<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-10-19T14:15:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1151" />
  <endPage num="1200" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T09:35:05+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>District Court</name>
      <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000304">
        <heading>District Court</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" referenceid="79dc8a501398441b8ca75e3aff916323" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-10-19T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>District Court</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-10-19T15:18:03+10:30" />
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000305">
          <timeStamp time="2022-10-19T15:18:03+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="3164" referenceid="79dc8a501398441b8ca75e3aff916323">The Hon. S.G. WADE (15:18):</by>  My questions are to the Attorney-General in relation to the District Court:</text>
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000306">1.&amp;#x9;What progress has been made in the appointment of additional associates to the judges of the District Court funded in the 2022-23 budget?</text>
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000307">2.&amp;#x9;Has the District Court advised how much of the $2.8 million provided in the context of the Ironside cases will be allocated to funding associates?</text>
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000308">3.&amp;#x9;How many associates have been appointed thus far?</text>
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000309">4.&amp;#x9;What impact are these appointments having in reducing the backlog of both criminal and civil lists?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-10-19T03:45:00+10:30">
            <name>District Court</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-10-19T15:19:00+10:30" />
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000310">
          <timeStamp time="2022-10-19T15:19:00+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:19):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question in relation to extra budget provision that was made in relation to Operation Ironside cases that are finding their way, first, through the Magistrates Court, but I think the vast majority of the actual trials will be held in the District Court.</text>
        <page num="1168" />
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000311">As we have talked about in this chamber before and certainly during the estimates process in some detail, there was the ANOM messaging system that was used, an encrypted network that was installed on Android devices and used by law enforcement agencies right around the world to gain intelligence on illegal activities. In South Australia, they were predominantly but not exclusively controlled by members and associates of outlaw motorcycle gangs who used the platform.</text>
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000312">I am informed that as of August of this year, around 90 people had been arrested and charged by South Australia Police in relation to the Operation Ironside investigation, charges including conspiracy to murder, conspiracy to cause serious harm, participating in a criminal organisation, money laundering, arson, trafficking in large commercial quantities of various controlled substances, and other firearms offences.</text>
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000313">I am informed that there are a number of ongoing matters for investigation and for consideration of prosecution. What we do know is it will have an impact on the flow through the court processes and, as the honourable member has correctly pointed out, particularly through the District Court, which will see quite a number of these matters when they come to trial.</text>
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000314">There was the budget allocation in this year's budget to provide for a number of requests that the Courts Administration Authority had put forward to deal with this increase in workload and, certainly, as I recall—and I will double-check if it's not correct—some of those were in relation to associates in the District Court. Of course, it is a matter for the Courts Administration Authority, as it is set up under its own legislation in South Australia, to allocate, when resources provide, how they are spent, but I am not sure whether people have been employed yet or not.</text>
        <text id="202210197bd31491796941c090000315">It is also the case that in providing these resources it recognises that if they weren't provided it would have significant impacts on other cases and other matters that flow through our court system. So it has the double effect of making sure there is the timely and effective management of the trials of Ironside cases, but also being used to make sure the cases aren't creating an unnecessary backlog because of those cases in our system.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>