<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-08-27T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5997" />
  <endPage num="6054" />
  <dateModified time="2025-03-18T16:52:41+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>CFMEU</name>
      <text id="20240827e4cfbdc1775241d780000346">
        <heading>CFMEU</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" referenceid="e7b583be01404e74b438589370882e1d" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-08-27T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>CFMEU</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-08-27T15:07:20+09:30" />
        <text id="20240827e4cfbdc1775241d780000347">
          <timeStamp time="2024-08-27T15:07:20+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5418" referenceid="e7b583be01404e74b438589370882e1d">The Hon. C. BONAROS (15:07):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General and industrial relations minister. Can the Attorney, in his capacity as Attorney and industrial relations minister, confirm the government's publicly declared position that there has been no evidence of bikie involvement in local construction projects, that the minister responsible has acknowledged the government has not been alerted to any wrongdoing of unethical practices here in SA by the CFMEU, and does the Attorney acknowledge that any investigation instigated by this government needs to be systemic and include all players in the building and construction industry, not just the CFMEU?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-08-27T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>CFMEU</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-08-27T15:08:16+09:30" />
        <text id="20240827e4cfbdc1775241d780000348">
          <timeStamp time="2024-08-27T15:08:16+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:08):</by>  As I said in answer to a previous question, I think a supplementary from the honourable member, the construction and general division of the CFMEU in South Australia had been run and administered out of Victoria. What many people saw on I think it was the <term>60 Minutes</term> program and related reports in other papers were shocking scenes of some of the behaviour of people from that Victorian union, which effectively then controlled the South Australian union.</text>
        <text id="20240827e4cfbdc1775241d780000349">So, as I have answered here, I support the federal government legislation, and I and this government support the Attorney-General's decision to place the general and construction division in Victoria and, consequently, in South Australia, where it is being administered out of Victoria and New South Wales, into administration.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>