<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2025-04-03T14:15:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8405" />
  <endPage num="8451" />
  <dateModified time="2025-04-04T15:22:19+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true" uid="4c88181913394c65a4e306154011f353">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject uid="8becf6b730894b38909409ae86b9e3cf">
      <name>Vicarious Liability</name>
      <page num="8418" />
      <text id="20250403120fa3bd7adc4671a0000205">
        <heading>Vicarious Liability</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6928" referenceid="c092620e916d44159f200e0e1316c6a8" uid="26360437f22d4202aaade8ef2ba3dbe3" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. L.A. HENDERSON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-04-03T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Vicarious Liability</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-04-03T15:10:41+10:30" />
        <text id="20250403120fa3bd7adc4671a0000206">
          <timeStamp time="2025-04-03T15:10:41+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6928" referenceid="c092620e916d44159f200e0e1316c6a8" uid="26360437f22d4202aaade8ef2ba3dbe3">The Hon. L.A. HENDERSON (15:10):</by>  Thank you, Mr President. My questions are to the Attorney-General:</text>
        <text id="20250403120fa3bd7adc4671a0000207">1.&amp;#x9;Can you please provide an update on the Standing Council of Attorneys-General meeting held in February of this year regarding vicarious liability, stemming from the Bird v DP High Court decision?</text>
        <text id="20250403120fa3bd7adc4671a0000208">2.&amp;#x9;Could you please advise if the government is drafting any legislation in light of these discussions?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" uid="1aa6b437f74942139321f0632c17b62d" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Special Minister of State</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-04-03T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Vicarious Liability</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-04-03T15:11:04+10:30" />
        <text id="20250403120fa3bd7adc4671a0000209">
          <timeStamp time="2025-04-03T15:11:04+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" uid="1aa6b437f74942139321f0632c17b62d">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector, Special Minister of State) (15:11):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. There was a discussion at the last Standing Council of Attorneys-General meeting about the matter that is known as Bird and the implications it has, particularly for the employment-like relationships and therefore the liability of various institutions. A number of jurisdictions, including South Australia, have made changes to their law, to have those employment-like relationships come in under, so there is that liability for institutions that have people in employment-like relationships</text>
        <text id="20250403120fa3bd7adc4671a0000210">All of the jurisdictions that have made changes have made it prospective, not retrospective, which it would need to be to influence things like what happened in the case of Bird. The royal commission into institutional sexual abuse made recommendations that jurisdictions should introduce such laws to make that law change. It also was very clear that it ought not be retrospective, but that is something that was discussed and further work is to be done and reported back at further meetings of the Standing Council of Attorneys-General.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>