<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-05-01T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5429" />
  <endPage num="5517" />
  <dateModified time="2024-05-03T11:20:17+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Parliamentary Committees</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Social Development Committee: Amendments to the National Health and Medical Research Council Ethical Guidelines on the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Clinical Practice and Research</name>
      <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000683">
        <heading>Social Development Committee: Amendments to the National Health and Medical Research Council Ethical Guidelines on the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Clinical Practice and Research</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" referenceid="c8a0c3187b2e476d8defa1809fecdf53" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2024-05-01T19:51:56+09:30" />
        <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000684">
          <timeStamp time="2024-05-01T19:51:56+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="3122" referenceid="c8a0c3187b2e476d8defa1809fecdf53">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (19:51):</by>  I move:</text>
        <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000685">
          <inserted>That the final report of the committee, entitled Amendments to the National Health and Medical Research Council Ethical Guidelines on the use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Clinical Practice and Research, be noted.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000686">The Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2003 and the Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction Act 2003 provide the legislative framework in South Australia for the use of human embryos in clinical trials and research.</text>
        <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000687">The National Health and Medical Research Council and the National Health and Medical Research Council Embryo Research Licensing Committee are responsible for administering the commonwealth legislative framework through the commonwealth RIHE Act 2002 and the commonwealth PHCR Act 2002.</text>
        <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000688">The NHMRC's ethical guidelines on the use of assisted reproductive technology in clinical practice and research provides a standard for ethical conduct in assisted reproductive technologies, research and clinical trials.</text>
        <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000689">Section 30 of the South Australian RIHE Act requires that any amendments to the ethical guidelines must first be referred to the Social Development Committee. The committee must undertake an inquiry on any changes to the ethical guidelines and table a report in both houses of the Parliament of South Australia before any relevant amendments to the RIHE Act may be given effect to.</text>
        <page num="5476" />
        <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000690">The committee received notification of amendments to the ethical guidelines following the passing of the commonwealth Mitochondrial Donation Law Reform (Maeve's Law) Act 2022. The revisions deal with mitochondrial donation in ART procedures along with several administrative amendments. The new ethical guidelines were tabled in the Australian parliament in May 2023. The Social Development Committee is satisfied, based on the evidence presented by the NHMRC and the Department for Health and Wellbeing, that the Australian government has appropriately consulted with the South Australian government and South Australian stakeholders on those amendments.</text>
        <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000691">The committee notes that the requirement for amendments to the ethical guidelines to be referred to the parliamentary standing committee is unique in the country to South Australia. No other state or territory is required by their own legislation to undertake such an inquiry.</text>
        <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000692">The committee considers that in 2003, when the RIHE Act and the PHCR Act were enacted, there was motivation for extra scrutiny to be had on the ethical guidelines and any proposed revisions to them. In 2023, the committee believed there was limited merit for the requirement under the RIHE Act for the committee to review any proposed amendments to the ethical guidelines and there is generally a more widespread acceptance of ART in society.</text>
        <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000693">The committee believes that the degree of scrutiny is sufficient where the ethical guidelines must first be referred by the commonwealth to the Minister for Health and Wellbeing and the Parliament of South Australia with no further requirement for scrutiny by the standing committee. As a result of this inquiry, the committee has made a recommendation to the government of South Australia, through the Minister for Human Services, of section 30(3) of the RIHE Act be repealed to remove the requirement of the Social Development Committee to inquire into and report on any changes to the ethical guidelines. I commend the committee's report to the house.</text>
        <text id="202405010d723b576bc5455780000694">Debate adjourned on motion of Hon. B.R. Hood.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>