Legislative Council Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1) 55 1 Parliament of South Australia Legislative Council published Question Time Environment and Food Production Areas Environment and Food Production Areas The Hon. R.A. SIMMS Legislative Council Environment and Food Production Areas The Hon. R.A. SIMMS (15:15): I seek leave to make a brief explanation before addressing a question without notice to the Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development on the topic of food production areas. Leave granted. The Hon. R.A. SIMMS Legislative Council The Hon. R.A. SIMMS: On Monday, the Malinauskas government announced their plans to allow agricultural land to be developed by amending the environment and food production area. Yesterday in question time the Minister for Regional Development stated that only 1 per cent of the Greater Adelaide food production area would be impacted by the government's plan. It has been noted, however, that some of the land is South Australia's prime agricultural land. According to PIRSA data, primary industries and agribusiness contributed $7.78 billion to South Australia's gross state product and supported 78,000 jobs in 2022-23. The field crop sector represents 42 per cent of total state revenue for the year. My questions to the Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, therefore, are: 1.	Can the minister indicate what a 1 per cent loss of prime food production land in Greater Adelaide would mean in dollar terms? 2.	What impact would this have on the state's gross state product? 3.	What would be the total impact over the 30 years of the Greater Adelaide Regional Plan? The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN Legislative Council Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development Minister for Forest Industries The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (15:16): I thank the honourable member for his question. I think it is important, again, to reiterate the need to get a balance between addressing the very significant housing crisis that we currently have and the number of people who are unable to find housing or affordable housing and the production of our vital food supply. They are areas that can work together that can be complementary; notwithstanding, there are obviously tensions when we are looking at the usage of land. However, I think the fact that it is less than 1 per cent of the agricultural land within the Greater Adelaide area is significant in that it is an opportunity to increase housing supply very significantly, and it is an opportunity to work closely with primary industries around how best to manage those, working closely together, side by side. It is also important to emphasise that whilst the Greater Adelaide plan and the proposals before parliament will enable that land to change—that less than 1 per cent—there is still a lot to go through. There needs to be the code amendments and the other processes that are an important and essential part of any changes, and of course no-one will be forced to sell their land. Farmers won't be required to sell their land. So in terms of the impact, until we know which landowners will take up the opportunity to have their land changed in use and sold, we can't guess at what the impacts in terms of value will be.