<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-04-09T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5237" />
  <endPage num="5278" />
  <dateModified time="2024-04-12T11:23:06+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Wine Grapegrowers</name>
      <text id="20240409e88edf5aaed64527a0000311">
        <heading>Wine Grapegrowers</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-04-09T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Wine Grapegrowers</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-04-09T15:45:45+09:30" />
        <text id="20240409e88edf5aaed64527a0000312">
          <timeStamp time="2024-04-09T15:45:45+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI (Leader of the Opposition) (15:45):</by>  Supplementary: is the minister seriously considering the request by Riverland Wine in their synopsis for assistance for growers to diversify crops, and when can the industry expect a response to that synopsis by the minister?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-04-09T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Wine Grapegrowers</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-04-09T15:46:04+09:30" />
        <text id="20240409e88edf5aaed64527a0000313">
          <timeStamp time="2024-04-09T15:46:04+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (15:46):</by>  In terms of more general structural reform, that is clearly something that needs to be addressed and is being considered by the national working group. As I have mentioned before, we need to ensure that any type of initiative isn't counterproductive because it is undermined, perhaps by accident, by an adjoining jurisdiction. The issues are many, and that working group is working on them.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>