<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-09-06T14:15:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="793" />
  <endPage num="882" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T09:30:22+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Return to Work Scheme</name>
      <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001611">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Return to Work Scheme</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="" referenceid="5418" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-09-06T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Return to Work Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001612">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="" referenceid="5418">the Hon. C. BONAROS </by>().16 June 2022).  </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="" referenceid="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-09-06T04:45:00+09:30">
            <name>Return to Work Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001613">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="" referenceid="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Attorney-General, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector):</by>  I have been advised:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001614">
          <inserted>ReturnToWorkSA monitors significant legal matters which affect and define the boundaries of the Return to Work Scheme. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001615">
          <inserted>ReturnToWorkSA is aware of a number of ongoing matters which concern the interpretation and boundaries of the Full Court of the Supreme Court's decision in Summerfield. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001616">
          <inserted>The most directly relevant are the matters of Williams and English. I assume the second question relates to those matters.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="878" />
        <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001617">
          <inserted>The matter of Williams relates to an appeal lodged by the worker which is to be heard by the Court of Appeal. At the full bench of the South Australian Employment Tribunal, ReturnToWorkSA was successful in arguing that the reasoning in the decisions in Summerfield and Preedy did not apply to the worker's case. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001618">
          <inserted>The matter of English also involves similar questions as to the boundaries of the Summerfield decision. In that matter, ReturnToWorkSA is appealing a single judge decision of the SAET relating to the combination of impairments. The full bench of the SAET has determined to refer the matter straight to the Court of Appeal. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001619">
          <inserted>I am advised that, on 16 June 2022, the matters of English and Williams were joined so that the Court of Appeal may deal with both at the same time.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001620">
          <inserted>I wish to emphasise, particularly considering the passage of the Return to Work (Scheme Sustainability) Amendment Bill, that the scope of the legal dispute in the matters of Williams and English is to clarify the boundaries and application of the Summerfield decision. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20220906ff4e066a5fe7455cb0001621">
          <inserted>I am advised that ReturnToWorkSA is not seeking to overturn to decision of Summerfield in those matters.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>