<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-06-15T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="501" />
  <endPage num="556" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T14:02:15+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Return to Work Scheme</name>
      <page num="515" />
      <text id="202206153f916a8557824c2ea0000255">
        <heading>Return to Work Scheme</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-06-15">
            <name>Return to Work Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-06-15T15:07:03" />
        <text id="202206153f916a8557824c2ea0000256">
          <timeStamp time="2022-06-15T15:07:03" />
          <by role="member" id="5418">The Hon. C. BONAROS (15:07):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Industrial Relations a question about the Return to Work scheme.</text>
        <text id="202206153f916a8557824c2ea0000257">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202206153f916a8557824c2ea0000258">
          <by role="member" id="5418">The Hon. C. BONAROS:</by>  During the last sitting week, I asked the minister questions about a bill moved in this place by the Hon. Irene Pnevmatikos, namely the Return to Work (Impairment Assessment Guidelines) Amendment Bill, aimed at addressing the manner by which the former industrial relations minister made changes to the guidelines which, in this minister's words, 'drastically change the Impairment Assessment Guidelines that affect some of the most vulnerable injured workers in South Australia'. As we know, that bill passed this chamber with the full support and endorsement of the Labor Party. My questions to the Attorney are:</text>
        <text id="202206153f916a8557824c2ea0000259">1.&amp;#x9;Has the government committed to reverse changes made to the Impairment Assessment Guidelines by the former industrial relations minister? If so, when and how will this occur?</text>
        <text id="202206153f916a8557824c2ea0000260">2.&amp;#x9;Does the minister stand by his commitment in this place to make Impairment Assessment Guidelines disallowable legislative instruments?</text>
        <text id="202206153f916a8557824c2ea0000261">3.&amp;#x9;Does the minister acknowledge the changes by the former government focused almost exclusively on injuries that were the subject of cases where ReturnToWork was unsuccessful in its legal challenges?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2022-06-15T15:08:28" />
        <text id="202206153f916a8557824c2ea0000262">
          <timeStamp time="2022-06-15T15:08:28" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Attorney-General, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:08):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her questions. I am not sure I'm taking them in order but, yes, this government remains committed to making changes to those guidelines as a disallowable legislative instrument, yet many of the guidelines that were published by the former minister in the former government we will seek to reverse. There are a few of those that are acknowledged, I think, by all those who use the scheme as useful parts to give clarification or interpretation on some areas but, yes, by and large we intend to reverse those and make future guidelines disallowable instruments.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>