<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-09-10T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6289" />
  <endPage num="6341" />
  <dateModified time="2024-09-11T16:03:58+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Collins Class Submarines</name>
      <text id="2024091077793a1ce5b24b9cb0000186">
        <heading>Collins Class Submarines</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" referenceid="1df522b2c3094a7386fc17e1fb16d162" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-09-10T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Collins Class Submarines</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-09-10T14:59:06+09:30" />
        <text id="2024091077793a1ce5b24b9cb0000187">
          <timeStamp time="2024-09-10T14:59:06+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="2742" referenceid="1df522b2c3094a7386fc17e1fb16d162">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:59):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before directing a question to the Attorney-General about Collins class submarines.</text>
        <text id="2024091077793a1ce5b24b9cb0000188">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" referenceid="1df522b2c3094a7386fc17e1fb16d162" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2024091077793a1ce5b24b9cb0000189">
          <by role="member" id="2742" referenceid="1df522b2c3094a7386fc17e1fb16d162">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  On 26 July, <term>The Advertiser</term> reported that the four-year sustainment contract for the Adelaide-built fleet of six Collins submarines confirms Osborne Naval Shipyard as the home of the lucrative full-cycle dockings, which take two years to complete. My question to the Attorney is: does the Attorney believe that industrial action taken by workers at ASC will have any impact on the $2.2 billion deal for the ASC to sustain the Collins class submarines?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-09-10T14:59:51+09:30" />
        <page num="6299" />
        <text id="2024091077793a1ce5b24b9cb0000190">
          <timeStamp time="2024-09-10T14:59:51+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (14:59):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. My answer is I think it's unlikely. We do see some level of industrial discussion, disputation and action here in South Australia but, as I have said in this chamber before, we have had a relatively harmonious industrial relations field in South Australia for quite some time. Of course there will be disagreements and disputes that occur from time to time, but I'm not aware of anything that would suggest that any actions or any disputes that may be occurring at the moment will have any substantial effect on any defence project in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="2024091077793a1ce5b24b9cb0000191">While I am on my feet, I might just clarify an answer I gave to the honourable Leader of the Opposition in relation to Incolink. I have been informed that John Setka, who was formerly the Victorian secretary of the CFMEU, and formerly a board member of Incolink, has stepped down from that role in Victoria.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>