<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2023-02-09T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1925" />
  <endPage num="1974" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T09:45:52+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Industrial Relations</name>
      <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000370">
        <heading>Industrial Relations</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6827" referenceid="b04d90ce5a204cc6b8913d2697f86b49" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. H.M. GIROLAMO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-02-09T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Industrial Relations</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-02-09T14:34:18+10:30" />
        <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000371">
          <timeStamp time="2023-02-09T14:34:18+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6827" referenceid="b04d90ce5a204cc6b8913d2697f86b49">The Hon. H.M. GIROLAMO (14:34):</by>  I seek leave to give a brief explanation before asking the Attorney-General a question about simply rocking up to work on time.</text>
        <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000372">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6827" referenceid="b04d90ce5a204cc6b8913d2697f86b49" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. H.M. GIROLAMO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="1942" />
        <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000373">
          <by role="member" id="6827" referenceid="b04d90ce5a204cc6b8913d2697f86b49">The Hon. H.M. GIROLAMO:</by>  In a newly negotiated agreement between Crane Services and the CFMEU, which was brokered by convicted domestic violence perpetrator and Labor supporter Mr John Setka, employees receive a bonus for simply turning up to work on time and wearing their correct uniform. My questions to the Attorney are:</text>
        <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000374">1.&amp;#x9;Do you think it's reasonable to be paid a bonus for simply rocking up to work on time?</text>
        <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000375">2.&amp;#x9;Do you think it's reasonable for small business to be paying extra for what is deemed as 'business as usual' in an employer-employee situation and getting to work on time and wearing your correct uniform and doing the work you are salaried to do?</text>
        <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000376">3.&amp;#x9;Is this bonus scheme something that the Labor Party will look to introduce within the public sector awards?</text>
        <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000377">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000378">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order! Don't be baited by the Hon. Mr Wortley. Just listen to the answer to your question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2023-02-09T14:35:33+10:30" />
        <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000379">
          <timeStamp time="2023-02-09T14:35:33+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (14:35):</by>  Probably the most correct answer is to explain to the honourable member that the industrial relations jurisdiction for private companies has nothing at all whatsoever to do with the state, nothing at all to do with what I'm responsible to parliament for, but is entirely a creature and provenance of the commonwealth system. Now that the honourable member knows that, I'm sure she will be able to ask her questions on something that is of relevance to the South Australian parliament or on something that we have responsibility for. </text>
        <text id="20230209d076cefccdb944fdb0000380">However, that being said and now being convinced that the honourable member has learnt and has a better understanding of the industrial relations system in Australia, what I can say is I think it is entirely appropriate that companies—and again, companies that are entirely governed by the federal industrial relations system and those who negotiated with it—come up with agreements that they agree to, that they be a combination of conditions of different pay structures, of different pay increases, of different parts of entitlements. I think it is entirely appropriate that is up to those parties that are part of a national system to come up with a range of things that suit both parties' interest.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>