<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-07-06T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="673" />
  <endPage num="710" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T14:07:02+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>SkyCity Adelaide</name>
      <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000069">
        <heading>SkyCity Adelaide</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-07-06">
            <name>SkyCity Adelaide</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-07-06T14:47:42" />
        <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000070">
          <timeStamp time="2022-07-06T14:47:42" />
          <by role="member" id="5418">The Hon. C. BONAROS (14:47):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Attorney-General, representing the Minister for Consumer and Business Affairs in another place, a question about the Adelaide Casino.</text>
        <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000071">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="678" />
        <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000072">
          <by role="member" id="5418">The Hon. C. BONAROS:</by>  Since I last asked a question on this topic last week, the state's gambling regulator, Mr Dini Soulio, has announced he is commissioning an independent review of Casino operations in South Australia. This is after Mr Soulio suspended his department's own review into the Casino last year and after AUSTRAC advised it was investigating 'the casino's management of customers identified as high risk and politically exposed persons'.</text>
        <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000073">PEPs, as they are dubbed, are defined as individuals who hold a prominent public position or role in a government body or international organisation either in Australia or overseas. Immediate family members and/or close associates of these individuals are also considered PEPs. Examples given include heads of state, government ministers or equivalent politicians, senior government executives, high-ranking judges, high-ranking military officers, central bank governors or board members, or executives of an international organisation—that is not a complete list.</text>
        <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000074">Due to Mr Soulio's concerns over broader systemic issues within the Casino industry, he has decided to commission the independent review, to be undertaken by retired Supreme Court Judge the Hon. Brian Martin AO QC. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000075">1.&amp;#x9;What, if any, assurances have the government sought from AUSTRAC and/or Mr Soulio about the high risk and politically exposed persons subject of the AUSTRAC investigation?</text>
        <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000076">2.&amp;#x9;Has the government sought assurances from AUSTRAC and/or Mr Soulio that the PEP does not pose a threat to national or state security?</text>
        <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000077">3.&amp;#x9;Has the government sought assurances from AUSTRAC and/or Mr Soulio that the PEP is not a member of parliament?</text>
        <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000078">4.&amp;#x9;Does the government support a call from SA-Best, and backed by the Greens and One Nation, for a royal commission into the Casino, noting the significant failings of casinos interstate?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2022-07-06T14:49:53" />
        <text id="20220706003170fed66b478ba0000079">
          <timeStamp time="2022-07-06T14:49:53" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Attorney-General, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (14:49):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question and her ongoing and significant interest in these matters. I will refer them to the minister in another place and bring back a reply.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>