Contents
-
Commencement
-
Bills
-
-
Parliamentary Procedure
-
Bills
-
-
Address in Reply
-
-
Personal Explanation
-
-
Parliamentary Procedure
-
Address in Reply
-
-
Bills
-
-
Petitions
-
-
Answers to Questions
-
-
Ministerial Statement
-
-
Parliamentary Procedure
-
Parliamentary Committees
-
-
Question Time
-
-
Parliamentary Procedure
-
Question Time
-
-
Personal Explanation
-
-
Grievance Debate
-
-
Bills
-
-
Address in Reply
-
-
Parliamentary Committees
-
Parliamentary Procedure
STATE STRATEGIC PLAN
250 Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (13 July 2011) (First Session). With respect to 2011-12 Budget Paper 4—Volume 3, p128, Sub-program 1.2—
If the decrease in 2011-12 Budget is mainly due to $1.4M expenditure in 'community engagement for the Strategic Plan' in 2010-11, why was the 2009-10 actual expenditure higher still?
The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development): I have been advised of the following:
The higher expenditure in 2009-10 when compared with the 2011-12 Budget mainly reflects:
Once off expenditure incurred in 2009-10, including employee termination payments pursuant to budget savings strategies; and
The 2010-11 Budget measure associated with the rationalisation of Cabinet Office.