<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-09-24T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6485" />
  <endPage num="6562" />
  <dateModified time="2024-09-27T16:44:03+09:30" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000078">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Horticultural Food Safety Regulations</name>
      <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000079">
        <heading>Horticultural Food Safety Regulations</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-09-24T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Horticultural Food Safety Regulations</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-09-24T14:31:09+09:30" />
        <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000080">
          <timeStamp time="2024-09-24T14:31:09+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI (Leader of the Opposition) (14:31):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation prior to addressing a question to the Minister for Primary Industries about melons, berries and leafy vegetables.</text>
        <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000081">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000082">
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI:</by>  I have been in conversations with the growers and stakeholders of the commercial horticultural sector, who are alarmed by a horticultural food safety regulations discussion paper. Despite being told multiple times during the consultation stage that an additional fee, dubbed a 'lettuce tax', for food safety certification of melons, berries and assorted leafy vegetables was unfair, unworkable and unnecessary, the Department of Primary Industries has still gone ahead with presenting the exact fees and regulations that industry advised not to introduce. My questions to the Minister for Primary Industries are:</text>
        <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000083">1.&amp;#x9;Does the minister concede that this new fee does nothing to improve food safety standards for already regulated and certified growers?</text>
        <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000084">2.&amp;#x9;Does the minister concede that this is yet another tax on farmers that will directly impact on the cost of fresh produce for South Australians?</text>
        <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000085">3.&amp;#x9;Will the minister commit, on the record, to not following through with the discussion paper and commit to not implementing a new food safety certification fee for those regulated growers who already paid for, and have obtained, a food safety certificate?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-09-24T14:32:37+09:30" />
        <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000086">
          <timeStamp time="2024-09-24T14:32:37+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (14:32):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. First, a little bit of background: this is about food safety, and I would imagine that most consumers would expect that when they buy berries, leafy vegetables and melons they are already subject to food safety requirements, and would be surprised to hear that that has not necessarily been the case until now. There are new national standards under the national Food Standards Code for these, and the task now is to work out how we can best apply them here in South Australia. The discussion paper that has been released refers to possible options, and it asks industry for feedback and to suggest any other options. It does not propose a new tax.</text>
        <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000087">I am advised that there has been an increase in the number of incidents involving foodborne disease, including horticulture, with horticulture accounting for nearly 10 per cent of all recalls. When recalls occur it obviously puts additional pressure on producers and growers. We don't want to see food recalls because it indicates that there is something that has broken down in terms of the chain. I think the public is keen to have confidence that their food is safe from disease.</text>
        <text id="202409242fb0afeb32e94f6e80000088">A discussion paper, it may surprise those opposite to know, is for discussion. That is why it's called a discussion paper. It puts forward options and it invites other options. Feedback is open until the middle of October. I look forward to getting a briefing from the department on what that feedback is.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>