<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-03-21T14:15:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5187" />
  <endPage num="5235" />
  <dateModified time="2024-03-22T15:25:00+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Drug-Driving Laws</name>
      <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000068">
        <heading>Drug-Driving Laws</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4362" referenceid="9196416ed01f41d0801ce030b03cd39a" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.S. LEE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-03-21T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Drug-Driving Laws</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-03-21T14:32:01+10:30" />
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000069">
          <timeStamp time="2024-03-21T14:32:01+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4362" referenceid="9196416ed01f41d0801ce030b03cd39a">The Hon. J.S. LEE (Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:32):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before directing a question to the Attorney-General about drug-driving offences.</text>
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000070">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4362" referenceid="9196416ed01f41d0801ce030b03cd39a" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.S. LEE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <page num="5191" />
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000071">
          <by role="member" id="4362" referenceid="9196416ed01f41d0801ce030b03cd39a">The Hon. J.S. LEE:</by>  ABC News reported on 13 March that a driver in South Australia instantly lost his driver's licence following a false positive during a roadside drug test. This was followed by a three-month loss of licence despite official follow-up laboratory results revealing that he was not driving under the influence of drugs. The driver's mother was quoted as saying:</text>
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000072">
          <inserted>The implication of losing his job as a property manager because he can't drive for three months, the stress level is absolutely beyond…</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000073">In a comparison with other jurisdictions, the ABC reported that:</text>
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000074">
          <inserted>Drivers in New South Wales who test positive to an initial mobile drug test will be directed to provide a saliva sample, which if it returns positive, will result in a 24-hour loss of licence, according to the Centre of Road Safety.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000075">
          <inserted>In Victoria and Queensland, drivers who return a positive result to an initial test will be required to take a second test which, if positive, will be sent to a laboratory for further analysis…</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000076">
          <inserted>ACT Policing said drivers can only be charged with a drug driving offence if they test positive on a saliva test analysed in a laboratory.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000077">
          <inserted>However, in South Australia officers can issue an immediate loss of licence to a driver…by testing positive to a roadside drug test following laws introduced into that state in February last year…</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000078">My questions to the Attorney-General are:</text>
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000079">1.&amp;#x9;Will the Attorney-General commit to review the fairness of such an offence to ensure that false positive roadside tests will not impact or impose hardship on South Australian drivers?</text>
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000080">2.&amp;#x9;What measures or amendments would the Attorney-General consider to align with other states and territory jurisdictions in only suspending driver's licences upon secondary laboratory tests?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-03-21T14:34:30+10:30" />
        <text id="20240321ece16c9188084a6f80000081">
          <timeStamp time="2024-03-21T14:34:30+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (14:34):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. I am happy to report that I know that the Minister for Police, who has responsibility for this, has been looking into this. My understanding is that the disqualification referred to by the honourable member has been cancelled and police are looking at their procedures, as I understand it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>