<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-07-06T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="673" />
  <endPage num="710" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T14:07:16+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Motions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Abortion Access</name>
      <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000350">
        <heading>Abortion Access</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2022-07-06T17:05:17" />
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000351">
          <timeStamp time="2022-07-06T17:05:17" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (17:05):</by>  I move:</text>
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000352">
          <inserted>That this council—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000353">
          <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;Affirms the right to access termination of pregnancy services through quality health services under the law;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000354">
          <inserted>2.&amp;#x9;Acknowledges that the Termination of Pregnancy Act 2021 commenced on 7 July 2022; and</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000355">
          <inserted>3.&amp;#x9;Indicates that, barring significant unintended impacts, the Legislative Council would not support revisiting the law in this parliament.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="700" />
        <text continued="true" id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000356">Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States of America stepped away from Roe v Wade as an authoritative legal precedent. The court no longer recognises that there is an entrenched legal right to abortion under the Federal Constitution of the United States. While this decision has no legal impact in Australia, it has raised concerns that access to termination of pregnancy services in Australia will be curtailed.</text>
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000357">I think it is important to stress the different legal context in each country. In the United States access to abortion has relied on a 1973 decision of the Supreme Court, a decision made 49 years ago. In the Australian context, access to abortion primarily relies on legislative regimes put in place by state parliaments. In 1969, South Australia became the first Australian jurisdiction to legislate for lawful termination of pregnancy. There is strong community support for continued access to termination of pregnancy services in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000358">Since 1969, there have been significant developments in abortion practice. In particular, medical abortions have become available, which no longer involve surgical procedures. The law needed to be updated to reflect contemporary clinical practice, to uphold patient care standards and provide equity of access, particularly for regional South Australians. Last year, the parliament of South Australia passed the Termination of Pregnancy Act 2021. The law moved regulation of termination from the criminal law to health law and updated the law in light of the significant changes in medical practice over the last 50 years.</text>
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000359">Many South Australians are concerned that the Roe v Wade decision may lead to moves to not only wind back the modernisation of the law provided by the 2021 reforms but also significantly limit access to termination of pregnancy. The motion I move today gives the opportunity for the Legislative Council to reassure the people of South Australia that this parliament, in a pluralist society, will continue to support access to termination of pregnancy. The motion gives the opportunity for the Legislative Council to recognise the significant work done to get the balance right in the Termination of Pregnancy Act 2021.</text>
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000360">In particular, a substantial report was prepared by the South Australian Law Reform Institute and extensive debate was undertaken in both houses of parliament. The parliament has a range of issues that it needs to address, both legislative and policy. I cannot see the justification for prioritising revisiting this legislation when a thorough review was only concluded last year.</text>
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000361">This motion gives the opportunity for the Legislative Council to affirm the reality that it will take time to discern the strengths and weaknesses of the updated law. The law has not even come into effect. It will take time for the act to be implemented, it will take time for its impact to be assessed. Barring significant unintended impacts, it would be premature for the act to be revisited in this parliamentary term. I stress that this motion is being put by me as a private member. I commend the motion to the council and I seek leave to conclude my remarks.</text>
        <text id="20220706d0abc88c15d641b1a0000362">Leave granted; debate adjourned.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>