the minister responsible in the other place, the member for Port Adelaide, is not taking responsibility and at least setting out that the government holds itself to account for the position we find. No, there is silence. As I said, I suspect that the level of care we have provided this unfortunate youth may well have been a contributor. I do not know, but I suspect.
I point out to members again that we have just gone through the Sentencing Act 2017 and we are amending it substantially. Why were these provisions not incorporated as part of the government's policy initiative? I know why: because no-one recommended it to the government. This is a power grab using the excuse of an unfortunate youth.
There are stakeholder groups who, given the time pressures, have struggled and valiantly put forward some submissions in relation to this bill. Because we are dealing with it urgently, I intend to read them into Hansard. The first one is from Ms Penny Wright, the Guardian for Children and Young People. I have received two submissions from Ms Wright, and I intend to read both. The one I received this afternoon at 1.48pm is by email and is as follows—excuse me, I will not include the salutations:
I am writing to you as Guardian for Children and Young People and as the Training Centre Visitor in relation to the Statutes Amendment (Recidivist and Repeat Offenders) Bill 2017, which is due for debate in the Legislative Council today. I have previously sent you my comments on the bill, but I attach here a further document prepared by my office, which discusses crucial framing principles for the secure therapeutic care. It sets out the minimum requirements that should be present in a situation where secure accommodation is being contemplated on the basis of condition, propensity, instinct in a young person that requires management. I hope this may contribute to thoughtful consideration of the implications and limitations of the proposed legislation.
I understand that one of the rationales for the hasty introduction of this bill is that it is necessary to make arrangements for the continued management of a young person (currently detained in the Adelaide Youth Training Centre but due for imminent release), on the basis that his likely future behaviour poses serious risk to himself and/or the community.
I have now visited this young person. I have also acquainted myself with his history—both before he came to the attention of the state and what has happened to him subsequently. It seems indisputable that his history of family trauma and the experience he has subsequently endured have contributed to his current 'condition'.
I was not consulted about the Bill, nor were any of the other stakeholders who would ordinarily be considered to have expertise and interest in protecting human rights or civil liberties in South Australia.
The Bill observes none of the principles that I have identified in the attached document, and few of the human rights protections that are warranted in the case of detaining someone indefinitely.
In particular, the Bill provides no guarantee or provision that the young person in question (or others who may possibly end up in the same situation) will receive any therapeutic intervention at all. As is clear from my comments, I have significant and serious concerns about this proposed legislation.
Then there is just a salutation and 'please don't hesitate to contact me' paragraph, which I will not read into Hansard.
The document to which Ms Wright (or the Guardian) refers to is a government document from the Office of the Guardian for Children and Young People, dated 16 October 2017 and titled, 'Secure therapeutic care framing principles'. I know other members have received that. As it is a government document, I am working on the assumption that it is familiar to the minister and his advisers.
That is a damning piece of correspondence in relation to the government's handling of the situation—damning. Ms Wright also sent a more formal piece of correspondence, which I understand other honourable members have received. I also intend to read that into Hansard. It is accompanied by a series of tables, which I will seek leave to table. The correspondence is dated 15 October 2017 and is from the Office of the Guardian. It states:
The Statutes Amendment (Recidivist and Repeat Offenders) Bill 2017 was introduced into the parliament on 28 September and debated and passed in the lower house several days later. Please find set out below my initial response to the bill—
That is the matrix. It continues:
These comments are necessarily brief, due to the timetable in which they have been prepared. They take the form of observations and questions about the bill, having particular regard to the implications for children and young people.
As I have not seen this proposed legislation before it was introduced, I am able to respond solely to material available on the parliamentary website, the bill itself and the accompanying Statutes Amendment (Recidivist and Repeat Offenders) Bill 2017 report. In making these comments I am fulfilling the statutory obligations entrusted to me in my dual roles as Guardian for Children and Young People and Training Centre Visitor.
A disproportionate number of young people who come to the attention of the youth justice system, and particularly those who are detained in the youth training centre, are under the guardianship of the minister (approximately one quarter), which far exceeds the proportion who are in alternative care, and of those an average of two thirds have experience of being in residential care.
As the Guardian for Children and Young People, my statutory functions include promoting the best interests of children under guardianship or in the custody of the Minister for Education and Child Development, and in particular those in alternative care pursuant to paragraph 52C(1)(a) of the Children's Protection Act 1993, as amended by the Children and Young People (Oversight and Advocacy Bodies) Act 2016, which is yet to be commenced.
In carrying out those functions, the enabling legislation also requires the guardian to pay particular attention to the needs of such children who have a physical, psychological or intellectual disability, pursuant to paragraph 52C(2)(b) of the same act. Such children and young people are likely to be particularly and severely impacted by this current bill.
As a Training Centre Visitor my statutory functions include promoting the best interests of the residents of a training centre and to act as an advocate for the residents of a training centre to promote the proper resolution of issues relating to the care, treatment or control of such residents pursuant to sections 14(1)(c) and (d) respectively of the Youth Justice Administration Act 2016. My introductory discussion offers a broad perspective about the bill followed by more focused comments in the three accompanying tables.
Honourable members will note that I will be seeking to table those three tables, or matrices. It goes on under the heading, ‘Broad perspective’:
It is not possible in the time available to explore all the potential impacts of the bill in the lives and enjoyment of the rights of children and young people. Under the bill, serious new consequences will flow from a young person being designated as a serious repeat offender (SRO) or a recidivist young offender (RYO) under the Criminal Law Sentencing Act 1988, the Sentencing Act 2017, the Criminal Law High Risk Offenders Act 2015 and/or the Bail Act 1985 (the Bail Act).
The potential impact of the bill invites the simple question: does South Australia need a new statutory basis for depriving children and young people of their liberty? The effect of the bill will be that the Supreme Court will be empowered to impose a new type of order on children and young people if certain conditions are met. A simple and blunter trigger is required, that a child or a young person meets the criteria of a repeat serious offender or recidivist. This alone increases the likelihood that children and young people from some backgrounds will have orders imposed, notably those from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, and those who deal with the effects of mental health issues and certain disabilities.
The bill also envisages the extension of the problematic designation ‘high risk offender’ to children and young people, thereby requiring the Supreme Court to test whether they pose an appreciable risk to the safety of the community if not supervised under an order. Arguments raised in my recent response to the government’s Statutes Amendment (Youths Sentenced as Adults) Bill 2017 could be revisited here, in particular the need to balance any invocation of community safety with the balance in recognition of the rights guarantee in relevant articles of the Convention of the Rights of the Child and other international and domestic instruments.
The bill ignores any need to resonate with, let alone apply principles embodied in the Young Offenders Act 1993, and other relevant legislation that compels responsiveness to a child or young person’s developmental stage and factors that impinge upon the relationship to crime. This includes the central importance of the best interests of the child as a guiding principle to support their development.
There is a heading, ‘What is the point of medical assessment?’:
The bill provides a fig leaf of objectivity for the process of imposing an order by invoking the involvement of medical practitioners without clarifying the nature of the necessary medical assessment or other inquiry. Given the lack of specificity, it is hard to see this as anything more than a device for ignoring expectations and protections associated with mental health processes. Instead, a new potentially convenient ‘too-hard’ basket will be created into which the courts can consign individual children and young people who may present the risk of acting out problematic and challenging behaviour.
The lack of safeguards in this bill makes the creation of this new basis for depriving children and young people of liberty highly concerning. This is not the least because the bill resorts to vague concepts such as sexual instincts or violent impulses as a basis for justifying the imposition of an order. On what basis will the Supreme Court interpret such bio-socialogical concepts? If these are objective categories appropriate for and amenable to medical assessment why are they not dealt with through existing legislative arrangements, notably the Mental Health Act 2009? Even if the relevant propensities are not deemed to be mental illnesses as defined in this act, any illness or disorder of the mind or excluded through the operation of schedule 1 of the act has certain conduct not indicating mental illness, what are they and why is a medical professional required to assess them? What recourse does the bill provide to an SRO or a RYO to dispute or challenge the presumably medical opinion offered?
Similarly, if a medical opinion is seen to be sufficiently probative to justify indefinite detention, why is there no mandated requirement that it is to be accompanied by a prescribed treatment or therapeutic regime to address identified medical and other deficits? This is not required as part of an initial order and ongoing monitoring and review. How can a child or young person, protect their interests in the face of potential detention in perpetuity? Is there no need to create and sustain the conditions for rehabilitation?
There is a heading, 'What protections do children and young people need in this context?':
There is a stark contrast between the absence of protections for the rights of a child or young person in the bill and provisions available in various parts of the Mental Health Act 2009, including as detailed with respect to: Part 5, Treatment Orders, Part 6, Treatment of Care Plans, and Part 8, Further protections that cover issues as varied as a community visitor scheme and access to interpreters.
Minimal and statutorily enshrined protective conditions should apply to any new order enabled by the bill. The following tables mention a number of potential protections. For example, requirements for a detailed and funded therapeutic and developmental plan, and access to independent advocacy. There is a heading, 'Repeat offending and recidivism: what does it really tell us?':
The bill says nothing about why and how the youth justice system has failed to prevent a child or young person who is being subject to that system from becoming a serious repeat offender or recidivist young offender. Attending to this question probably would do more for community safety in the long term rather than penalising and stigmatising a handful of individuals.
There is a remaining paragraph but that refers to the tables, which I now seek leave to table. The first one is Table 1, 'Major concern for the proposed amendments to the Criminal Law (Sentencing Act) 1988'. The second table is Table 2, 'Major concerns for the proposed amendments to the Sentencing Act 2017'. The third table is, 'Major concerns with proposed amendments to the Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders Act) 2015'.
Leave granted.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN: I should have alerted the chamber that, whilst this letter was distributed to honourable members, the letter is addressed to the Hon. John Rau, the Deputy Premier and Attorney-General, and so these questions that have been raised in this report have been brought to the attention of the government post 15 October 2017. It was delivered via email so I think we can safely assume that it was on that day. I would be interested for the government to address some of those issues which were raised, I assume in the second reading—well, I ask for it to be in the second reading summing-up.
I have a letter from the Law Society, which I also intend to read into Hansard, given that we are dealing with this bill urgently. I alert honourable members that it is 10 pages long and is dated 13 October 2017, is addressed to the Hon. John Rau MP, Attorney-General, and was via email, so I think we can safely assume that it was received on 13 October. I ask honourable members to note the dates of these submissions, as it is a credit to the Guardian and the Law Society—and I understand there may also be one from the Bar Association that another member is going to draw our attention to—that they have taken the time, under extreme pressure, to at least give some guidance or information to honourable members. This is a courtesy, I should say, that has not necessarily been extended to members by the government. The paragraphs are numbered and I intend to read it all into Hansard:
1. I refer to the Statutes Amendment (Recidivist and Repeat Offenders) Bill 2017 ('the Bill') introduced to the Parliament on 28 September 2017.
2. The Bill builds upon existing provisions in the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988 ('the Sentencing Act') which concern both youth and adult offenders and expands upon the category of offenders for whom there is a presumption against release on bail.
3. Under the Bill, a person will be taken to be a serious repeat offender (SRO) if they have been convicted of committing, on at least three separate occasions, any of a number of specified serious offences. Furthermore, a youth will be declared a recidivist young offender (RYO) if the youth has been convicted of committing, on at least two or three separate occasions any of a number of specified serious offences.
4. The Bill proposes to extend the provisions of the Sentencing Act, the Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Act 2015 (SA) ('the HRO Act') and the Bail Act 1985 (SA) ('the Bail Act') to apply to declared SROs and RYOs. This includes being subject to the provisions of the HRO Act whereby an application can be made for the extended supervision and detention of high risk offenders (both violent and sexual) beyond the completion of their sentence, and orders for indefinite detention under the Sentencing Act.
5. The Society has considered the Bill and has a number of concerns in relation to the proposed provisions, in particular in their application to young offenders. The Society's comments and concerns in relation to the proposed amendments are outlined below.
6. The serious implications of the Bill, addressed below, are such that the Society urges the government to defer the presentation of the Bill to the Parliament pending a detailed process of consultation with relevant stakeholders. This will allow the Society the time needed to provide a more comprehensive submission. The Society is concerned that this Bill is being rushed into the Parliament, without explanation for such a course of action, despite its serious implications.
Orders to protect the safety of the community
7. The Bill seeks to expand section 23 of the Sentencing Act, which provides for the making of indefinite detention orders for offenders incapable of controlling, or unwilling to control, sexual instincts, to include both SROs and RYOs.
8. Indefinite detention orders should be reserved for exceptional cases which involve serious and repeat sexual offenders. The Society does not support the extension of this provision to both adults and youths regarded as 'unwilling to control violent impulses' as proposed in the Bill.
9. The Society considers that to impose pre-emptive limitations on a person's right to liberty, even after they have completed and served their punishment, should be severely restricted to the exceptional case in which a person has been medically assessed as incapable or unwilling to control their sexual instincts.
10. The Society notes that the provisions of the High Risk Offenders (HRO) Act already allow for extended supervision orders of declared violent offenders, as well as serious sexual offenders, meeting the needs for protection of the community in certain necessary cases.
11. The proposed amendments to section 23 orders, go much further, allowing for indefinite detention of a person without charge until further order, and therefore represent an extreme curtailment of individual liberty and human rights. This type of order should be reserved for the extreme cases of repeat sexual offenders, and should not be similarly expanded to violent offenders.
12. If the proposed expansions to section 23 of the Sentencing Act are pursued, the Society submits that the circumstances in which a person can become subject to such an order should be limited. The application of this provision should not be automatic, particularly in relation to RYOs.
Youth offenders
13. The extension of the section 23 orders as noted above to young offenders, convicted of non-sexual offences, who are still in the early stages of development and for whom rehabilitation should be the primary objective in sentencing, is strongly opposed by the Society.
14. I refer to the Society’s letter to you of 10 August 2017 in relation to the Statutes Amendment (Youths Sentenced as Adults) Bill 2017…which highlighted a number of serious concerns with this Bill and the proposed amendments to the Young Offenders Act 1993 (SA) ('the Young Offenders Act').
15. At present, the Young Offenders Act recognises the developmental stage of young offenders and makes provision for the 'care, correction and guidance necessary for their development into responsible and useful members of the community and the proper realisation of their potential'.
16. The current Bill is another attempt by this Government to seek to treat children and young offenders as adults. They should not be treated as such, for very good reason. As noted in the letter of 10 August 2017, youths who commit serious offences or offences that form part of a pattern of repeated illegal conduct are not adults; their offending frequently demonstrates they are children who have not yet developed the requisite moral reasoning (such as prudence, empathy, self-regulation), or cognitive brain development of the frontal lobe (where higher mental processing is carried out, such as problem-solving, judgement, impulse control, planning) rendering them incapable of making 'adult decisions'.
17. From their pattern of repeat offending it is evident that they have not yet achieved the mastery of skills, emotions and thought processes to desist offending, nor have the positive scaffolding around them when in the community to develop and maintain a life beyond offending.
18. The safety of the community, the very premise and justification for this Bill, will be much better served by addressing what is causing the delay in the development of those skills, emotions and thought processes.
19. This Bill disregards fundamental principles established under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child…and the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice ('the Beijing Rules') when considering changes to sentencing laws.
20. These well-established principles require the best interests of the child to be a primary consideration and that any sentences imposed on young offenders be proportionate to both the seriousness of the offence and to the circumstances of the offender.
21. The Bill proposes that if a youth is declared a RYO, then the sentencing court is not bound to ensure that the sentence it imposes for the offence is proportional to the offence.
22. Furthermore, the Bill provides that a young person who has been previously convicted of three prescribed offences (which would include, for example, non-violent vehicle offences such as driving to escape Police pursuit which do not result in death or injury to any person) would be automatically eligible for medical assessment and a declaration under section 23 of the Sentencing Act to be detained until further order, even after completion of their sentence. The Society strongly opposes this provision.
23. The sentencing of young offenders is an area of policy that has been the subject of consideration and debate for many years by a broad range of experts drawn from a variety of societies; where, over the past 25 years, a comprehensive set of principles has been developed based on the debate and existing research; where those principles have now been adopted by the international community; and where research continues to demonstrate that the fundamental direction and intent of the principles remain appropriate.
There are footnotes, but as honourable members have had access to this letter, I will not seek to read them out. It continues:
24. It should be expected in those circumstances that policy development in this area would be well considered, not reactive but most importantly, evidence based.
25. This Bill (like the Statutes Amendment (Youths Sentenced as Adults) Bill) fails to address the contradiction between its failure to have adequate regard to rehabilitation and whilst professing the safety of the community as the primary consideration.
26. As noted in our letter of 10 August, not only is failing to provide children with adequate rehabilitation is a breach of their human rights, as established under the international principles note above, but will also fail to deter future offending. A number of studies have shown that young offenders given more severe penalties are more likely to offend than those given less severe penalties, and that a longer term in detention does not deter from future offending.
27. Locking up young people for longer is more likely to impede the prospect of rehabilitation upon release from detention. Thus the proposed Bill runs contrary to the aim of decreasing recidivism and increasing community protection.
28. The Bill seeks to mandate the safety of the community as outweighing all other considerations where, for the reasons set out above, in the case of youths there are a number of other very important factors that need to be taken into account, in order to achieve what is in the best interests of the child and the community.
The disproportionate effect of the Bill on the Aboriginal community
29. The Society notes the overrepresentation of Aboriginal people in the criminal justice system. These blanket provisions will impact disproportionately on Aboriginal people and further contribute to the already catastrophic levels of Aboriginal incarceration in this country.
30. Aboriginal youths are one of the most vulnerable groups in our community and are grossly overrepresented in the youth justice system. One in five children and young people in secure care are under the Guardianship of the Minister and almost half (47.9%) of children and young people in secure care identify as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander.
31. These statistics are of great concern and point to the fact that the social and systemic drivers of offending in the community at large, but particularly in the Aboriginal community, are not being addressed.
32. South Australia currently has the third highest rate of Aboriginal incarceration in Australia. The Bill will only continue to exacerbate what can already be aptly described as an Aboriginal incarceration epidemic and further disadvantage and marginalise the Aboriginal community.
The presumption against Bail
33. The Society strongly opposes any extension to the presumption against bail. The proposed amendments to section 10A of the Bail Act, seek to expand the presumption against bail to any applicant who has been declared an RYO or who is a SRO.
34. The wording of these provisions suggests that they are intended to apply to a person who has at any time been declared a RYO or a SRO, regardless of whether they are still subject to any proceedings with respect to those classifications under either the Sentencing or HRO Acts.
35. The provisions also suggest that the presumption against bail will operate regardless of the offence the person is seeking bail for. On this basis, the Society understands that the provisions could operate against a person (including a youth) who had been declared a RYO or SRO 10 years ago, and was seeking to bail for a charge as minor as disorderly behaviour or similar.
36. Such a situation is clearly beyond the means necessary for protection of the community, which section 10A is designed to protect, and will only serve to increase the pressure on the already overcrowded prison system.
37. The amendment in its present form is strongly opposed. If amendments to section 10A in light of proposed changes to this legislation are pursued (which is opposed), it is suggested that they only apply to RYOs or SROs who are currently subject to proceedings with respect to those categorisations, seeking bail only in respect of certain serious prescribed serious offences which should be designated in section 10A.
38. For the reasons noted above, the Society strongly opposes the presumption against bail for RYOs. This constitutes a breach of their human rights as well as being contrary to well-established international principles such as the Beijing Rules which consider the detention of children a last resort. RYOs would be much better served by being kept in the community, complying with strict bail conditions whilst being in engaged in rehabilitation and support services.
39. This Bill needs to be considered in the context of a raft of recent Bills which [are] fundamentally inconsistent in approach to the traditional view of the criminal law. Instead of looking at the circumstances of the offending, the circumstances of the offender and matters of deterrence, which will have regard also to the safety of the community, the Government seeks to override this approach by looking predominantly at the safety of the community via incarceration only.
An 'unwillingness' to control violent impulses
40. The Society notes the absence of any medical or external evidence accompanying the Bill to support the need for the HRO’s expansion beyond sexual offending to an unwillingness to control violent impulses.
41. The Society questions whether an 'unwillingness' to control violent impulses, is a matter which doctors are willing, or able to express opinions?
42. Whilst an unwillingness to control violent impulses may be, for an example an aspect of an antisocial personality disorder, is it recognised within psychiatry as a treatable or untreatable condition as such?
43. A basis in medical opinion—which clearly exists in relation to sexual instincts, may or may not exist in relation to violent impulses and is a matter which the Parliament should consider before enacting this Bill.
44. Implicit in all of the existing case law and legislation is a strong policy requirement for treatment. The Society questions whether judges will consider it desirable that they be called upon to make preventative detention orders, purely on the basis of 'community safety', without regard to medical opinion, if indeed none exists on this topic.
45. As a further note, the Society submits that any assessment of a youth offender under the proposed amendments to the HRO Act, be done by a psychiatrist or psychologist experienced in childhood and adolescence and that any assessment should be done holistically and take into account the protective factors and views of other professionals involved with the young person and their family.
46. The Society is particularly concerned by the definition of what constitutes 'unwilling'. It is by reference to whether there is a 'significant risk' that the person would, in circumstances that are reasonably likely to arise, fail to exercise appropriate control of the person's violent impulses. It is important to note that the word 'significant' has been judicially defined, albeit in different circumstances, to mean that anything which is not trivial, is significant. Given the circumstances of an offender who, by definition, will have already committed at least two serious violent criminal offences before being the subject of the provision, and that there is no indication, either in the Bill, or elsewhere, that the government intends to do any more by way of early intervention or rehabilitation, it will be difficult for a court not to conclude that there would be a relevant significant risk. The Society is concerned that the practical effect of the definition is that, overwhelmingly in cases where the provision applies, the end result will be indefinite detention. This is reminiscent of the so-called 'three strikes' policy adopted previously in some States of America and which was demonstrated to have failed demonstrably.
Transitional provisions
47. The Society has serious concerns about the transitional provisions contained in the Bill, which as drafted, will apply regardless of when the relevant offence was committed or when the person was sentenced for that offence. These clearly reactionary provisions are against the principle that a person should be sentenced against the laws that prevailed at the time of the commission of the offence, particularly when there is a proposed curtailment of fundamental human rights and liberties.
48. Another serious concern in relation to the Bill being applied retrospectively, is that current prisoners could be held indefinitely even though the sentencing judge at the time would obviously could not have foreseen that possibility. Applying punishments retrospectively is a violation of human rights.
Non-parole periods
49. The Society notes that the Bill proposes that any non-parole period for SROs must be fixed at least four-fifths the length of the sentence. This is also proposed to apply to RYOs.
50. The Society has consistently argued this year that the government approach to an automatic discount of 40 per cent for early guilty pleas should be reviewed. However, the Society has also consistently argued that there is already too much interference, generally, in the exercise of the judicial discretion with respect to sentencing. In the circumstances, the Society does not support the proposal that, in the circumstances identified the non-parole period must be at least four fifths the length of the sentence.
Interim Orders
51. The Bill creates a scheme whereby an interim order can be made detaining the offenders who are the subject of an application, under section 23 of the Sentencing Act. The Bill also precludes the release of the offender, for example, the release of an adult offender on parole, whilst the section 23 application is being determined.
52. In effect, the proposed amendments will make the head sentence, the only sentence that applies to persons subject to section 23 applications.
53. The Society is informed of many cases of prisoners who do not get access to programs until after the commencement of their non-parole period. This is concerning as it denies prisoners access to rehabilitation for most of their sentence. It also denies them a period of parole, being a supervised period post release in which their return to the community can be monitored and (hopefully) supported in the interest of the safety of the community.
54. Furthermore, what recourse is available to a prisoner who is subject to an application which delayed their release until the end of their sentence and the application is unsuccessful?
55. It is clear that the Bill aims to increase the length of imprisonment for offenders. The Society questions whether the Government plans to have a stronger focus on addressing the cause of offenders' criminal behaviour whilst they are in prison, or will it proceed with locking people up indefinitely at a significant cost to the community?
Additional remarks
56. The Society supports the release on license with conditions as a sentencing option in the case of SROs but that should apply to the period between the completion of the non-parole period and the head sentence. Offenders should be participating in rehabilitation programs during that period. That approach incorporates the dual aspects of deterrence from further offending and assistance in being rehabilitated effectively back into the community.
57. As noted above, it is of concern, that, despite recent emphasis on the importance of rehabilitation by many commentators and stakeholders, including the Victims of Crime Commissioner, the current government approach to recidivism is to focus on incarceration. To be clear, the Society acknowledges the importance of an appropriate custodial sentence and that necessarily involves, at times, lengthy custodial sentences for serious offending. The concern of the Society is that the government has failed to strike an appropriate balance between the deterrent effect of a custodial sentence and the need for both early intervention and rehabilitation. Moreover, except in the most exceptional of cases, a prisoner is entitled to know that there is a prospect of release on parole before the completion of the head sentence and that there is a right to release at the end of the head sentence. The knowledge of release into the community is an important factor. It, together with rehabilitation, provides hope and a prospect of a better life post release. The approach demonstrated by the Bill is likely to impede the prospects of rehabilitation and a successful return to the community.
58. It is unfortunate to note, in light of a Bills such as the current Bill and the Statutes Amendment (Youths Sentenced as Adults) Bill, that focus has been lost on addressing recidivism through an appropriate balance of deterrence of imprisonment and early intervention and effective rehabilitation into the community.
59. This Bill will perpetuate the chronic overcrowding in our prisons and is inconsistent with the Government's policy of reducing reoffending by 10% by 2020, which the former Minister for Correctional Services, the Hon Peter Malinauskas MLC, stated would involve a comprehensive approach incorporating early intervention, rehabilitation and reintegration back into the community.
60. This Bill will effectively lock up youths and adults who need help, for longer, and deprive them of the assistance they need, at considerable cost to the community. The Government has acknowledged the cost of over $100,000 per annum for every prisoner.
61. The Bill fails to address the systemic issues that lead to serious repeat offending and will further implode a prison system already at breaking point.
62. The Society notes that where we undermine the focus on rehabilitation, we invariably undermine community safety. We noted the short-sightedness of this approach in our letter of 10 August in relation to the Statutes Amendment (Youths Sentenced as Adults) Bill.
63. It is also a matter of concern that a Bill which fundamentally alters established legal principles is being rushed through the Parliament. The Society is not aware of any consultation having been undertaken with key stakeholders and urges the Government to delay further debate of the Bill until it has properly consulted such stakeholders.
That is signed with the signature block of Tony Rossi, the President of the Law Society. The correspondence that we have received from both the Guardian and the Law Society resoundingly, in my view, condemns this bill. Pointed out by the Law Society, and probably to the disappointment of the Hon. Mr Malinauskas, is the effect of the end of this government's attempt to rehabilitate youths.
This bill represents a significant policy shift by this government. They can talk all they like outside of this chamber. They can produce as many glossy brochures as they want, but you cannot seek to pass a bill through this chamber and expect to be taken seriously that you are committed to rehabilitation. I have always believed, from my earliest days of practising criminal law, that it is critical that rehabilitation be a significant focus because it is a key plank of ensuring community safety. Putting people inside prison and then releasing them without any attempt for them to make a better life for themselves will only lead to reoffending.
The government has adopted an insidious approach to this legislation. It has used the justification of one youth for a major reform to sentencing. I remind members of my comments earlier in my second reading contribution, that this is after we have just debated a reform of the Sentencing Act. There was nowhere that I could see in the justification for those provisions for this extension. This is opportunistic. The government is using a child in a particular circumstance, of which we are not fully apprised—and nor should we be, to protect that child's privacy—ruthlessly to justify this bill. I know that I have not been in this chamber long, but this is, I think, the worst case, certainly, I have seen for underpinning a bill.
It is a contempt of the committed stakeholders in the group. It is holding the Guardian in contempt. They were alerted to this bill by members of this chamber. The Law Society was not consulted by the Attorney: the Attorney came to the Liberal Party and sought the passage of this bill. It is the Liberal Party and other crossbenchers that have sought commentary from people in the community. What does that tell you about this bill? That this is a legislative overreach of the worst kind.
By holding us in contempt, this is holding the people of South Australia in contempt. This parliament deserves better and this chamber deserves better. However, the Liberal Party has taken a restrained course. With correspondence received like that, we would be more than justified to oppose this bill outright. We are not seeking to do that, we are seeking to amend it, to allow applications to be made in relation to use as high-risk offenders, and then we have a sunset clause that will remove the operation of this bill under the guidance of the next parliament so that parliament can properly debate these provisions.
I understand why. This government in its more than 15½ years has been an abject failure when it comes to caring for the most vulnerable children in our society. The government members may proclaim all their progressive credentials in the community, but this bill cuts it away. You cannot be a member of the Labor Party and say that you support the most vulnerable in the community. That is no longer part of the Labor brand. The Labor brand stands for oppressing the most vulnerable and treating them with contempt.
Rehabilitation used to be a key plank of Labor Party policy—it is gone. It is gone with this bill the moment it was brought into this chamber. This bill is a symbol of this Labor government's complete swing to a hard right philosophical position on the justification that it is going to bury its pitiful record looking after the youths in its care. In other words, its record with youths and now, more recently, the elderly with Oakden, is pitiful, absolutely pitiful. What is even more shameful, even after, there is really no apology or contrition, just political rhetoric.
The philosophy of this bill with unlimited detention (which in some cases is justified for those who cannot control their sexual impulses) was more commonplace in Europe in the thirties. We need to have a constructive debate in our community about vulnerable children and the care that the state provides them, not political rhetoric, not hard on crime rhetoric, which is simply designed to make the Labor government look good in less informed parts of the community, less informed—
The Hon. K.J. Maher interjecting:
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN: The Hon. member Kyam Maher says that—who have not had the benefit of experience in the criminal law system, who live their lives and rely on the expertise of others. Yes, they have had the effects of crime, but what you are doing is creating a crime factory in prisons. The Hon. Kyam Maher should be disgraced since he is a leader of the left, a disgrace in the left, because he should be holding up the progressive ideals of the Labor Party, but he washes his hands of them. I do not hold the community's views in contempt.
What I am saying is that not all of them have experienced crime, not all of them have experienced the prison system, and we need to educate them and bring their understanding up that rehabilitation is critically important—critically important. That is the responsibility of those of us who have had experience in the criminal justice system and as leaders in the community. We should not preach to them with propaganda. My position is supported by the Guardian and the Law Society—I repeat, the Guardian and the Law Society.
The irony of this legislation is that it claims to be founded on community safety, as I said. It is the failure of the government in developing its youths who are in the criminal justice system and seeking rehabilitation. That is the failure we are really debating today. There was a time when the Labor government was championing the rights of the vulnerable, but now it is the oppressor. So much for its progressive legacy! I ask the minister to address some of the issues raised in the letters of the Law Society and the Guardian in the summing-up of the second reading debate.
The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (17:25): I rise to speak to the second reading of this bill, which I describe as a case study of how not to manage complex legal matters. The bill is disrespectful of the parliament in the manner in which it has been introduced and is proposed to be debated, but more importantly it is disrespectful of the community, especially those in the community who have real and legitimate interests in the criminal justice system. None of these individuals or groups have been consulted by the Attorney-General, and instead the proposal is for the bill to be rushed through to completion today.
At the outset, I will say that I associate myself with the remarks of the Hon. Andrew McLachlan. Good on him for reading into the Hansard what the Law Society said. I do not know how many people the Law Society was able to get working on that submission, I suspect it was either one or a very small number of people, but they probably were working day and night to get that to us because they knew how important this legislation was and they wanted members of parliament to have the best available information. Similarly the Hon. Andrew McLachlan read onto the record the submission of the Guardian for Children and Young People and tabled the tables that were part of that submission.
The question that needs to be asked first of all is: why are we rushing this bill through, against all of the principles this chamber has worked on for many years, including the ability for members of parliament to seek to have matters adjourned so that they can properly consult with stakeholders? Why is it that the bill is being rushed through now? The answer, we are being told, is that it is urgent. Why is it urgent? Well, we are told that there is a single hard case that is driving this legislation. I will come back to some of the details of that case—not too many of the details because, as the Hon. Andrew McLachlan said, there are issues of privacy and privilege. In fact, I do not think I have anything that is new, given what has been said—maybe a little bit more information—but I certainly do not know the name of the person involved, I do not know much at all about them.
The difficulty is that the bill goes much further than the one hard case that is the sole rationale for us rushing the bill through. Do not take my word for it: take the Attorney-General's word for it. When we discovered just a few days ago that this bill was to be rammed through today, I went back and had a look at the Attorney's second reading speech, which again, like today, he incorporated without reading, and the entire bill was passed in probably maybe 15 minutes in the lower house. But, when the minister summed up the second reading speech, he said:
It is an unusual matter, and it is a matter that obviously is proceeding in a way that is unusual. I can assure the house that I would not be proceeding in this way if I did not feel it necessary to do so.
Okay, that sounds fair enough: he has to proceed because it is urgent. But then he goes on:
In terms of the question about the genesis of bits and pieces of this—
I think that is Attorney-General talk for clauses and parts of the bill—
I think it is fair to say that, inasmuch as this refers to some matters, they are matters of concern to me which were not necessarily of acute concern to me because they were not presently matters which were threatening to cause any disruption to the community. They were matters that had some longer standing, and it was my intention that in due course I would get around to looking at those matters.
The Hon. Andrew McLachlan used the words ‘opportunistic’ and ‘legislative overreach’. Let’s look at opportunistic. The Attorney has said that he has brought a whole package of measures, many of which are completely unrelated to the one hard case that is driving this legislation, and it was convenient for him to bundle it all in and convenient for him as well to not consult anyone in the community about it.
That is an appalling way to legislate, so, I understand why the Hon. Andrew McLachlan and his party have tried to disaggregate this bill. I will come later to whether I think that is the right approach but I understand why they are doing it. The Attorney said there are urgent things, yet there are a whole lot of things in here that are completely unrelated to that urgent case. Let’s have a bit of a look at the time frame for this. It is easy to stand up here and say, ‘The government has rushed it through,’ but let’s have a look at the time frames.
On the information that has been provided to me, it seems as if the Attorney-General’s Department first found out about this hard case around about 21 or 22 September. It then, I understand, pulled out all stops to get legislation drafted in a week and it was tabled in the lower house of parliament on Thursday 28 September, so that is only a week. As I said, it went through. The Attorney, when asked, ‘Have you consulted anyone?’ said, ‘No, no, no, there’s no time at all to consult anyone, so, no, we haven’t consulted anyone.’ Mind you, there was that whole week, since presumably some instructions were provided to parliamentary counsel, but anyway there were several days there where consultation could have at least commenced.
However, you then fast-forward nearly two weeks to last Wednesday 11 October, and that was when the members of the Legislative Council were told that we had to finalise the bill today. I sought an urgent briefing and I obtained a briefing two days later on Friday 13 October. I will take the opportunity to thank the Attorney’s staff for a very detailed and frank briefing; I have no problem with the briefing they gave me. What I then did was quickly send off letters to a small targeted group of stakeholders who I knew would have something to say about this: the Bar Association, the Law Society, the Guardian and the Council for Civil Liberties.
The Hon. Andrew McLachlan has read into the record two of those submissions but a third one that arrived in fact only yesterday was from the Bar Association. It is my intention to read not the whole of it, but some part of it into the record. I will say that we probably would not need to do this if we had been through a proper process but, otherwise, the official record of the parliament in this place will show that some pretty dodgy legislation may have got through and the casual reader will be saying, ‘Surely stakeholders had something to say about it. This is quite draconian in its terms.’ So, it is important for us to put these submissions on the record.
All the groups that put in submissions complained about the process. The submission I refer to is from yesterday afternoon. Ian Robertson SC, the President of the South Australian Bar Association, states:
Dear Mark,
Further to [your] email advising of the above Bill, I attach a letter in response. The letter attaches the commentary of the Law society (which we support) and makes some general observations about this Bill and the process that sees it come before Parliament [potentially] tomorrow. A substantive response of our own will not be available in time for that deadline.
The submission, which is addressed to me but which I understand has been circulated to other members, includes a range of observations, some of which are similar to things that the Law Society and the Guardian said, but some of them are different. In its submission in relation to the idea of using a hard case to drive legislation, the Bar Association states:
Reactive legislation is couched with hidden dangers. In endeavouring to address a single mischief, the drafter may inadvertently expose the public, or an individual, to multiple other mischiefs. The unintended consequence of that may be to erode public confidence not only in the State, but also confidence in the State's ability to protect all of its citizens.
The Bar Association goes on to talk a little about the fact that it is a child that is the single hard case that is supposedly driving this bill. The association states:
The treatment of children as adults is a fundamental shift away from accepted social, moral and jurisprudential norms. It should not be undertaken without full consultation and based on empirical evidence. If there is any evidence to justify the extension of existing extreme measures applicable to sexual offenders to child-age and violent offenders, then that should be identified. If the Government has any evidence, they should produce the results they have collated and make them available for public scrutiny and comment. There should be a better reason to undertake systemic and fundamental changes in law and policy than a single, albeit tragic case. There is an old adage that 'hard cases make bad law.'
Then, because it is the Bar Association, they have to actually put in a reference for that quote, which I did not realise goes all the way back to the case of Winterbottom in 1842. We have known for a very long time that hard cases make for bad law. The Bar Association, quite reasonably I think, feels that the Attorney regularly disregards their commentary in relation to law reform because the submission includes this observation:
On another occasion, the Attorney has expressed the view that Bar association is a mere interest group concerned only about the income of its members. I have expressed our dissatisfaction with those comments publicly. However, lest the refrain be reprised, you will observe that there is nothing in our opposition to the manner in which this Bill comes before the Council that advances the financial position of our members. The passage of the Bill might in fact provide those members substantial employment challenging its terms. The interest we are championing is fairness, the rule of law and the proper operation of the machinery of democracy in this State.
As the gatekeepers of our democratic parliamentary system, the Legislative Council should not be called on to debate proposed legislation of such wide-reaching significance when it comes before the Council in this way. Of course if the Government insists on it being tabled and debated, that is its right. However, it is the Council's right to have the opportunity to consider the bill, obtain advice upon it, and to formulate its position. That is a right that applies no less to the Cross Bench than it does to the Opposition. The competition between these rights should, in my opinion, be determined in favour of informed debate.
The final sentence of the Bar Association's submission states:
The Association will publicly support any reasonable motion that you or your fellow members of the Cross Benches, or the Opposition, might move to oppose the pre-emptory passage of this ill-considered Bill.
Yours sincerely,
Ian Robertson S.C.
President
The rushed consultation undertaken by non-government members has resulted in three quite lengthy and considered responses, but one thing all those responses have in common is that, given more time, they would do even better. They would be able to consult their members and they would have presented an even wider range of arguments in relation to the merits of this bill.
It has now been three and a half weeks since the drafting of the bill started, or two and a half weeks since the drafting of the bill finished, but still not one skerrick of consultation undertaken by the government. So, I want to quickly look at the two aspects of the bill, that is, the part of the bill that deals with a single hard case, the 'young person', which has been referred to, and, secondly, to look at some of the general principles involved in the bill.
As I said, I do not know a great deal about the individual concerned. We have received a briefing from government, and the following information is what I feel comfortable putting on the public record. I think it is pretty much what the Hon. Andrew McLachlan said. We know that this one hard case has hijacked the parliamentary priorities, not just for today but I think for this week and for future weeks, when we should really have been debating it.
We know that it is a young person, which means they are under 18 years of age. We know that they are under the guardianship of the minister. In other words, it is a person for whom we, as a society, have taken responsibility. It is someone who has, presumably, been removed from their family. I do not know anything about their family circumstances, but they are wards of the state, if you like. They are under the guardianship of the minister. That is important because it suggests that we, as a society, owe some responsibility to this person, however badly they have behaved. I am not aware of the crimes they have committed, but they certainly would not be incarcerated in a youth detention centre if they had not committed serious crimes.
So, we know that. We know the person has been sentenced and detained and we also know that their sentence is about to expire. This is where the information starts to become very scant, making it very difficult for the Legislative Council to make proper judgement on this bill. We are told there is evidence that this young person will reoffend if released and that they are a danger to society. They have provided no evidence for that, other than the say-so of government officials. They are effectively asking us to trust them; they have not provided any evidence.
I had a joint briefing with people from the Hon. Kelly Vincent's office, and one of the suggestions we put forward was that if there are psychiatrists' reports that suggest what a danger this young person is to society if they are released, show them to us. Redact all the names, take out all the information that might identify them and let us have at least some expert report, even if it is a one-sided report. We do not even have that. All we have is a sort of whisper around the place that there is a hard case and we need to legislate today. That is a very poor way to manage these things.
We are told that it has to go through today because the way these things work is that the bill has to pass both houses, obviously. The government has its own amendments that will need to go back to the lower house. The Governor needs to give assent and, presumably, the Attorney-General then has to make an urgent application to the Supreme Court in order for this young person to continue to be detained beyond the period of their sentence.
However, the question I still have, and it has not been satisfactorily answered, is whether this is necessary. Is there another way? Let us assume that the objective is the right one and let us accept that this person, for their own sake and the community's sake, needs to be detained for longer. The question that I have is whether a bill like this is the only tool to achieve that. My understanding is that this person, whilst they have been charged, convicted and sentenced, may well have other charges pending, in which case my suggestion to the Attorney-General's staff was, 'If there are other charges, bring them on. Get him into court, and if he is as dangerous as everyone is telling us he is, then he is not going to get bail.' Problem solved.
If there are outstanding charges or things for which he could be brought back before a court before his sentence expires, it would seem to me—and I do not have the Hon. Andrew McLachlan's advantage of having practised very much in a criminal jurisdiction—that that would have been a simpler and, I would have thought, a fairly sure-fire way to make sure that the detention and supervision continues. But the government does not want to go down that path. Maybe the problem is that they think he might get bail. It seems to me that if a judge faced with all the evidence that we are being denied thinks that they deserve bail, maybe it is not as serious as the government is telling us. I do not know any of that; it is pure speculation. That is part of the problem: we are legislating by speculation.
This bill is, obviously, the government's preferred plan A for dealing with this young person, but I have heard no cogent arguments why what I have just suggested as a plan B should not be tried. It seems to me that there may even be other options to the bill that the government has presented. The Hon. Andrew McLachlan mentioned in passing—it was in one of the submissions—that we already have provisions that relate to detaining people against their will, even outside the criminal justice system. The Mental Health Act is a classic example. It is a longstanding regime where people do not have to have committed any offences; we have a system where the state says, 'Look, I'm sorry, but you need to be detained for your protection and for the community's protection.' That is how the mental health system works.
The Attorney and his staff can say, 'Well, someone having uncontrollable violent or sexual urges is not a mental illness.' Well, no, it is not, but what I am saying is: the advantage of using the mental health regime—and they could have brought amendments to that legislation towards this—is that it is partnered with a therapeutic response. It is not just locking them up and throwing away the key. That is the difference between the mental health system and the criminal justice system. So I am disappointed that that option was not pursued.
In terms of the actual merits of the bill, as I have said, it goes far beyond the young person who we are told is the rationale for it. For example, there is a whole provision in here in relation to the presumption of bail. That has nothing to do with the young person who is currently detained. It is not a question of bail. It is a question of their sentence expiring and the fact that they, in the normal course of events, would be released, because that is how the criminal justice system works. You do the crime, you do the time, and then you get released. So the fact that reforms to the bail regime are in this legislation is completely irrelevant. The minister himself admitted that he has found a bit of a grab bag of things that he had been thinking about for a while, and he has chosen to attach them to this bill so that we will let them go through without too much fuss, because there is a hard case, a bad case, that is driving the whole thing.
There are four questions, I think, that spring to my mind in terms of the actual legal merits of this bill. The first question is: is it ever appropriate to keep a person locked up even after their sentence has concluded and even if they have not committed any further offences? My answer to that is actually, yes, there are sometimes cases where we need to keep someone, for the protection of the community and for their own benefit, locked up. People have mentioned people with uncontrollable sexual urges who are a danger to the community. Yes, there is a regime where that makes sense, but this bill, with the complete absence of consultation and the absence of any therapeutic intervention, does not cut it. But as a matter of principle I am prepared to say, 'Yes, I am prepared to consider locking people up after their sentences have expired: it is sometimes the right thing to do.'
Even if we accept that, what evidence should be provided? What is the burden of proof? Who is the decision-maker? What are the rules of natural justice around what has been described as indefinite detention (because that is what this bill provides for)? You could have someone, in a worst-case scenario, who does their time in gaol and they then stay in gaol for the rest of their lives. This bill can achieve that result, so I want a few checks and balances in there, and they are not in the current bill. So that is the second question: what evidence, burden of proof, natural justice?
The third question is that once a person is detained, how and when is it reviewed? Again, I do not think the bill deals with this adequately. Certainly, judges might be like a dentist or an optometrist and say, 'See the receptionist on the way out'—well, not on the way out, because you are not going out—'we'll make an appointment for you in a year's time. We'll come back and see whether you should still be locked up.'
The fourth question—and this goes to the heart of it—is: what assistance are we providing these offenders to give us any chance that they will ever get back into the community and live normal lives? What regime is in this bill that provides assistance to these people? The answer is that there is none at all. The Hon. Andrew McLachlan referred to the secure therapeutic care framing principles. The fact is that a lot of people have spent a lot of time thinking about how these things should work. That is why they have gone to all the trouble of coming up with principles, referring to international treaties and best practice from other countries. Is that the way we do things in South Australia? No. We draft a bill in a couple of days and we rush it through parliament and tell the upper house, 'Don't even think about trying to delay it or to consult further in the community, because we won't let you.'
The Hon. Andrew McLachlan used a phrase I like, and I will probably shamelessly steal it on other occasions: he talked about the 'conga line of incompetence'. I think that does sum up how a lot of this is done. This is not the first time we have debated child welfare and youth criminal justice in this place. There is a sad tale to be told. I think the way I would sum up this entire legislation in four words—because apparently three and four-word slogans are the flavour of the month—is that this is 'the too hard basket'; what we are legislating for is the too hard basket. We are talking about people whom we have failed. Maybe with this young person in question the failure is the failure of us as a society, as their guardian, to care for them properly, a failure of intervention early enough, failures across the board. I am not saying it is a failure of their home life, of their parents, but a failure across the board.
We also have to remember, when applying this new regime to young people—especially to someone who is, say, 17½ or 17¾, even if they are 16—that if they are kept in long enough they are going to end up in an adult gaol, and the therapeutic regime in adult gaol, as we have heard from some of the submissions that have been read out, is very, very poor. I have mentioned it here before, but if we are to take to heart the words of the Thinker in Residence the Labor government brought out some years ago, Peggy Hora, the judge from America, who said that yes, sometimes we have to lock people up but we want them to come back out better, then we either lock them up forever or we put in a system that has them come back better. This is the first of those; this is the 'lock 'em up forever'.
I think this bill is ill-conceived. It deserves to be opposed at the second reading and the Greens will oppose it at the second reading. However, we understand that the Liberals have a plan as well to let it go into committee and then have a look at some amendments that confine its operation, so I am not going to divide on the second reading. I just want on the record that the Greens oppose this bill. We look forward to the committee stage of the debate because that will be an opportunity for us to tease out which elements of this bill the government says are absolutely essential to deal with this one case and which bits of it are, in fact, the minister's grab bag of issues that he has opportunistically attached to this bill. With those words, the Greens are opposed to this bill but we will not divide. We look forward to the committee stage.
The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (17:52): Advance SA is supportive of this bill as we understand there is an urgency for it to pass to address a particular urgent situation that the Department for Correctional Services has notified the government about. From time to time parliament is asked to put aside normal procedure and conventions and consider bills as a matter of urgency, as is the case with this bill. However, I want to put on the record that this is not good practice and does not allow for full consideration or consultation on matters. We in this place cannot be experts on everything that comes before us, and we need time to consider the implications of what the government is proposing.
Today, I received an email from Ms Penny Wright, the Guardian for Children and Young People, that essentially echoed this. She said that neither she nor the regular stakeholders were consulted about this bill. Notwithstanding this she raised a number of issues, and one particular issue that I thought needed attention was with regard to the expiration of extended supervision orders. Essentially, Ms Wright said that one of the framing principles of an order should be that it is a measure of last resort and should be for a specified and limited amount of time. I believe the government has addressed this first measure; however, the bill does not seem to address the issue of the expiration of extended supervision orders or whether rolling orders can be issued against an individual continuously. I would be grateful for clarification on this from the government.
I understand the matter that this bill seeks to address concerns a juvenile and, as such, only a few details as to why this urgency is needed can be divulged. In short, the government is asking us to trust it with the information it has without providing that to us. In my time here I can recall this situation of being asked to simply trust the government occurring on several occasions. Each time I have been very uncomfortable about giving my blind support to the government, but I have done so because I have been told that it is in the interests of community safety. I want it noted that while I agree on this occasion, this may not always be the case going forward.
The Hon. K.L. VINCENT (17:54): There is so much to cover with this bill that it is difficult to know where to begin, but can I start by saying, as other members have said, that the Dignity Party is very concerned that the government is again expecting the parliament to pass a bill that was in the lower house for all of about 10 or 15 minutes and was not discussed in that house, and that has arrived in our chamber today with an expectation that we will go through all stages and pass that bill today.
I will not rehash the many points that have been made by my colleagues, the Hon. Mr McLachlan and the Hon. Mr Parnell, and to some extent the Hon. Mr Darley, but I would certainly like to put on the record that the Dignity Party shares similar concerns. The several submissions on this bill have been read by the Hon. Mr McLachlan onto the record, and I thank him for that, because it means that the rest of us will not have to do the same, but I want it known that I take those submissions very seriously.
Usually, the forming of legislation goes something like this. I will oversimplify it, because of the time, and the lack of time that we have to discuss this bill. Usually, each house of parliament, the upper and the lower house, will discuss the bill at length after it is drafted, after it has gone through consultation, after it has reached a point where all the relevant people in the community, civil and professional, are happy with it. It will pass one house and then the other, then it will be assented to and then it will become law.
Then, there is a separate arm, the court, judges and magistrates, who are expected to make judgements based on those laws and see how they might impact individual people, individual cases, that come before it. It is the judge's or the magistrate's job to judge how an individual law should be handed down to a particular individual person. It is our job in the parliament, usually, to make broad laws that apply to everybody, and it is the judge's job to assess how that law should apply in individual cases.
The judge has to take into account the background of that person before them, the particular needs of that person before them, and what led that person to make the decision that has led them to be before a judge. Interestingly, this evening, the parliament is being asked—in fact, is being demanded, because we have been given no option, it would appear, but to pass this legislation today—to play both roles, to pass legislation that will apply to everyone, ultimately, all 1.7 million people in South Australia, and to be the judge, because we are passing this legislation on the strength of a particular, very difficult case. We are being asked to pass a law that affects everybody in this state because of one person.
I do not deny that it is a very difficult case. I do not deny that it is a very serious case, with very serious consequences, but I do very strongly object to the fact that I as a parliamentarian, and everyone in this room here this evening, am being asked to act as a judge. Not only that, we are being asked to act as judges with less information than a judge would have to do that job. As previous speakers have said, we have not seen the psychiatric or psychological reports that have been made about this particular young person, so we have no information, or very little information, about their background, one that I understand involves significant trauma. It is one that obviously has led them to come under the guardianship of the minister, and that is not something that happens lightly; it is not something that happens overnight. That is something that happens with significant difficulty and trauma in the life of that person. Other than that, we have no detail as to this young person.
We know, of course, that they are a young person. In other words, they are a child. They are under the age of 18, which means that their brain, technically, psychologically, biologically, has not finished forming. We know because of that they are likely to need significant investment and significant support in trying to rehabilitate wherever possible. It may not be possible. It may be possible for this person to rehabilitate, it may not be.
I do not know—I am not a psychologist and I am certainly not a judge, although I am being asked to act as one this evening—but I do know that, from the submissions and from the correspondence that I have received, it seems very clear from my perspective that this young person has not been given enough support, enough investment, enough opportunity to rehabilitate. It certainly does not appear that the significant trauma they appear to have lived through in their young life, in a child's life so far, has been adequately taken into account in dealing with this case.
As other speakers have said, I am also very, very concerned about the fact that ultimately this bill is not even only about this very difficult and very significant case. As the Hon. Mr Darley has said, sometimes we do have to deal with cases urgently and without the time frame that we would usually expect, but it is usually because there is a case or a situation that is very significant, very serious and that could not be foreseen and that is only about that one case.
But in this particular bill, neither of those things are true because we know that this young person's detention is due to expire on Friday (I think I am correct in saying) but we cannot possibly accept that it has suddenly occurred to the department for public prosecutions or SAPOL or the government, we cannot possibly expect that they did not know until today that that person's detention was due to expire on Friday. We cannot possibly be expected to accept that that is oversight, that could not be foreseen, that was not predictable.
When that person was put into detention, this young person, this child—and I am going to say that word a few times because I think it is important that we are discussing the future of the life of one person who is still, biologically, psychologically, a child—I cannot accept that the government, that SAPOL, that the department for public prosecutions simply forgot or did not remember or did not foresee that that detention period would have a time limit on it that would need to be dealt with long before three days before it was due to expire.
I also do not believe that this bill is only about the very difficult case of that one young person, that one child, because as other speakers have already said, and as the Attorney-General himself has said in the other place as outlined in the quotes read by the Hon. Mr Parnell, there are other elements to this bill that are not to do with the case of this child that are arguably similar subjects in relation to which the Attorney-General thought, 'Since I have got this bill going with this one case, I might as well whack it in there and give it a crack,' because that is apparently the way our Attorney-General legislates in this place and in this state in 2017. If there is something remotely similar to a bill that you are already drafting, just whack it in there, no consultation, not even discussion in the house where it is introduced, the lower house, and have it pass all stages in 10 to 15 minutes.
It is not only about this one young person: it could have very serious consequences for all South Australians, particularly all those who come before the legal system and the child protection system. Also, it does not adequately deal with the particular circumstances of that one young person. If the Attorney-General expects us to act as judge, jury and executioner, then he should at least put in place measures in the bill that deal with the particular circumstances of the person we are judging, that they do have a background of trauma, that they are still under the age of 18, that their brain is still developing and that they have been failed significantly, it would appear, by the system and by those people, formal and informal, who could rightly have been expected to do more if they have ended up under the guardianship of the minister.
That is not something that happens overnight, it is not something that happens lightly and it is not something that happens on a whim, unlike the amendments or the additional factors of the bill that are not to do with this particular young person. It is something that happens to people who have had a great deal of complexity and hardship in their life.
So, in addition to targeting one particular youth in this case, the government bill also brings into force a range of measures that disregard our human rights commitments, our rehabilitation commitments and our investment commitments in the prison system and the corrections system. But, do not take my word for it: there are a number of submissions that have already been read into the record. The Leader of the Government will be pleased to know that I do not intend to rehash all of those, but there are a significant number of submissions that, I would add, have been prepared with great haste because of the lack of consultation on this bill.
Those submissions come from the Guardian for Children and Young People in this state, Ms Penny Wright (the Guardian) who has a responsibility for all young people in the situation in which this young person finds themselves. Not only that, she has actually visited that young person and made an assessment on the situation of that young person, which is much, much more than we in this chamber have had the opportunity to do, yet we are being expected to pass this bill without amendment, if the Attorney-General gets his way.
Not only does the Guardian for Children and Young People in this state have significant concerns about this bill, particularly the unamended version of this bill, but the Law Society submission, prepared as I understand only once a crossbencher alerted them to the existence and the impending passage of this bill, points out that, in its current form, this bill is in breach of fundamental principles established under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Beijing Rules regarding standard minimum rules for the administration of juvenile justice.
I want to say that again: this bill disregards standard minimum rules for the administration of juvenile justice. This is not some lofty, abstract benchmark that we are asking the Attorney-General to meet here: these are the standard minimum rules and, according to the Law Society, which is much more versed in how to apply and interpret laws than I, this bill in its current form does not even meet the minimum standard. Fittingly, I note that today the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare has released figures on young people in child protection and under youth justice supervision for 2015-16. Those national figures indicate that, in Australia, young people in the child protection system were 12 times more likely to also be under youth justice supervision.
Additionally, young Indigenous South Australians are 16 times more likely to have contact with child protection and youth justice supervision. These statistics indicate that it is certainly not just about this one young person. It is about a system—a system that is significantly and unacceptably failing many young people in this state, including this one young person who is allegedly the catalyst for the bill we have before us this evening, even though the measures in it go far beyond the case of this one person.
Here we have a situation where the government has not only failed to use the existing provisions that could have been used to deal with this young person under the high-risk offenders legislation, for example, or to some extent potentially under the Mental Health Act legislation. I do not know because I have not seen the psychiatrist’s or the psychologist’s report about this young person, so I do not know, arguably, whether it would have been suitable to use those pieces of existing legislation. That is why we are here tonight being asked to make sweeping and very severe judgements about this one young person.
The government has failed to use existing provisions and has failed to limit it to this one young person because we know that the bill, as it stands, has many features that are not just to do with this one young person. We know that the government and the system have apparently failed to provide this young person with the investment and the support that may well have seen them not end up in this situation in the first place. Again, I do not know because I am flying by the seat of my pants, as we all are tonight because we do not know the level of information that we arguably need to pass this bill in an informed, comprehensive way—in other words, the information that we could benefit from to do our jobs.
The situation we find ourselves in is between a rock and a hard place because, as the Hon. Mr Parnell has said, I think there may well be a case to keep some people in detention past the expiry of their sentence, the expenditure of their time, so to speak, but whether or not it is right for this person I do not feel qualified to say because I do not have the right information to help me make that judgement, nor should it be my job or anyone’s job in this room here tonight to make that judgement.
I will say, at this stage, that I believe the opposition amendments make a completely unpalatable bill and process slightly less offensive and slightly more professional, so I will, at the very least, be supporting the opposition amendments to make sure that this young person and other young people in this situation at least get supervision as opposed to indefinite detention with no support, with no investment in their ability to develop, as they are still children. Let me say it again: they are still legally and biologically children. However, pending the passage of those amendments, I will reserve my right to make a decision about the third reading of this bill after that.
I will just say at this point that I support the opposition amendments because I think they make an abhorrent bill and an abhorrent process slightly less abhorrent. I am not denying that this young person has obviously done some very serious things and needs to be dealt with but I want to make sure—and in fact I feel I would only be doing my job if we made sure—that that was being done in a comprehensive way with every opportunity for investment, for rehabilitation, for support and for the acknowledgement of the trauma in this person’s background because, at the end of the day, if we do not acknowledge that, we are not actually addressing the problem.
We are only sending this person down a path of reoffending, of being misunderstood and of being isolated, because no-one has acknowledged the real issues that have played a part in leading them to where they are today. Am I saying that with these investments they would absolutely 100 per cent not reoffend? Absolutely not, but I am saying that we owe it to this young person and to everyone in the community to actually do our jobs and make sure that we give every possible avenue the adequate exploration, investigation and implementation. So I will support the Liberal amendments and reserve my right to make judgement on the passage of the third reading, pending that.
The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (18:15): I will be brief because there is still a bit of other business to do, and I will talk much more on this whole issue around young people who are incarcerated and young people who for many reasons cannot live in general society. We are talking about a small percentage but, at the end of the day, first and foremost to me are the victims and also community safety. I look forward to debating the Statutes Amendment (Youths Sentenced as Adults) Bill in the near future, but I want to put on the public record that we do not like having bills rushed through this place either.
The Australian Conservatives have said before that we need, whenever possible, to have proper deliberation and consultation on these bills. We can worry about the blame and who is responsible, and why that young person went off the rails when that young person went off the rails at some point in time, and we can have a look at all of the unfortunate circumstances there, but the reality is that, for some young people at a particular time, incarceration or very close supervision is paramount for them and, as I said, for the victims and community safety generally.
Clearly, whether there was a muck-up somewhere in the Attorney-General's Department or not, we are now faced with this piece of legislation and we have to make a decision as a priority, and yes, it is more encompassing. Had we had more encompassing legislation than this when the government used to talk about being tough on law and order, and had we addressed problems around a small percentage of young people—but, nevertheless, young people who cause havoc through society and cause tragedy to families and loved ones of that family—the fact is we have to deal with what we are dealing with right now.
I advise the council that we will be supporting the government and we will not be supporting the myriad amendments that have been put up, but we say to the Attorney-General and the government, 'You need to not abuse the houses and you need to follow proper protocols as a rule.' I know from my experiences in former parliamentary years that there are times when governments do need urgent legislation put through, and we say that this is one of those times and therefore we will be voting with the government.
The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (18:18): I thank honourable members for their contributions to this debate, and I acknowledge that members have been asked to pass this with the utmost urgency and speed. I acknowledge that we are occasionally called on to consider difficult matters in a short amount of time, and I acknowledge the work that members have done availing themselves to briefings to get things done quickly. I acknowledge many of the contributions that members made and the questions they raised; however, I think some in this chamber may reflect on some of the language that they chose to use and may regret the way they expressed themselves this evening. I think some of the language used does them and us little credit when debating such serious issues.
Very quickly, to address some of the specific questions that were raised by the Hon. Mark Parnell, particularly about burden of proof and natural justice and appeals: under the high-risk offenders act, the application is made by the Attorney-General to the Supreme Court. The court takes into account medical assessments and must be satisfied that the offender is a high-risk offender by considering their offending. The court must assess a risk, and it must be satisfied of an appreciable risk to the safety of the community. The act lists the matters to be taken into account in making this decision.
The act provides for appeals to the Full Court. The order cannot be made for longer than five years and the offender can seek the court's consent for a review of the order at any time. Orders under section 23 of the sentencing act for continued detention are only made by the Supreme Court. The court must consider medical reports and then decide whether to detain the person in custody, with a paramount consideration being the safety of the community.
Section 23 orders can be discharged on application by the offender or the DPP. In addition, an offender subject to a section 23 detention order can apply, and the DPP can apply, for a release on licence. In both cases, the Supreme Court gives paramount consideration to the safety of the community in deciding whether to discharge the order or release the offender on licence. Medical reports are considered. Again, appeals go to the Full Court.
The bill before us generally ensures that those serious repeat offenders, be they adults or youths, who are finishing their sentences but who continue to pose a threat to the safety of the community can be subject to court orders requiring them to either be supervised whilst living in the community or be detained. The bill does this by extending two existing regimes in the criminal justice system that provide for the extended supervision and continued detention of offenders beyond their existing sentence and by building upon the existing provisions in the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act concerning both youth and adult repeat offenders.
The bill also expands the category of offenders for whom there is a presumption against release on bail, but only those people whose history of offending is such that, either by force of legislation or by court order, they are serious repeat offenders or recidivist young offenders. This bill is about community safety.
I think it may assist the chamber to put on record that the government intends to support the Liberal amendments that go to the sunset clause and the review, but will oppose the other Liberal amendments. It is the government's view that if those other Liberal amendments, apart from the sunset clause and the review, are supported and get up, the bill does not do any of the work that we think it needs to do. So, the government will be voting against the bill in the case that those amendments, apart from the sunset clause and review, are supported.
Bill read a second time.
Committee Stage
In committee.
Clause 1.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN: I appreciate the minister's comments in the second reading summing-up and that the Labor Party has agreed to those two amendments. The Liberal Party has made a decision to amend and push forward with all the amendments and, in this instance, as the lead speaker of the bill, I am bound by those instructions. It is the Liberal Party's view that these amendments are the best option, given a difficult set of circumstances, and that allowing for a child over the age of 16 to be considered a high-risk offender is the appropriate course of action, given what we know about the circumstances.
I reiterate to members of the chamber that we do not know the full set of circumstances. We do not have the benefit of the knowledge that certain members of the government have, and we have to act in accordance with our consciences on the information that we have before us; therefore we will be pursuing the amendments.
Just in relation to one matter, on a personal level, that the Hon. Kyam Maher raised: if I offended him I apologise. I am very passionate about this issue. I have a strong lifelong commitment to rehabilitation and it pains me greatly to see bills like this pass through. I worry that all of us do not have enough public commitment to rehabilitation and to taking the public with us. Perhaps I could have been more temperate.
That said, I understand that whilst technically the amendments are not all consequential, we are going to treat the first clause as a test—
The Hon. K.J. Maher: And divide once, on that first clause.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN: We will divide, yes, and then I understand that we will know where we stand. I move:
Amendment No 1 [McLachlan–1]—
Page 2, line 4—Delete 'Statutes Amendment (Recidivist and Repeat Offenders)' and substitute:
Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) (Young Offenders) Amendment
The Hon. M.C. PARNELL: The Greens will be supporting this amendment. As I have said, we do not like the bill at all, but these amendments make the bill more palatable, so we will be supporting all the Liberal amendments.
The Hon. K.J. MAHER: As indicated in the second reading speech, on all but the sunset and review, the government will be opposing those. I will not go into details except to say that we consider the suite of amendments render what we think the bill needs to do inoperable, so we will be voting against it. I indicate we will be dividing on this first one to establish that but agree that this can be a test clause for the rest of those, save the sunset and review clauses.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN: I acknowledge my agreement to what the Hon. Kyam Maher said.
The Hon. J.A. DARLEY: I indicate that I will not be supporting this amendment.
The committee divided on the amendment:
Ayes 10
Noes 9
Majority 1
AYES | ||
Dawkins, J.S.L. | Franks, T.A. | Lee, J.S. |
Lucas, R.I. | McLachlan, A.L. (teller) | Parnell, M.C. |
Ridgway, D.W. | Stephens, T.J. | Vincent, K.L. |
Wade, S.G. |
NOES | ||
Brokenshire, R.L. | Darley, J.A. | Gago, G.E. |
Hanson, J.E. | Hood, D.G.E. | Hunter, I.K. |
Maher, K.J. (teller) | Malinauskas, P. | Ngo, T.T. |
PAIRS | ||
Lensink, J.M.A. | Gazzola, J.M. |
Amendment thus carried; clause as amended passed.
Clause 2.
The CHAIR: I put that clause 2, being these are all consequential, stand as printed.
Clause negatived.
Clause 3 passed.
Clause 4.
The CHAIR: Amendment No. 3 [McLachlan-1] is seeking to delete clause 4.
Clause negatived.
Clause 5.
The CHAIR: The next amendment is No. 4 [McLachlan-1].
Clause negatived.
Clause 6.
The CHAIR: The next one is amendment No. 5 [McLachlan-1], which is to clause 6.
Clause negatived.
Clause 7.
The CHAIR: Amendment No. 6 [McLachlan-1], clause 7, is to delete, of course.
Clause negatived.
Clause 8.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN: I move:
Amendment No 7 [McLachlan–1]—
Page 4, lines 10 and 11 [clause 8(2), inserted subsection (2)]—
Delete 'a recidivist young offender' and substitute 'of or above the age of 16 years as at the time an application for an extended supervision order is made'
Amendment carried.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN: I move:
Amendment No 8 [McLachlan–1]—
Page 4, after line 12 [clause 8(2)]—After inserted subsection (2) insert:
(3) For the avoidance of doubt, for the purposes of subsection (2) it does not matter how old the youth was at the time of commission of the relevant offences.
(4) However, after 1 July 2019—
(a) the Supreme Court may not make an order under this Act in relation to a youth (despite subsection (2)); and
(b) an extended supervision order made under this Act in relation to a youth in accordance with subsection (2) ceases to be of any force or effect.
Amendment carried; clause as amended passed.
Clause 9 passed.
Clause 10.
The CHAIR: The next amendment is amendment No. 9 [McLachlan-1] to clause 10 to delete the clause.
Clause negatived.
Clause 11.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN: I move:
Amendment No 10 [McLachlan–1]—
Page 5, line 33—Delete 'the relevant offence was' and substitute 'any relevant offences were'
Amendment carried; clause as amended passed.
Clauses 12 to 25 negatived.
New schedule 1.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN: I move:
Amendment No 11 [McLachlan–1]—
Page 5, line 35 to page 12, line 14—Delete Parts 4 and 5 and substitute 'Schedule 1—Review'
1—Review of Act
(1) The Attorney-General must undertake a review of the operation and effectiveness of the amendments effected by this Act.
(2) The review required under this clause must commence not later that 1 January 2019.
(3) The Attorney-General must prepare a report based on the review and must, within 12 sitting days after the report is prepared, cause copies of the report to be laid before each House of Parliament.
New schedule inserted.
Long title.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN: I move:
Amendment No 12 [McLachlan–1]—Long title—
Delete 'Bail Act 1985; the Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Act 2015; the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988; and the Sentencing Act 2017' and substitute 'Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Act 2015'
Amendment carried; long title as amended passed.
Bill reported with amendment.
Third Reading
The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (18:37): I move:
That this bill be now read a third time.
I will make a very quick comment. As I outlined to the chamber before, this bill was about a measure to protect the community. We accept that amendments were carried by this committee. We consider that they render what the bill was supposed to do effectively useless. We do not think the bill, with the amendments that were accepted, would protect the community as we wished. In our view, the bill in its amended form has nothing to do, so we will be voting against the third reading.
The Hon. A.L. McLACHLAN (18:38): I will set out the Liberal Party's position. The Liberal Party will obviously be supporting the third reading of the bill as amended. It is our view that the amendments are measured and would have provided, in the circumstances to the extent that we are aware, an opportunity for appropriate applications to be made in relation to the youth if the passage of this bill went through.
The council divided on the third reading:
Ayes 7
Noes 12
Majority 5
AYES | ||
Dawkins, J.S.L. | Lee, J.S. | Lucas, R.I. |
McLachlan, A.L. (teller) | Ridgway, D.W. | Stephens, T.J. |
Wade, S.G. |
NOES | ||
Brokenshire, R.L. | Darley, J.A. | Franks, T.A. |
Gago, G.E. | Hanson, J.E. | Hood, D.G.E. |
Hunter, I.K. | Maher, K.J. (teller) | Malinauskas, P. |
Ngo, T.T. | Parnell, M.C. | Vincent, K.L. |
PAIRS | ||
Lensink, J.M.A. | Gazzola, J.M. |
Third reading thus negatived.