<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2023-03-07T14:15:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2191" />
  <endPage num="2240" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T09:59:01+09:30" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="202303077f52a9ffe46f410db0000172">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Summary Offences Act</name>
      <text id="202303077f52a9ffe46f410db0000173">
        <heading>Summary Offences Act</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" referenceid="e7b583be01404e74b438589370882e1d" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-03-07T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Summary Offences Act</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-03-07T14:53:45+10:30" />
        <text id="202303077f52a9ffe46f410db0000174">
          <timeStamp time="2023-03-07T14:53:45+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5418" referenceid="e7b583be01404e74b438589370882e1d">The Hon. C. BONAROS (14:53):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Attorney, to your knowledge have there been any prosecutions, successful or otherwise, pursuant to section 40 of the Summary Offences Act?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-03-07T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Summary Offences Act</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-03-07T14:54:03+10:30" />
        <text id="202303077f52a9ffe46f410db0000175">
          <timeStamp time="2023-03-07T14:54:03+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (14:54):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. It is a matter that came up recently. Sometimes we look at laws that have been historical laws in bits of legislation that have been there for a very long time. There are laws, for example, that were only recently repealed in Western Australia, which, if my memory serves me correctly, created an offence for carrying more than 50 kilograms of potatoes without the permission of the Potato Marketing Corporation—laws that have been around for various reasons but appear in statute books.</text>
        <text id="202303077f52a9ffe46f410db0000176">This is one that came up recently: section 40 of the Summary Offences Act is in relation to 'Acting as a spiritualist, medium etc with intent to defraud'. It has a long history of this and incarnations of this particular sort of offence that date right back to the United Kingdom's Witchcraft Act of 1735, under which I think the last attempted prosecutions were actually reasonably recently under the UK act in 1944, having been two cases that year.</text>
        <text id="202303077f52a9ffe46f410db0000177">There was one involving a woman called Rebecca York and, a more prominent one, a woman by the name of Helen Duncan who was alleged to have preyed on grieving people, claiming she could contact their departed loved ones and used the idea of being a medium as a thinly deceptive way to receive benefit. In relation to the South Australian section 40 of the Summary Offences Act, which states:</text>
        <text id="202303077f52a9ffe46f410db0000178">
          <inserted>A person who, with intent to defraud, purports to act as a spiritualist or medium, or to exercise powers of telepathy or clairvoyance or other similar powers, is guilty of an offence…[for up to] 2 years.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="202303077f52a9ffe46f410db0000179">I have checked and I am not aware of any prosecutions that have successfully been undertaken for someone who acts with intent to defraud as any of those sorts of things. I thank the honourable member for her important question and her interest in all manner of offences.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>