<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2025-04-02T14:15:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8357" />
  <endPage num="8403" />
  <dateModified time="2025-04-09T16:10:19+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true" uid="015eb549319a4fc4abb41ba717151e82">
    <name>Matters of Interest</name>
    <subject uid="a7ef2b1e13de4d7a8552a1acc7f2267c">
      <name>Regional South Australia</name>
      <text id="2025040222e55c1ddee547e290000294">
        <heading>Regional South Australia</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" uid="b3571677c75244c4bb138311b52ffaea" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2025-04-02T15:35:49+10:30" />
        <page num="8375" />
        <text id="2025040222e55c1ddee547e290000295">
          <timeStamp time="2025-04-02T15:35:49+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" uid="b3571677c75244c4bb138311b52ffaea">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI (Leader of the Opposition) (15:35):</by>  Why is it that when people talk about resilience, they appear to only speak about the regions? How did we get here? Yes, regional communities are famously resilient; it is a badge of honour for many of us, and rightly so, but why is it that regions are constantly asked to demonstrate this resilience at a level far beyond what is expected of metropolitan areas? Why is it acceptable for rural towns to endure substandard infrastructure, limited services and economic neglect while Adelaide thrives with the advantages of constant investment and development?</text>
        <text id="2025040222e55c1ddee547e290000296">Distance is the reality of regional life, no-one disputes that. Not every town can or should have every service available; however, every region deserves access to a reasonable standard of essential services. For too long this has been treated as an unattainable luxury rather than the basic right of the people who keep this state's agriculture and resource sectors alive.</text>
        <text id="2025040222e55c1ddee547e290000297">Take health care, for example. I was shocked to discover that Mount Gambier hospital does not have ICU beds. How is it that the second largest city in our state, which happens to be in regional South Australia, cannot support its own critically ill patients? Furthermore, the absence of general practitioners in rural areas is not just inconvenient, it is a threat to public health. The same can be said for aged care and mental health services, essentials that underpin a community's well being.</text>
        <text id="2025040222e55c1ddee547e290000298">What about schools? Time and time again, regional families are expected to settle for underfunded and understaffed schools with fewer resources than their urban counterparts. Then there is the shrinking presence of banks in country towns, leaving residents and businesses struggling to manage their finances, and for those families wanting to access childcare the wait lists are often endless. Supermarkets, when they exist, often carry fewer choices at higher prices, a bitter irony for communities surrounded by farmland that feeds the state. Even something as simple as maintaining quality roads can seem out of reach in regional South Australia, as patchwork fixes and neglect leave residents wondering why taxes do not stretch beyond Adelaide city limits.</text>
        <text id="2025040222e55c1ddee547e290000299">What I find especially frustrating is the sense of being overlooked, even as we know that, without a doubt, regional South Australia provides so much for this state. From the paddocks of Eyre Peninsula to the vineyards of the Coonawarra, regional communities drive economic output in ways that Adelaide relies on but rarely acknowledges, yet time and time again they are last in line for investment, development and opportunities to grow.</text>
        <text id="2025040222e55c1ddee547e290000300">It is not just about fairness; it is well past time to call for regional equity, because it is about sustaining these communities for future generations. It is about futureproofing our food and fibre security, it is about galvanising over 50 per cent of this state's export product, it is about ensuring the bulk of our economy continues to tick over. If schools, health care and infrastructure continue to fall short, regional areas will not just lose people, they will lose the vibrant social fabric that makes them worth living in. Families will move closer to the city in search of better prospects, draining the countryside of its lifeblood. Without policy intervention to address these inequities, the regions risk being left to wither.</text>
        <text id="2025040222e55c1ddee547e290000301">Yes, regional South Australians are tough, but why should we always have to be? Why should resilience be treated as an excuse for neglect and why does regional South Australia always seem to miss out? It does not have to be this way. Regional equality means recognising that these communities deserve investment and opportunity commensurate with their contributions to the state. It means ensuring every region has access to good schools, reliable health care, essential services and the infrastructure to not just survive but to thrive. It is about valuing the regions not just as an afterthought but as an integral part of South Australia's future. Our regional towns deserve more than admiration for their resilience, they deserve the respect of meaningful support and let's make sure they get it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>