<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-06-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="407" />
  <endPage num="448" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Custody</name>
      <text id="2022060236b2d0172cc54da490000391">
        <heading>Child Custody</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6929" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.L. GAME</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-06-02">
            <name>Child Custody</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-06-02T14:33:29" />
        <text id="2022060236b2d0172cc54da490000392">
          <timeStamp time="2022-06-02T14:33:29" />
          <by role="member" id="6929">The Hon. S.L. GAME (14:33):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before addressing a question to the Attorney-General on South Australians fighting for custody of their children.</text>
        <text id="2022060236b2d0172cc54da490000393">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6929" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.L. GAME</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2022060236b2d0172cc54da490000394">
          <by role="member" id="6929">The Hon. S.L. GAME:</by>  I have been contacted by a number of constituents who have had their lives torn apart by former partners restricting access to their children. They now face long and expensive battles in court. Parenting proceedings in the federal circuit and Family Court of Australia cost an average of $50,000 per parent but may cost many hundreds of thousands depending on the complexity of the case and how well the other side is funded.</text>
        <page num="436" />
        <text id="2022060236b2d0172cc54da490000395">It can take many years for custody cases to be resolved and for alienated parents left with years of worry and isolation from their children. My question to the Attorney-General is: in what way is the Malinauskas government going to work with the new federal government to advocate for the South Australian parents alienated from their children while being caught up in the expensive and time-consuming web of the court system?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2022-06-02T14:34:31" />
        <text id="2022060236b2d0172cc54da490000396">
          <timeStamp time="2022-06-02T14:34:31" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Attorney-General, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (14:34):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question and her interest in this area. I think, as the honourable member alluded to in the question, the Family Court, or it is now part of the Federal Court, is a commonwealth jurisdiction. Certainly, we do in South Australia, and will continue to, advocate for those involved in the federal system to make sure people have reasonable access to justice.</text>
        <text id="2022060236b2d0172cc54da490000397">We have institutions in South Australia like the Legal Services Commission, like Community Justice Centres, like the Aboriginal Legal Rights Movement, that do help people who face barriers because of their personal circumstances and financial ability to access the justice system. We are happy to advocate, as we often do, to make sure that those who have struggled to access justice and participate in the legal system can do so if they have financial barriers, in particular, to doing that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>