<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2023-05-31T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2957" />
  <endPage num="3004" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T10:08:38+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Eyre Peninsula Desalination Project</name>
      <text id="20230531c2051b2e05bf46d690000053">
        <heading>Eyre Peninsula Desalination Project</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-05-31T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Eyre Peninsula Desalination Project</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-05-31T14:31:03+09:30" />
        <text id="20230531c2051b2e05bf46d690000054">
          <timeStamp time="2023-05-31T14:31:03+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI (Leader of the Opposition) (14:31):</by>  Supplementary: as minister for fisheries, do you not think you have the responsibility to have direct contact with and listen to the concerns of the aquaculture industry that has the potential to be affected by your government's decision?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-05-31T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Eyre Peninsula Desalination Project</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-05-31T14:31:24+09:30" />
        <text id="20230531c2051b2e05bf46d690000055">
          <timeStamp time="2023-05-31T14:31:24+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (14:31):</by>  I think that the industries are keen to engage around the science in regard to the concerns around impacts to aquaculture. As I just outlined, the scientific reports have indicated that there won't be the level of impacts that were feared. I think it's also worth pointing out that those opposite are clearly happy to have an additional $150 million on the taxpayer bill, which is what it would be if the proposed Sleaford West site was instead chosen.</text>
        <text id="20230531c2051b2e05bf46d690000056">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20230531c2051b2e05bf46d690000057">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20230531c2051b2e05bf46d690000058">
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  So I hear that those opposite are saying an extra $150 million is absolutely okay with them. I guess that does indicate their level of fiscal responsibility.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>