<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-05-17T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="153" />
  <endPage num="199" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:58:59+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Treaty</name>
      <text id="202205175a4c40dee3e14655a0000298">
        <heading>Treaty</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-05-17">
            <name>Treaty</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-05-17T15:23:18" />
        <text id="202205175a4c40dee3e14655a0000299">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-17T15:23:18" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (15:23):</by>  Supplementary from the original answer: the process is Truth, Treaty, Voice. What role will a truth and justice process play in South Australia's Treaty?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-05-17">
            <name>Treaty</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-05-17T15:23:28" />
        <text id="202205175a4c40dee3e14655a0000300">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-17T15:23:28" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Attorney-General, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:23):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. She is quite right that the three tenets that came out of the statement from Uluru were a Voice to Parliament—a constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament. As I outlined in an earlier question today, the level of support for that right around Australia is increasing. The statistics show over the last three years the level of support for that constitutionally enshrined federal Voice to Parliament has gone from about two-thirds to about three-quarters, according to ABC Vote Compass.</text>
        <text id="202205175a4c40dee3e14655a0000301">The next tenet from the Uluru Statement from the Heart is a treaty process—a Makarrata process, a Yolngu word for coming together after times of trouble or times apart; a treaty or agreement-making process. The third tenet—and I think it is recognised that none of these have primacy over the other, they are all very important parts—is a truth-telling process. I think it is recognised that in implementing the first of those, the Voice and the Treaty parts, truth-telling has to play a component along the way. It is not just an end in itself but part of everything else you do. Certainly, that is the third element of what we have committed to.</text>
        <text id="202205175a4c40dee3e14655a0000302">I think it was NAIDOC Week in the middle of 2019 when the Labor opposition—Labor having lost the federal election—decided we couldn't wait to see a change in federal government, to see a Labor federal government, to implement the statement from Uluru, but that if we were lucky enough to be elected as a state government we needed to do our part to progress this. This is what we committed to in opposition and what we are starting to process and will do from government now in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="202205175a4c40dee3e14655a0000303">The Uluru Statement from the Heart process, the consultations that went on right throughout Australia, were by far the most comprehensive consultation there has ever been with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people across this country. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people set out the steps forward: Truth, Treaty, Voice. That hasn't been enacted but we will do that at a state level, and I am really hopeful we will have a federal government that will do that at a federal level.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>