<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2024-02-06T14:15:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4603" />
  <endPage num="4651" />
  <dateModified time="2024-02-07T15:39:55+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cost-Recovery Review Process</name>
      <page num="4624" />
      <text id="2024020671fa997235da465fa0000446">
        <heading>Cost-Recovery Review Process</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" referenceid="e7b583be01404e74b438589370882e1d" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-02-06T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Cost-Recovery Review Process</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-02-06T15:45:22+10:30" />
        <text id="2024020671fa997235da465fa0000447">
          <timeStamp time="2024-02-06T15:45:22+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5418" referenceid="e7b583be01404e74b438589370882e1d">The Hon. C. BONAROS (15:45):</by>  Supplementary: can I take from that response that the minister does not intend to share that report with industry stakeholders before reaching a final position?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-02-06T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Cost-Recovery Review Process</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-02-06T15:45:39+10:30" />
        <text id="2024020671fa997235da465fa0000448">
          <timeStamp time="2024-02-06T15:45:39+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (15:45):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her supplementary. I think there is perhaps a misnomer there in terms of talking about—I am not sure what the word was—final decisions or final contemplations. I continue to work with industry. They have been involved with the independent panel review. I have frequent meetings with industry associations. They are in contact with my office on a very regular basis, so to suggest that the outcome of review would be, if you like, an end of a process I think is to mischaracterise it. Certainly, there are a number of different issues that are raised, and I will continue to work with industry and discuss them both prior to the release of the government response and afterwards.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>