<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-09-26T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6671" />
  <endPage num="6731" />
  <dateModified time="2024-09-27T16:25:44+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus</name>
      <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000061">
        <heading>Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-09-26T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-09-26T14:25:50+09:30" />
        <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000062">
          <timeStamp time="2024-09-26T14:25:50+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI (Leader of the Opposition) (14:25):</by>  I suspect they are writing that advertisement pretty quickly. I seek leave to make a brief explanation prior to addressing questions to the Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development regarding South Australia's horticultural sector.</text>
        <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000063">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000064">
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI:</by>  The opposition understands that vegetable producer Perfection Fresh Australia has written to the minister and her department outlining their serious concerns and frustrations in the processes and procedures relating to their management of the biosecurity incursion regarding tomato brown rugose virus. Despite their own thorough management and internal quarantine procedures, the blanket orders placed upon their business have been described as 'wholly unworkable'. They feel it equates to their business having zero options, other than to shut down and dismiss staff. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000065">1.&amp;#x9;Is the minister satisfied that Perfection Fresh Australia and other South Australian businesses affected by the tomato brown rugose fruit virus have been afforded procedural fairness regarding all offers made by the Malinauskas Labor government on 23 September 2024?</text>
        <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000066">2.&amp;#x9;Did the minister and her department, however it may be currently staffed, consider any potential alternative measures before making orders pursuant to the Plant Health Act on 23 September 2024?</text>
        <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000067">3.&amp;#x9;Given how contagious this virus is, does the minister anticipate any further orders pursuant to the Plant Health Act to be delivered to South Australian horticultural businesses in the coming days and weeks?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-09-26T14:27:23+09:30" />
        <page num="6674" />
        <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000068">
          <timeStamp time="2024-09-26T14:27:23+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (14:27):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. Quarantine orders on businesses are not put in place lightly. PIRSA has been in close communication with the businesses, obviously. There have been over 2,900 tests and samples in regard to this virus. In terms of the alternatives, there are a couple of alternatives, which I have outlined already in this place this week. I would be interested to know which of them those opposite are advocating for.</text>
        <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000069">One of the alternatives would be to lift the quarantine restrictions. The outcome of that would be that other South Australian growers would be restricted from selling their tomato fruit interstate. So likely every other jurisdiction would put up the walls to South Australian tomatoes. The impacts of that on other South Australian growers and their workforces would be absolutely significant. If that is what the opposition is advocating, they should come out and say so.</text>
        <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000070">In terms of whether future orders could be put in place, the important thing here is that we are relying on the evidence that is to hand. Currently, the sampling and testing has shown that this disease is limited to three businesses here in South Australia. It has not spread, according to the evidence—there are no detections at other premises.</text>
        <text id="20240926ae6ed33e01ef493d80000071">Some of that evidence is still coming in, but that is where we are at the moment. Therefore, the most responsible thing to do, notwithstanding the difficulties and challenges faced by the three affected businesses, for the South Australian industry and for the Australian industry is to have the quarantine orders in place. They haven't been done lightly, they have been done with the livelihoods and businesses of the rest of South Australia in mind. If those opposite think that they should be lifted and we should let it rip with all the subsequent impacts on other growers and their workers, why don't they say so?</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>