<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2023-09-27T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3727" />
  <endPage num="3779" />
  <dateModified time="2023-10-17T11:04:26+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cabinet Documents</name>
      <text id="202309275b6284e03c194b5da0000158">
        <heading>Cabinet Documents</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" referenceid="1df522b2c3094a7386fc17e1fb16d162" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-09-27T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Cabinet Documents</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-09-27T14:55:30+09:30" />
        <text id="202309275b6284e03c194b5da0000159">
          <timeStamp time="2023-09-27T14:55:30+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="2742" referenceid="1df522b2c3094a7386fc17e1fb16d162">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:55):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before directing a question to the Attorney-General regarding one of the recent reports from the Auditor-General.</text>
        <text id="202309275b6284e03c194b5da0000160">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" referenceid="1df522b2c3094a7386fc17e1fb16d162" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202309275b6284e03c194b5da0000161">
          <by role="member" id="2742" referenceid="1df522b2c3094a7386fc17e1fb16d162">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  Two days ago, or yesterday maybe, the Auditor-General, Mr Andrew Richardson, released a report entitled 'Report 7 of 2023 Access to Cabinet documents' from which I now quote:</text>
        <text id="202309275b6284e03c194b5da0000162">
          <inserted>Several times since 2016, I have reported on issues associated with the Auditor‐General’s access to Cabinet submissions. In 2016, the then SA Government introduced changes to accessing Cabinet submissions for the given reason of maintaining Cabinet confidentiality. These changes had the effect of restricting the Auditor‐General’s access to Cabinet submissions for audit purposes.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202309275b6284e03c194b5da0000163">This report clearly sets out that since 2016 whenever Labor has been in government, including the recent Malinauskas government, access to cabinet documents has been denied, which in comparison to the Marshall Liberal government access was granted. On page 2 of the report, Mr Richardson states that all his 2023 requests, a total of 32, for cabinet submissions for audit purposes are unresolved. He states categorically that failing to provide the requested information means that the work the parliament has assigned to the Auditor-General cannot be completed.</text>
        <text id="202309275b6284e03c194b5da0000164">My question for the Attorney-General is: how does he respond to the Auditor-General's comments regarding cabinet's refusal to provide the information requested and that this is hindering the proper performance of his office's statutory functions as stated in the report?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2023-09-27T14:57:28+09:30" />
        <text id="202309275b6284e03c194b5da0000165">
          <timeStamp time="2023-09-27T14:57:28+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (14:57):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. As noted on page 1 in the executive summary of the Report of the Auditor-General, 'Report 7 of 2023 Access to Cabinet documents', for the majority of the time from the last government from March 2019 to March 2022 and since March 2022 the exact same process has applied.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>