<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-08-27T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5997" />
  <endPage num="6054" />
  <dateModified time="2025-03-18T16:52:29+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Deepfake Images</name>
      <text id="202408273f4863ccf3604669b0000310">
        <heading>Deepfake Images</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6929" referenceid="53ca1cd2e19847a59766892bec169fa3" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.L. GAME</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-08-27T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Deepfake Images</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-08-27T14:59:10+09:30" />
        <text id="202408273f4863ccf3604669b0000311">
          <timeStamp time="2024-08-27T14:59:10+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6929" referenceid="53ca1cd2e19847a59766892bec169fa3">The Hon. S.L. GAME (14:59):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before addressing a question to the Attorney-General regarding the recent Tickle v Giggle case interstate.</text>
        <text id="202408273f4863ccf3604669b0000312">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6929" referenceid="53ca1cd2e19847a59766892bec169fa3" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.L. GAME</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202408273f4863ccf3604669b0000313">
          <by role="member" id="6929" referenceid="53ca1cd2e19847a59766892bec169fa3">The Hon. S.L. GAME:</by>  I was pleased recently to hear the state government's intention to better protect South Australia's girls and young women by criminalising the creation and distribution of AI-created sexually explicit deepfake images. The recent outcome of the Tickle v Giggle case interstate found in favour of a New South Wales man who was banned from the women-only app known as Giggle for Girls. Mr Tickle, or Roxanne as he prefers to be called, was awarded $10,000 in compensation, plus costs, because he could not join a female-only group.</text>
        <text id="202408273f4863ccf3604669b0000314">The apps creator, Sall Grover, aimed to create a safe space for women. The interstate ruling could have long-term and widespread negative repercussions in the workplace. In light of the Tickle v Giggle case, my question to the Attorney-General is: given the move to better protect girls and women by changing the state's AI laws, will the Malinauskas government also act to protect South Australian females from biological men who try to access women-only apps and, if so, what steps will the Malinauskas government do to that end?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-08-27T15:00:43+09:30" />
        <text id="202408273f4863ccf3604669b0000315">
          <timeStamp time="2024-08-27T15:00:43+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:00):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. I am not aware of the matter she refers to, but certainly this government has no intention of engaging in a culture war in relation to gender identity.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>