<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-05-17T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="153" />
  <endPage num="199" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:58:44+09:30" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20220517985ae96f2c174e5380000086">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Marine Scalefish Fishery</name>
      <text id="20220517985ae96f2c174e5380000087">
        <heading>Marine Scalefish Fishery</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6706" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-05-17">
            <name>Marine Scalefish Fishery</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-05-17T14:37:09" />
        <text id="20220517985ae96f2c174e5380000088">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-17T14:37:09" />
          <by role="member" id="6706">The Hon. N.J. CENTOFANTI (Leader of the Opposition) (14:37):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development. Does the minister's decision to allocate additional quota units in the marine scalefish fishery apply to all licensed marine scalefish fishers who applied for exceptional circumstances and were recognised as having exceptional circumstances by the previous minister or only those who appealed to the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forest Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-05-17">
            <name>Marine Scalefish Fishery</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-05-17T14:37:40" />
        <page num="156" />
        <text id="20220517985ae96f2c174e5380000089">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-17T14:37:40" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Minister for Forest Industries) (14:37):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. Members will recall that this line of questioning is in regard to the bungle by the former minister for primary industries in terms of allocating a policy that came to be known as the pro-rata policy, which SACAT found had no legal foundation and in fact entrenched disadvantage. In fact, to quote, it 'singled out those fishers unfairly disadvantaged by the general allocation process and effectively sought to enshrine that disadvantage'.</text>
        <text id="20220517985ae96f2c174e5380000090">In terms of who will be covered, I can advise that the decision to remedy the appalling errors of the former minister applies to all those with approved exceptional circumstances who were then given a pro-rata share of surrendered licences, and it's not specific to only those who applied at SACAT.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>