<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-09-10T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6289" />
  <endPage num="6341" />
  <dateModified time="2024-09-11T16:04:21+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20240910c4c16a1ad73b441ba0000277">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" referenceid="93519aefc9814df9a5e20a43c35e142f" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-09-10T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-09-10T15:21:34+09:30" />
        <text id="20240910c4c16a1ad73b441ba0000278">
          <timeStamp time="2024-09-10T15:21:34+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4363" referenceid="93519aefc9814df9a5e20a43c35e142f">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (15:21):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before addressing a question to the Attorney-General on the topic of the implementation of coronial recommendations relating to child protection.</text>
        <text id="20240910c4c16a1ad73b441ba0000279">Leave granted. </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" referenceid="93519aefc9814df9a5e20a43c35e142f" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20240910c4c16a1ad73b441ba0000280">
          <by role="member" id="4363" referenceid="93519aefc9814df9a5e20a43c35e142f">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  After the murder of Amber Rose Rigney and her brother Korey Lee Mitchell in 2016, a coronial inquest was undertaken. In the judgement the Coroner said:</text>
        <text id="20240910c4c16a1ad73b441ba0000281">
          <inserted>What this inquest has highlighted, however, is the folly of governments ignoring coronial and other recommendations. I speak again of course of the continuation of unlawful practices within the child protection authority despite coronial findings in the Valentine and Napier inquests that identified those practices.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20240910c4c16a1ad73b441ba0000282">The Coroner then went on to discuss the issue in this inquest, that issue being the death of those two children, which was quoted as the 'non-adherence to statutory obligations imposed on the child protection authority due to alleged resource deficiencies'.</text>
        <text id="20240910c4c16a1ad73b441ba0000283">The Trust in Culture report, led by Kate Alexander, was created as a result of that inquest, and looked into government's progress in implementing recommendations from previous child protection coronial inquests. This report found that the government needed to develop an 'urgent strategy' to ensure that the system functioned effectively.</text>
        <text id="20240910c4c16a1ad73b441ba0000284">My question is: what are the ongoing steps that have been taken to ensure that recommendations made in coronial inquests are implemented and maintained in child protection?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-09-10T15:23:07+09:30" />
        <page num="6305" />
        <text id="20240910c4c16a1ad73b441ba0000285">
          <timeStamp time="2024-09-10T15:23:07+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:23):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. I note there are reports tabled to the parliament in relation to actions that have been taken by ministers in relation to coronial inquests. If there are specific areas of this inquest I would be more than happy to seek answers from the minister responsible in the child protection area and bring back a reply for the honourable member, whether by way of a supplementary question or outside the question time process.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>