<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2025-04-30T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8515" />
  <endPage num="8570" />
  <dateModified time="2025-06-05T10:01:50+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true" uid="9ce34ed406294a168b92c11757d587bc">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject uid="de362f7069594795a489f34439201f97">
      <name>SARDI Fish Deaths</name>
      <text id="20250430031bc8c2563741d1b0000045">
        <heading>SARDI Fish Deaths</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" uid="e4781292a6414695ad2c3efdc12a27e1" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-04-30T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>SARDI Fish Deaths</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-04-30T14:29:55+09:30" />
        <text id="20250430031bc8c2563741d1b0000046">
          <timeStamp time="2025-04-30T14:29:55+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" uid="e4781292a6414695ad2c3efdc12a27e1">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI (Leader of the Opposition) (14:29):</by>  My questions are to the Minister for Primary Industries on the investigative report on mortalities of finfish and shellfish hatcheries at the South Australian Aquatic Sciences Centre:</text>
        <text id="20250430031bc8c2563741d1b0000047">1.&amp;#x9;Given the investigative report raises more questions than answers, with key data not being collected, will the minister commit to commissioning an independent and external review separate from SARDI into the government's handling of this incident, including the failure to collect contemporaneous water samples and the overall lack of coordination between government agencies?</text>
        <text id="20250430031bc8c2563741d1b0000048">2.&amp;#x9;Does the minister accept that the failure to collect water samples during the mortality event has fundamentally compromised the investigation's ability to determine the cause, and that this represents a serious procedural shortfall?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" uid="8d530a2533154f90905c72dee79a235e" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-04-30T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>SARDI Fish Deaths</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-04-30T14:30:59+09:30" />
        <text id="20250430031bc8c2563741d1b0000049">
          <timeStamp time="2025-04-30T14:30:59+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" uid="8d530a2533154f90905c72dee79a235e">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (14:30):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. She seems to have failed to appreciate that there has been an independent peer review by Professor Michael Goodsite. That is the first and foremost point to make. In terms of whether water quality samples would have shown the reason, that is a matter for speculation. It is well accepted and acknowledged that had there been water samples, that would have been preferable. I have already outlined the reasons why in the past.</text>
        <text id="20250430031bc8c2563741d1b0000050">There have been many years of operations at West Beach. Water quality hasn't previously been an issue, and therefore it was not part of the protocols to collect those samples until it became clear that it wasn't one of the more expected reasons—namely, biosecurity issues or fish health.</text>
        <text id="20250430031bc8c2563741d1b0000051">The excellent staff at SARDI followed their usual protocols. It is well acknowledged, and acknowledged within the report and by the department, that having additional data such as water samples would of course have been helpful. That has now been addressed so that in the future if there are issues around mortalities of snapper larvae or oyster spat or barramundi broodstock or fingerlings—or, indeed, any other aspects at SARDI—that will be part of it. I think that learning from where there has been a gap and implementing changes is the appropriate outcome.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>