<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2023-05-31T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2957" />
  <endPage num="3004" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T10:08:44+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Sentencing for Violent Offenders</name>
      <page num="2969" />
      <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000183">
        <heading>Sentencing for Violent Offenders</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" referenceid="5c423631416444aeb0c7e273b130ee55" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-05-31T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Sentencing for Violent Offenders</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-05-31T15:09:02+09:30" />
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000184">
          <timeStamp time="2023-05-31T15:09:02+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="3126" referenceid="5c423631416444aeb0c7e273b130ee55">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (15:09):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Attorney-General regarding sentencing in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000185">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" referenceid="5c423631416444aeb0c7e273b130ee55" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000186">
          <by role="member" id="3126" referenceid="5c423631416444aeb0c7e273b130ee55">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD:</by>  Last June, Max Staples and Jake Twohill proceeded to assault two men completely unprovoked—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000187">
          <by role="office">An honourable member:</by>  My question: good one.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" referenceid="5c423631416444aeb0c7e273b130ee55" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000188">
          <by role="member" id="3126" referenceid="5c423631416444aeb0c7e273b130ee55">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD:</by>  Okay, thank you—which resulted in both victims requiring serious medical attention. One of the victims was a young father of three children who sustained significant brain damage as a result of the completely random and unprovoked attack after he was repeatedly kicked and hit in the head. On Monday just this week, despite pleading guilty to the assault, with the magistrate stating, and I quote, 'With more than 30 years on board, it's probably the most significant ongoing harm that I've ever seen', the convicted offenders avoided jail, instead receiving a two-year good behaviour bond.</text>
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000189">My question to the Attorney-General is: does the Attorney-General consider it acceptable for convicted offenders who commit completely unprovoked, extremely violent attacks causing long-term injuries, including brain damage, to their victims to simply walk free from the courts?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2023-05-31T15:10:14+09:30" />
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000190">
          <timeStamp time="2023-05-31T15:10:14+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:10):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question, and I do acknowledge that he regularly asks questions in relation to this area and that he has long been concerned about the safety of the South Australian community. That is a credit to him. As we traversed over some of the reforms of the party he was formerly associated with—it had brought in reforms almost 20 years ago—it is acknowledged the work that has been done by the Hon. Dennis Hood and his predecessor in another party, Pastor Evans, who we spoke about yesterday.</text>
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000191">I don't have information in relation to the specifics of the offenders and the sentence the honourable member mentioned. I think, as I've said before, it is very difficult to give answers with certainty and clarity, not having had the benefit of hearing all the evidence that is put forward, often over many weeks in a trial, often with dozens and dozens of witnesses and hearing every aspect of what constituted the offending, what all the reasons were.</text>
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000192">So I'm not going to try to pass any sort of judgement or give reasons or proffer ideas about why a sentence may or may not have been handed down. However, I do note that in cases where sentences are manifestly inadequate or manifestly excessive an option remains for either party to a prosecution, the prosecution or the defendant, to appeal that sentence, and that does happen not infrequently.</text>
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000193">That is part of the nature of our judicial system—that where something falls that far outside what you would reasonably expect from what sort of sentences that have been imposed, given the range that parliament has seen fit to put for various sentences in the past, it is not an unusual thing that appeals are taken. If sentences are manifestly inadequate, it is something that the Office of the Director for Public Prosecutions does very regularly—appeal sentences.</text>
        <text id="20230531316066143d5741e1b0000194">Again, I don't know the specifics of this or whether there was remand that was a factor and time served taken into account in a sentence, but as I have said I'm not going to try to substitute, not having had the benefit of, very likely, weeks of detailed evidence through dozens of witnesses presented. But as I said, I do acknowledge the honourable member's interest and concern in making sure that South Australia is as safe as it can be.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>