<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-02-08T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4713" />
  <endPage num="4772" />
  <dateModified time="2024-02-09T15:10:06+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Walker Tower</name>
      <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000382">
        <heading>Walker Tower</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6802" referenceid="c1fd605273be4c058a02036c43289159" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.A. SIMMS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-02-08T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Walker Tower</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-02-08T14:44:23+10:30" />
        <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000383">
          <timeStamp time="2024-02-08T14:44:23+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6802" referenceid="c1fd605273be4c058a02036c43289159">The Hon. R.A. SIMMS (14:44):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before addressing a question without notice to the minister representing the Minister for Planning on the topic of the second Walker Tower.</text>
        <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000384">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6802" referenceid="c1fd605273be4c058a02036c43289159" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.A. SIMMS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="4742" />
        <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000385">
          <by role="member" id="6802" referenceid="c1fd605273be4c058a02036c43289159">The Hon. R.A. SIMMS:</by>  Today, InDaily have reported on the negotiations between the Malinauskas government and the Walker Corporation over the building of a second tower on the Festival Plaza. InDaily reports that, and I quote from the article:</text>
        <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000386">
          <inserted>The Premier said there were 'a few different options kicking around' for the site but negotiations are currently focused on the commercial parameters of the new tower and what the public realm investment will be.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000387">
          <inserted>He confirmed the proposed building would be a mixed-use tower with retail and hospitality on the ground level and commercial and/or office space above.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000388">The article goes on to state that:</text>
        <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000389">
          <inserted>Malinauskas said the 'quid pro-quo' with Walker Corporation was allowing them to go 'potentially a lot further in height'.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000390">In 2021, it was reported that the state government contributed $213 million of public money towards upgrading the area around the first Walker Tower. Then, in 2020, the Adelaide <term>Advertiser</term> reported that the first Walker Tower was exempt from rates during the construction phase as it was situated on Crown land. The article stated that this was estimated to have cost the City of Adelaide $150,000 in lost revenue every year. I understand that SkyCity was exempt from rates during the construction phase because it was also on Crown land. However, the title was returned after construction was complete to ensure that SkyCity would be required to pay rates. My questions to the minister therefore are:</text>
        <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000391">1.&amp;#x9;Will the government rule out using more public money to support a private development on Crown land?</text>
        <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000392">2.&amp;#x9;If the second tower is built, will the government ensure that the development is required to pay rates to the City of Adelaide both during construction and after completion of the building?</text>
        <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000393">3.&amp;#x9;What does the Premier mean when he refers to potentially going a lot further in height? How high can the Malinauskas government go?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-02-08T14:46:42+10:30" />
        <text id="202402089e767cff060b46ec80000394">
          <timeStamp time="2024-02-08T14:46:42+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (14:46):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his questions. I noted that some parts of his introduction referred to decisions that I would assume were made under the previous government, given they were 2020 and 2021. In terms of the other parts of the question, I will refer it to the relevant minister in the other place and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>