<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-11-29T14:15:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1641" />
  <endPage num="1686" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T09:41:23+09:30" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Personal Explanation</name>
    <text id="20221129aaf2c272d8e945ec90000658">
      <heading>Personal Explanation</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Matter of Privilege</name>
      <text id="20221129aaf2c272d8e945ec90000659">
        <heading>Matter of Privilege</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5413" referenceid="07ef1306959a44c38acfb7dce9a031db" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. E.S. BOURKE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2022-11-29T17:37:11+10:30" />
        <text id="20221129aaf2c272d8e945ec90000660">
          <timeStamp time="2022-11-29T17:37:11+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5413" referenceid="07ef1306959a44c38acfb7dce9a031db">The Hon. E.S. BOURKE (17:37):</by>  I seek leave to make a personal explanation.</text>
        <text id="20221129aaf2c272d8e945ec90000661">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5413" referenceid="07ef1306959a44c38acfb7dce9a031db" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. E.S. BOURKE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20221129aaf2c272d8e945ec90000662">
          <by role="member" id="5413" referenceid="07ef1306959a44c38acfb7dce9a031db">The Hon. E.S. BOURKE:</by>  Earlier today, the Hon. Dr Nicola Centofanti raised a matter of privilege in relation to answers I gave in question time on 8 September 2022. On 8 September, I was asked a question by the Hon. Stephen Wade regarding the government's policy to invest in mental health and learning support specialists. Based on the advice that I had received at the time my answer was that the government has committed an additional $50 million over four years to employ 100 additional mental health and learning support specialists.</text>
        <page num="1681" />
        <text id="20221129aaf2c272d8e945ec90000663">The Hon. Stephen Wade then clarified that the question related to whether these 100 specialists were in addition to the 55 specialists committed to by the former government and I repeated my response. The response I gave was consistent—word for word—with the advice that I was given. Having reviewed <term>Hansard</term> and considered the advice now provided to me, I would like to apologise and correct the record.</text>
        <text id="20221129aaf2c272d8e945ec90000664">I have today been advised that the 55 specialists that the Hon. Stephen Wade referred to in his question were a commitment made by the former government. I am advised none of these 55 specialists were employed prior to the election. Our government's commitment was for a total of 100 specialists. I have also now been advised that the $50 million funding for these specialists was funding from within the Department for Education that has been allocated to employ 100 mental health and learning support specialists, consistent with the government's election commitment to make this investment.</text>
        <text id="20221129aaf2c272d8e945ec90000665">I apologise to the parliament for not clearly expressing this information. It is a privilege to step foot on the floor of this parliament and I would never knowingly or intentionally mislead the members of this chamber. It is safe to say that this has been a learning experience for me. I understand that I expressed advice as fact and will not make that mistake again. I am pleased that we are investing $50 million over four years to employ mental health and learning support specialists. My focus is to ensure that this important policy is given the respect and space it deserves to be successful.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>