<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-11-30T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1687" />
  <endPage num="1769" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T09:42:16+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>First Nations Voice to Parliament</name>
      <text id="202211308288cf638850417ab0000619">
        <heading>First Nations Voice to Parliament</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" referenceid="79dc8a501398441b8ca75e3aff916323" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-11-30T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>First Nations Voice to Parliament</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-11-30T15:10:35+10:30" />
        <text id="202211308288cf638850417ab0000620">
          <timeStamp time="2022-11-30T15:10:35+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="3164" referenceid="79dc8a501398441b8ca75e3aff916323">The Hon. S.G. WADE (15:10):</by>  Further supplementary: the honourable minister's answer to the question from the Hon. Laura Curran highlighted that it is appropriate for members of the Voice to be remunerated for their time, and I agree with that. Is the need to limit the budget for the remuneration of members the reason why there has been a cap on meetings proposed in the draft bill? It seems somewhat peculiar to say, 'We are establishing a group but they shall not meet any more than X number of times.'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-11-30T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>First Nations Voice to Parliament</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-11-30T15:11:06+10:30" />
        <text id="202211308288cf638850417ab0000621">
          <timeStamp time="2022-11-30T15:11:06+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:11):</by>  No, it's not a budgetary statement, it's more an administrative constraint. I just can't remember what the number is, but it is no fewer and no more than a certain number of meetings, both for local Voices and the statewide Voice. But it does provide for the ability for more to be held with the agreement of the local or the statewide Voice and the minister, so it doesn't exclude the possibility but just as a matter of reasonableness and also to give people who might consider standing some idea of what may be involved. I can't remember the number but it might be no fewer than four and no more than six in any given year, I think. But those are the reasons in the draft bill and, as I said, it is out for a second round of consultation now.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>