<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2023-02-07T14:15:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1817" />
  <endPage num="1878" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T09:43:52+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Poker Machines</name>
      <text id="202302079e2a398847dd4590a0000233">
        <heading>Poker Machines</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" referenceid="e7b583be01404e74b438589370882e1d" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-02-07T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>Poker Machines</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-02-07T15:14:04+10:30" />
        <text id="202302079e2a398847dd4590a0000234">
          <timeStamp time="2023-02-07T15:14:04+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5418" referenceid="e7b583be01404e74b438589370882e1d">The Hon. C. BONAROS (15:14):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Attorney, representing the Minister for Business and Consumer Affairs in another place, a question about poker machine reforms.</text>
        <text id="202302079e2a398847dd4590a0000235">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" referenceid="e7b583be01404e74b438589370882e1d" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202302079e2a398847dd4590a0000236">
          <by role="member" id="5418" referenceid="e7b583be01404e74b438589370882e1d">The Hon. C. BONAROS:</by>  Other state governments across the country are showing leadership and courage in introducing reforms to combat the damage poker machines are having in their jurisdictions. The latest is the New South Wales Liberal government, which yesterday announced plans to have every poker machine in New South Wales cashless within five years under an ambitious plan to overhaul their gambling industry.</text>
        <text id="202302079e2a398847dd4590a0000237">In announcing those reforms, the New South Wales Premier said they were about looking after the vulnerable and stopping money laundering. This follows Australian-first reforms introduced by the Tasmanian government late last year, where gamblers in the state will be prevented from spending more than $5,000 a year on poker machines unless they apply to increase that limit.</text>
        <page num="1827" />
        <text id="202302079e2a398847dd4590a0000238">The Labor oppositions in both states have also flagged major poker machine reforms should they form government. To be clear, in both of those jurisdictions there are clear agendas to reduce problem gambling in their respective states despite the impact in tax revenue. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="202302079e2a398847dd4590a0000239">1.&amp;#x9;Does the state government have any plans to show the same sort of intestinal fortitude, not before time, similar to the New South Wales and Tasmanian governments and introduce meaningful bona fide reforms aimed at tackling the scourge of poker machine gambling?</text>
        <text id="202302079e2a398847dd4590a0000240">2.&amp;#x9;Does the government acknowledge that here in South Australia poker machine revenue is actually getting worse to the tune of $2.2 million a day, especially given the revelation of losses of $831 million in 2021-22 alone?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2023-02-07T15:16:08+10:30" />
        <text id="202302079e2a398847dd4590a0000241">
          <timeStamp time="2023-02-07T15:16:08+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:16):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question and her very longstanding and her party's longstanding interest, as other members of this place also have a very longstanding interest in the issues to do with poker machines and gambling. I will refer them to the minister responsible in the other place and bring back a reply for the honourable member.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202302079e2a398847dd4590a0000242">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  It is terrific for me to be able to call the Hon. Mr Hood. It is great to see you, the Hon. Mr Hood, and on behalf of all members I am sure we wish you well.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>