<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-05-15T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5605" />
  <endPage num="5656" />
  <dateModified time="2024-06-04T16:43:11+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Food Production</name>
      <text id="20240515eb251abf7a53410380000135">
        <heading>Food Production</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-05-15T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Food Production</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-05-15T14:46:30+09:30" />
        <text id="20240515eb251abf7a53410380000136">
          <timeStamp time="2024-05-15T14:46:30+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI (Leader of the Opposition) (14:46):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development on the topic of food production.</text>
        <text id="20240515eb251abf7a53410380000137">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20240515eb251abf7a53410380000138">
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI:</by>  Over the past 18 months, we have seen policy decisions from both our state and federal Labor governments that have attacked our food producers here in South Australia. The federal government's industrial relations laws are a handbrake on all businesses, and agricultural businesses are by no means exempt, adding layers of complexity and creating disincentives to employ. The biosecurity levy is a tax on farmers and food producers.</text>
        <text id="20240515eb251abf7a53410380000139">The decision of the Minister for Primary Industries and the Minister for Environment and Water in this state to support mass buybacks of water out of the consumptive pool over water efficiency projects has prompted outrage and comments from South Australian food producers, such as Ben Haslett, who has said that removing that water removes the power to produce.</text>
        <text id="20240515eb251abf7a53410380000140">The lack of leadership by the minister on her government's own mandated sheep and goat eID rollout has left producers in the dark with regard to future investment and now we see the banning of live sheep exports, an industry worth $143 million a year to our nation, which will have flow-on effects to the sheep industry here in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="20240515eb251abf7a53410380000141">So my question to the Minister for Primary Industries is: will the minister pull her support for these policies and condemn the actions of the federal government which continues to attack food producers here in South Australia and, if not, why not?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-05-15T14:48:05+09:30" />
        <text id="20240515eb251abf7a53410380000142">
          <timeStamp time="2024-05-15T14:48:05+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (14:48):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. Only two of the items that she mentioned refer to the state government and one of those is obviously a federal government initiative, being the water buybacks.</text>
        <page num="5613" />
        <text id="20240515eb251abf7a53410380000143">In terms of the water buybacks, as I have said in this place on previous occasions I believe, there is work being undertaken in terms of providing a business case to the federal government about how those can most effectively be structured so that they provide a good outcome not only for the environment but also for areas such as the Riverland and for primary production.</text>
        <text id="20240515eb251abf7a53410380000144">In terms of eID, the improvement in traceability is incredibly important for primary producers because of the increased threats of diseases, such as foot-and-mouth disease and others, that are close to our shores, although fortunately not currently within Australia. It is so important. Indeed, if those sorts of diseases got in, they would potentially destroy many of our primary production activities. That is continuing to roll out. We are working closely with industry, and the dates that have been originally announced for the first stage of implementation on 1 January next year, and then the second stage on 1 January 2027, are still on course.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>