HANSARD
SITTING CALENDAR
SEARCH
LIVE BROADCAST
Hansard Dynamic Member Index
House of Assembly - Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)
2008-06-05 Daily Xml
Contents
Pdf Xml

CIVIL LIABILITY (FOOD DONORS AND DISTRIBUTORS) AMENDMENT BILL

Introduction and First Reading

The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON (Croydon—Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (16:03): Obtained leave and introduced a bill for an act to amend the Civil Liability Act 1936. Read a first time.

Second Reading

The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON (Croydon—Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (16:03): I move:

That this bill be now read a second time.

The bill aims to encourage food businesses, as well as individuals, to donate safe surplus food to charity. Everyone knows that every day food businesses throw away good food that they have been unable to sell. Although we cannot be certain, the government thinks that an important factor in causing businesses to dispose of food rather than donate it is the fear of legal liability should a consumer suffer ill effects. The government would like to remove that deterrent in the hope of encouraging businesses to choose to donate safe surplus food to the many charities ready to distribute it to those in need.

A similar initiative in Victoria has substantially increased food donations through the organisation One Umbrella. New South Wales has also now provided food donor protection. Accordingly, this bill proposes to give legal protection to food donors, rather like the legal protection we already give to good Samaritans. Our law already says that a good Samaritan who comes to the aid of another in an emergency is not legally liable for any harm as long as the good Samaritan was acting in good faith and without recklessness. I congratulate the member for Davenport on his initiative, which forms part of our law—and long may it do so.

In the same way, this bill would protect a food donor from liability as long as at the time the food was donated the donor neither knew the food to be unsafe nor was reckless about this. Fears have naturally been expressed about the risk of dumping unsafe food on charities as a cheap risk-free alternative to rubbish disposal. The bill guards against that risk in that, if the person knew the food was unsafe or is reckless about its safety, legal liability remains. There is, therefore, a basic obligation on the donor not to donate food that the donor knows or should know is unsafe.

The bill is not a licence to take risks with people's health. The government has consulted the charitable sector through the peak body, the South Australian Council of Social Service (SACOSS), which now supports the bill. The government has agreed to keep the new law under review in light of any evidence that SACOSS or others may gather about the effects of the bill. Accordingly, the bill includes a clause providing for a review after two years. We have also promised that food safety information will be made available to charitable distributors of food so that they can adequately protect the recipients.

I wish to thank the Law Society for its enthusiastic support of the measure. I acknowledge, in particular, the work of the society's New Lawyers Committee, which was instrumental in formulating the proposal and in securing the support of SACOSS. I also acknowledge the support of Restaurant and Catering SA, which indicates that it expects the bill substantially to increase donations by the restaurant and catering trade. I seek leave to have the explanation of clauses inserted in Hansard without my reading it.

Leave granted.

Explanation of Clauses

Part 1—Preliminary

1—Short title

2—Commencement

3—Amendment provisions

These clauses are formal.

Part 2—Amendment of Civil Liability Act 1936

4—Insertion of Part 9 Division 11A

This clause inserts a new Division as follows:

Division 11A—Food donors and distributors

74A—Food donors and distributors

This new section protects a food donor or distributor from civil liability for loss of life or personal injury arising from consumption of food donated or distributed, except if the donor or distributor knew or was recklessly indifferent to the fact that when the food left his or her possession or control it was unsafe within the meaning of the Food Act 2001.

A food donor or distributor is one who, acting without expectation of payment or other consideration and for a charitable or benevolent purpose, donates or distributes food with the intention that the consumer of the food would not have to pay for the food.

The provision requires the Minister to report to Parliament on the operation of the provision over its first 2 years.

Debate adjourned on motion of Hon. I.F. Evans.

PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS
MEMBERS
GET INVOLVED
ABOUT PARLIAMENT
VISIT
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY
CONTACT