<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-06-06T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5821" />
  <endPage num="5839" />
  <dateModified time="2024-06-07T15:11:11+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Age of Consent</name>
      <text id="20240606deba35b34a774636b0000162">
        <heading>Age of Consent</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" referenceid="5c423631416444aeb0c7e273b130ee55" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-06-06T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Age of Consent</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-06-06T14:54:05+09:30" />
        <text id="20240606deba35b34a774636b0000163">
          <timeStamp time="2024-06-06T14:54:05+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="3126" referenceid="5c423631416444aeb0c7e273b130ee55">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (14:54):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Attorney-General regarding the age of consent in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="20240606deba35b34a774636b0000164">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" referenceid="5c423631416444aeb0c7e273b130ee55" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20240606deba35b34a774636b0000165">
          <by role="member" id="3126" referenceid="5c423631416444aeb0c7e273b130ee55">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD:</by>  It has recently been reported that a South Australian woman known as Jenna, who was allegedly groomed by a former teacher, has approached the Attorney-General calling for changes to our state's consent laws. Jenna has told <term>The Advertiser</term> that years after her former teacher groomed her at the age of 17, she reported the incident but no charges could be laid as the alleged predator was no longer teaching at the school she was attending when the offence is said to have occurred.</text>
        <text id="20240606deba35b34a774636b0000166">In response to Jenna's correspondence raising her concerns, the Attorney-General conceded that under a 'strict interpretation' of the law, the conduct of sexual activity between a teacher and a former student who is 17 years of age may not be captured by the current provisions. The Attorney-General further stated:</text>
        <text id="20240606deba35b34a774636b0000167">
          <inserted>Noting the concerns you have raised, I have instructed my department to consider this issue further as part of the review (of consent laws).</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20240606deba35b34a774636b0000168">My question to the Attorney-General is: given the consultation on the state government's review of consent laws in South Australia closed on 12 February this year, what progress has the government made on fixing this loophole, and when can we expect to see something before the parliament?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-06-06T14:55:31+09:30" />
        <text id="20240606deba35b34a774636b0000169">
          <timeStamp time="2024-06-06T14:55:31+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (14:55):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. He is quite right that we have had a review into a number of issues that relate to laws of consent in South Australia. That has now closed. All the submissions are being assessed. I know that within my department, work has already started on the policy work as a result of those submissions. I would expect there would be more that I can say about any changes probably sometime later this year.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>