<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-09-07T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="885" />
  <endPage num="934" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T09:31:04+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>COVID-19 Vaccine, Freedom of Information</name>
      <text id="20220907028a96517d214efc80000238">
        <heading>COVID-19 Vaccine, Freedom of Information</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6929" referenceid="53ca1cd2e19847a59766892bec169fa3" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.L. GAME</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-09-07T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>COVID-19 Vaccine, Freedom of Information</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-09-07T15:10:38+09:30" />
        <text id="20220907028a96517d214efc80000239">
          <timeStamp time="2022-09-07T15:10:38+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6929" referenceid="53ca1cd2e19847a59766892bec169fa3">The Hon. S.L. GAME (15:10):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before addressing a question to the Attorney-General, representing the Minister for Health and Wellbeing, on COVID information transparency.</text>
        <text id="20220907028a96517d214efc80000240">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6929" referenceid="53ca1cd2e19847a59766892bec169fa3" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.L. GAME</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="898" />
        <text id="20220907028a96517d214efc80000241">
          <by role="member" id="6929" referenceid="53ca1cd2e19847a59766892bec169fa3">The Hon. S.L. GAME:</by>  I have been contacted by a constituent who submitted a freedom of information application to understand the research, studies and datasets behind the 'Get the facts, get the vax' television campaign implemented by SA Health. It took over seven months and an external review intervention by Ombudsman SA to receive a communication containing 21 pages of information about face masks, not vaccines; four publicly available PDFs about the importance of COVID intervention measures; and a line stating, 'Unfortunately, there was no documentation that addressed the description of [the applicant's] application'.</text>
        <text id="20220907028a96517d214efc80000242">The only two conclusions the applicant and the Ombudsman could draw are that there is no evidence behind the 'Get the facts, get the vax' television campaign or SA Health is deliberately choosing to withhold information and evidence from the community, in contradiction of the Freedom of Information Act 1991.</text>
        <text id="20220907028a96517d214efc80000243">The review also notes several incidents of procedural contraventions of the legislation, all documented by the Ombudsman. People have genuine concerns over the vaccine, and they want to see information with their own eyes. My question is:</text>
        <text id="20220907028a96517d214efc80000244">1.&amp;#x9;Why is the department withholding evidence from people seeking FOIs on important, specific COVID vaccine information?</text>
        <text id="20220907028a96517d214efc80000245">2.&amp;#x9;Will the government commit to being timely and transparent with requested information?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2022-09-07T15:12:19+09:30" />
        <text id="20220907028a96517d214efc80000246">
          <timeStamp time="2022-09-07T15:12:19+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697" referenceid="c1607c57d2294390bdc2b07c15f35010">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:12):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. I will refer that to the relevant minister in another place and bring back a reply.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>