<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-02-21T14:15:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4813" />
  <endPage num="4863" />
  <dateModified time="2024-02-22T15:05:11+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Footrot</name>
      <page num="4815" />
      <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000038">
        <heading>Footrot</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-02-21T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Footrot</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-02-21T14:26:05+10:30" />
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000039">
          <timeStamp time="2024-02-21T14:26:05+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI (Leader of the Opposition) (14:26):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before addressing a question to the Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development on the topic of footrot in the South-East sheep saleyards.</text>
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000040">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000041">
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI:</by>  According to an official notice by PIRSA regarding the South-East sheep saleyards, in order to address the reduction in the number of sheep consignments through Naracoorte and Mount Gambier saleyards for the 2023-24 selling season it was proposed, and I quote from the government's own official notice:</text>
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000042">
          <inserted>…weekly markets at these saleyards become sales for terminal stock and that this reduced risk would, in turn, reduce the requirement for intensive surveillance by PIRSA inspectors whilst a more broader external review into the Footrot program was carried out.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000043">On the Livestock SA website it states that: </text>
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000044">
          <inserted>A final report from the broader external review into the Footrot program is expected to be provided to the State Government and Livestock SA in early 2024.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000045">Since the change in policy, the Mount Gambier saleyards have seen more throughput of sheep in the last six months, up until 30 January, than they did for the entire 2022-23 financial year. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000046">1.&amp;#x9;Given the obvious improvements in throughput in the saleyards in Mount Gambier and Naracoorte over the last six months, and the reduced risk of footrot spread with terminal stock, are these saleyards still under that same agreement and, if not, why not?</text>
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000047">2.&amp;#x9;Given the minister has not yet received the final report of the external review into the footrot program, is the government still on track to have any proposed new statewide footrot management programs emerging from that report's finding to be in place by 1 July 2024?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-02-21T14:28:16+10:30" />
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000048">
          <timeStamp time="2024-02-21T14:28:16+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (14:28):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. In answer to her first question, yes, that agreement is still in place. Final consultation on the proposed changes to surveillance occurred back in late July last year, and the changes were implemented from 15 August 2023.</text>
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000049">The Livestock SA board at that time provided their support for the interim changes to be trialled at the South-East saleyards while the full review of the program was undertaken. In regard to that review, Livestock SA was provided with $30,000 funding from PIRSA to co-contribute to the review, that was industry funded and led, of the SA footrot program.</text>
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000050">As I think I mentioned in answer to the previous question, and frankly was alluded to in this question by the honourable member, the review outcomes will be considered by industry and PIRSA in early 2024 and will guide industry funding of the SA footrot program and what it might look like for the 2024-25 financial year.</text>
        <text id="2024022166bb9a0e67b141ee80000051">I do reiterate again that this program is undertaken by PIRSA under the agreement and therefore within the framework determined by Livestock SA, and obviously it needs to meet any legislative requirements. That is an agreement that, if it needs to be varied, needs to be varied with the endorsement of Livestock SA. That work is continuing, and I look forward to the outcomes of the review.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>