Answers to Questions

Eyre Peninsula Grain Growers Rail Fund

In reply to the Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (18 November 2014). (First Session)

The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change): The Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries has received this advice:

Early in 2013, Eyre Peninsula grain growers who contributed to the Fund were invited to participate in a survey regarding possible uses for the surplus. The survey presented three options: upgrades to Eyre Peninsula rail crossings; feasibility of a proposed grain port at Port Spencer and feasibility of a grain barging operation from Lucky Bay. Respondents could also nominate other options for consideration. A locally-based media campaign encouraged contributors to participate in the survey.

More than 180 survey returns were received when the survey closed, on 28 March, 2013. Of those, 166 responses came from grain growers and the analysis was based on those 166 responses. In summary:

The Port Spencer option—with 106 (64 per cent) first preferences—was the most popular.

Thirty five respondents (21 per cent) put forward options of their own.

It was the view of 23 respondents (14 per cent) that the surplus should be used to upgrade rail crossings on the Eyre Peninsula.

Two respondents (1 per cent) felt that the Lucky Bay option would be of most benefit.

$100,000 was subsequently allocated to supporting the development of a multi commodity port generally, leaving the option open for any Eyre Peninsula based multi-commodity port that may proceed, rather than being limited to the Port Spencer option.