<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2022-05-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="25" />
  <endPage num="66" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Ombudsman Investigation, Member for Bragg</name>
      <text id="202205047c445ffff487405790000193">
        <heading>Ombudsman Investigation, Member for Bragg</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6827" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. H.M. GIROLAMO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-05-04">
            <name>Ombudsman Investigation, Member for Bragg</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-05-04T15:02:47" />
        <text id="202205047c445ffff487405790000194">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-04T15:02:47" />
          <by role="member" id="6827">The Hon. H.M. GIROLAMO (15:02):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before directing a question to the Attorney-General regarding the Ombudsman's report.</text>
        <text id="202205047c445ffff487405790000195">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6827" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. H.M. GIROLAMO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202205047c445ffff487405790000196">
          <by role="member" id="6827">The Hon. H.M. GIROLAMO:</by>  The Ombudsman, in his introduction to his report regarding the referral to last year's kangaroo court select committee, states:</text>
        <text id="202205047c445ffff487405790000197">
          <inserted>I found the referral to be imprecise and requiring a greater level of interpretation by me than is ideal. I have accepted that the referral requires me to inquire into matters on which the select committee findings were made, namely, when Ms Chapman was in the position of an actual and perceived conflict of interest.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202205047c445ffff487405790000198">On radio this morning, the Attorney stated that an eminent QC made recommendations on behalf of the select committee, and further that the sanctions the parliament handed down were not on the basis of conflict of interest, that they were on the basis of misleading parliament. Attorney, who is correct—yourself on radio this morning or the Ombudsman?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2022-05-04T15:04:05" />
        <text id="202205047c445ffff487405790000199">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-04T15:04:05" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Attorney-General, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Minister for Industrial Relations and Public Sector) (15:04):</by>  I will check, to make sure I am accurately representing this, but as I recall the original sanction the House of Assembly proposed to impose was nine days, and that was on the basis of three days for each of the instances of misleading parliament. That was reduced to six days, I think on the basis of two days for each of three instances of misleading parliament. I will go back and check and, if I need to add anything more to that, I am happy to do so.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>