<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2023-11-16T14:15:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4355" />
  <endPage num="4406" />
  <dateModified time="2023-11-17T15:12:13+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Religious Vilification Laws</name>
      <text id="2023111616234094d256458ba0000141">
        <heading>Religious Vilification Laws</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4362" referenceid="9196416ed01f41d0801ce030b03cd39a" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.S. LEE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-11-16T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Religious Vilification Laws</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-11-16T14:44:37+10:30" />
        <text id="2023111616234094d256458ba0000142">
          <timeStamp time="2023-11-16T14:44:37+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4362" referenceid="9196416ed01f41d0801ce030b03cd39a">The Hon. J.S. LEE (Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:44):</by>  Supplementary: the Attorney-General mentioned representation already being made to the government. Can the Attorney-General outline which groups have actually made representations?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-11-16T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Religious Vilification Laws</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-11-16T14:44:55+10:30" />
        <text id="2023111616234094d256458ba0000143">
          <timeStamp time="2023-11-16T14:44:55+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (14:44):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. I think in the representations that have certainly been made to me there would be an expectation of privacy in those representations, so I'm not going to talk about the private representations that have been made in relation to that.</text>
        <text id="2023111616234094d256458ba0000144">I might also point out that it has been, for at least three or four years, something that can be taken into account in sentencing considerations. So although not a standalone law in terms of religious vilification, it is certainly something that—I think since about 2020 or 2021; I remember we passed it in this chamber during the last term—can be a consideration in terms of sentencing, so within our criminal law it is something that can be taken into account in relation to crimes that are committed against a person based on their religion.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>