<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2023-05-30T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2789" />
  <endPage num="2955" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T10:07:54+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Southern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery</name>
      <text id="202305305a1ea6795ae645cfa0000256">
        <heading>Southern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-05-30T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Southern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-05-30T15:20:15+09:30" />
        <text id="202305305a1ea6795ae645cfa0000257">
          <timeStamp time="2023-05-30T15:20:15+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6706" referenceid="c8683bcbb226495ebf16e224a5e3db3c">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI (Leader of the Opposition) (15:20):</by>  Supplementary question: given the fact that there is no change in the export situation with China, why was the decision made not to continue with fee relief for this financial year?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-05-30T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Southern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-05-30T15:20:25+09:30" />
        <text id="202305305a1ea6795ae645cfa0000258">
          <timeStamp time="2023-05-30T15:20:25+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5412" referenceid="f6f1a5ffd4774774bcc2b9675cc1d44d">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (15:20):</by>  As I mentioned, the fee relief was only ever spoken about as a one-year fee relief. I think it's fair to say that the industry has done what it can in terms of diversifying its markets, as well as—as I understand it anecdotally—some increase to domestic supply. I think that's clearly the reasoning; it was only ever intended to be a one-year fee relief.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>