<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-03-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="411" />
  <endPage num="456" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000598">
      <heading>Answers to Questions</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Eyre Peninsula Grain Growers Rail Fund</name>
      <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000599">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Eyre Peninsula Grain Growers Rail Fund</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-25">
            <name>Eyre Peninsula Grain Growers Rail Fund</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000600">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="1820">the Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) </by>(18 November 2014).  (First Session)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-25">
            <name>Eyre Peninsula Grain Growers Rail Fund</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000601">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change):</by>  The Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries has received this advice:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000602">
          <inserted>Early in 2013, Eyre Peninsula grain growers who contributed to the Fund were invited to participate in a survey regarding possible uses for the surplus. The survey presented three options: upgrades to Eyre Peninsula rail crossings; feasibility of a proposed grain port at Port Spencer and feasibility of a grain barging operation from Lucky Bay. Respondents could also nominate other options for consideration. A locally-based media campaign encouraged contributors to participate in the survey.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000603">
          <inserted>More than 180 survey returns were received when the survey closed, on 28 March, 2013. Of those, 166 responses came from grain growers and the analysis was based on those 166 responses. In summary:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000604">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>The Port Spencer option—with 106 (64 per cent) first preferences—was the most popular.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000605">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Thirty five respondents (21 per cent) put forward options of their own. </inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000606">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>It was the view of 23 respondents (14 per cent) that the surplus should be used to upgrade rail crossings on the Eyre Peninsula. </inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000607">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Two respondents (1 per cent) felt that the Lucky Bay option would be of most benefit.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20150325ac455ff2f1374d9f90000608">
          <inserted>$100,000 was subsequently allocated to supporting the development of a multi commodity port generally, leaving the option open for any Eyre Peninsula based multi-commodity port that may proceed, rather than being limited to the Port Spencer option.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>