<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-05-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="201" />
  <endPage num="277" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gender-Specific Language</name>
      <text id="202205184d6d834d782243e6a0000459">
        <heading>Gender-Specific Language</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-05-18">
            <name>Gender-Specific Language</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-05-18T14:45:08" />
        <text id="202205184d6d834d782243e6a0000460">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-18T14:45:08" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (14:45):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Attorney-General regarding gender-specific language.</text>
        <text id="202205184d6d834d782243e6a0000461">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202205184d6d834d782243e6a0000462">
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD:</by>  It was recently revealed that the official Australian Labor Party's national platform has removed the words 'mothers', 'breastfeeding' and 'pregnant women' from its platform. Its revised policy now utilises non gender-specific words such as 'people' and 'individuals' in their place in the context of pregnancy-related matters.</text>
        <text id="202205184d6d834d782243e6a0000463">Women's rights advocates have since criticised the ALP's move to eradicate female-specific language, with one such advocate questioning whether the party, and I quote directly, 'acknowledges and respects the existence of women, their unique experience of pregnancy and motherhood, and the fact of biological sex'. My questions to the Attorney are:</text>
        <text id="202205184d6d834d782243e6a0000464">1.&amp;#x9;Does the Attorney-General support the ALP's actions to remove the words 'mothers', 'breastfeeding' and 'pregnant women' from its national policy platform in favour of non gender-specific words?</text>
        <text id="202205184d6d834d782243e6a0000465">2.&amp;#x9;How does the Attorney-General justify the ALP's actions in response to women's rights advocates?</text>
        <text id="202205184d6d834d782243e6a0000466">3.&amp;#x9;Will the Attorney-General commit to retaining the use of the words 'mothers', 'breastfeeding' and 'pregnant women' in South Australian legislation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2022-05-18T14:46:24" />
        <page num="230" />
        <text id="202205184d6d834d782243e6a0000467">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-18T14:46:24" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Attorney-General, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (14:46):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. Certainly, as a matter of course, I am in favour of language that's always as inclusive as possible. I am not responsible to this chamber, or in fact anywhere else, for what federal Labor has in their policy, but I am certain that if the honourable member has a concern he could take it up with the federal Labor Party.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>